Maybe one reason I get so angry at people like Damon Linker and Terry Eagleton—who maintain that New Atheists attack simplistic and unsophisticated versions of religion that nobody really believes (i.e., seeing God as an anthropomorphic being)—is because I see examples of “literalist” belief virtually every day. As more readers come to this site, it also gets infested with the religious, and a quotidian task is purging the new (and therefore held-up) comments by believers who have nothing to contribute beyond faith-soaked ranting. If you think that most people see God as a “ground of being”, you should have a look at this site’s inbox.
Here are two comments by one “Walt,” for example, that appeared within a few minutes of each other yesterday afternoon.
Walt commented on Bill Nye talks about his upcoming debate with Ken Ham
But yet you accept the probability of the Big Bang event though it is astronomically improbable mathamatically that it is possible. Also you accept the ” theory” of evolution when science has no proof of even a one called organism being mutated into a completely different organism. I promise you one day God will get you by your tail and you ” ain’t” gonna like it.
Oh man, I hope God doesn’t get me by the tail! And another:
Walt commented on Bill Nye talks about his upcoming debate with Ken Ham
Don’t you ever wonder why everything in this universe has a mathematical equation tied to it? Do you really believe an explosion of particles could lead to a creation that can be solved mathematically isn’t of a divine nature? Take the time to study the Bible the way you have studied your secular books and you too will know God. There is still time to make amends. Just because you don’t have the brainpower to fathom eternity doesn’t mean you aren’t going to be miserable there.
Needless to say, you won’t see Walt’s posts on the site. I put them up here not because they’re unusual, but because they’re common. Do you suppose that people like Walt see God as an ineffable essence beyond space and time, or, as Damon Linker said,
On the contrary, according to the classical metaphysical traditions of both the East and West, God is the unconditioned cause of reality — of absolutely everything that is — from the beginning to the end of time. Understood in this way, one can’t even say that God “exists” in the sense that my car or Mount Everest or electrons exist. God is what grounds the existence of every contingent thing, making it possible, sustaining it through time, unifying it, giving it actuality. God is the condition of the possibility of anything existing at all.
Now I don’t know “Walt,” but I suspect he wouldn’t recognize that paragraph as having anything to do with his religion. Hell, I don’t even recognize that paragraph as intelligible prose! The fact is that most believers don’t sing that line of jaw-music, and there’s no reason why we should give someone like Terry Eagleton extra credibility for truly homing in on the nature of God. How does he know?
One day I’d love to see a fairly eloquent semi-literalist debate a Ground-of-Being-ist, e.g. Ray Comfort or Al Mohler vs. Terry Eagleton. Let the believers fight it out and thereby settle for once and for all the nature of God!









