Readers’ wildlife photos

August 14, 2017 • 7:30 am

Once again I implore you to send me your photos—unless you want this feature to die a miserable death. Thanks!  Today we have lovely photos from our regularest regular, the estimable Stephen Barnard from Idaho. His notes are indented:

Rufous Hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus):

Cedar Waxwings (Bombycilla cedrorum) with a juvenile:

These enormous dragonflies (species unknown) flew into my house coupled in passion. They were noisy! I picked them up and and took them outside, where they flew off.

 

 

Monday: Hili dialogue (and Leon monologue)

August 14, 2017 • 6:30 am

Here we are at Monday again: August 14, 2017, and it’s one week till the big solar eclipse. It won’t be total in Chicago (though it will  be downstate), but it’ll be pretty good, and I hope it’s not cloudy that day. If you live in the U.S. and want to see how the eclipse will look from where you live, go here.  Here’s what the near-totality will look like in Chicago (it also gives time lapse views, so you can know when to start looking):

August 14 is National Creamsicle Day, a favorite treat of my youth (it’s a bar of vanilla ice on a stick, but covered by what seems to be orange sherbet). I don’t know if they even make them any more, but given that they’re still the subject of a holiday, I expect they do. It’s also Independence Day in Pakistan, celebrating the Partition that occurred on midnight of that day (the midnight spanning the 14th and 15th).

On this day in 1935,  Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act, a blatant act of socialism (which some seem to forget), creating a government pension for all people who had worked. On August 14, 1945, Japan accepted the allied terms of surrender (it was August 15 in Japan), and the formal surrender took place September 2 on the U.S. battleship Missouri. Here’s a photo of the formal surrender:

Japanese foreign affairs minister Mamoru Shigemitsu signs the Japanese Instrument of Surrender on board USS Missouri as General Richard K. Sutherland watches, September 2, 1945

Exactly two years later, Pakistan became independent from the British Empire. On August 14, 1975, The Rocky Horror Picture Show opened in London, starting the longest run of any motion picture in history. In 1980, Lech Wałęsa led the famous strike at the shipyards in Gdańsk, Poland—a place I’ll visit on my trip in September (the city, not the shipyards).

Notables born on this day include John Galsworthy (1867), Lina Wertmüller (1928), David Crosby (1941), Steve Martin (1945), Gary Larson (1950), Emannuelle Béart (1963), Halle Berry (1966), and Tim Tebow (1987). Those who died on this day include William Randolph Hearst (1951) and Bertolt Brecht (1956). All biologists (and many others) love Larson’s cartoons, and it’s very sad that he hung up his pen. Here’s one of my favorites; feel free to insert yours below (you can see many cat cartoons here):

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili senses the onset of winter, a season she hates:

Hili: I can imagine that.
A: What can you imagine?
Hili: Winter and snow.
A: But you prefer summer.
Hili: Yes, imagination spoils all pleasure.
In Polish:
Hili; Mogę to sobie wyobrazić.
Ja: Co takiego?
Hili: Zimę i śnieg.
Ja: Ale ty wolisz lato.
Hili: Tak, wyobraźnia psuje całą przyjemność.
In southern Poland, Leon and his staff returned to the same place in the mountains that they hiked last winter. But now there is no snow, and Leon kvetches:
Leon: How many changes there have been here!

Yesterday it was hot in Winnipeg, and Gus was snoozing outdoors in the heat:

Finally, Matthew Cobb sent a tw**t showing a video of a rare but beautiful leucistic (not albino) moose in Sweden. I hope the hunters leave it alone!

Duck chase!

August 13, 2017 • 2:44 pm

Here’s what happens when I try to feed the new to-be-named mallard at the same time as Honey. She lowers her head and swims very fast toward the interloper, driving her away. It’s competition for food, folks!

I still manage to slip some noms to the new mallard on the sly, but half the time there’s a kerfuffle. When it’s not feeding time, they’re pals, swimming peacefully in tandem.

Jerry has two duckies

August 13, 2017 • 2:00 pm

(You should recognize the allusion in the title.) When I went down to feed Honey this morning, I thought I was seeing double: there were two hen mallards in the pond, swimming side by side. One was Honey, as I recognize her by her greener head, bill stippling, and her immediate reaction to my whistle, but the other was a larger hen mallard. They seemed to be friendly.

Here they are—Honey’s the smaller one on the lower right:

This, of course, produced a dilemma: I had food for one duck; should I feed them both? But that problem resolved itself. When I tried to give food to the other hen, Honey chased her away immediately. I was able to toss the interloper a few pieces of corn, but since she obviously flew in from last night (oy! were her wings tired!), she was in good shape. She also didn’t like mealworms.

Here are the beak markings I use to recognize my girl:


After the feeding, the two ducks joined up again and began feeding from the pond surface together. While Honey is clearly the dominant duck, though she’s the smaller one, they seem friendly enough when they’re not being fed. The dominance behavior is, of course, evinced most strongly when there’s something to defend—like hand-fed corn and mealworms.

I’m happy that Honey seems to have a friend, and maybe they’ll even migrate away together—but I’m worried about having to deal with two ducks and antagonistic behavior during feeding time.

So it goes.

If the new one hangs around, what should I name her? Suggestions appreciated.

 

Where is North Korea? Some Americans have no idea

August 13, 2017 • 1:00 pm

Now these people, asked on Hollywood Boulevard by the Jimmy Kimmel show to find North Korea on a map, are clearly not a random subset of Americans. In fact, they’re probably better educated. I show this not to make fun of the people (though they seem to think that North Korea is near either Greenland or the Middle East), but to show how abysmally ignorant many of us are about what goes on in the rest of the world. As the Torygraph pointed out three years ago, a poll shows that the problem is pervasive:

A National Geographic poll [JAC: This was in 2006, but I doubt things have changed] of over 500 young Americans, aged 18 to 24, showed that six per cent failed to locate their own country on a map of the world.

Among those with a high school education or less, the figure was one in ten. Only one in three could find Great Britain on a map.

In the same group, two thirds of the respondents estimated the population of the US at between 750 million and two billion (actual figure: 298 million).

Three quarters said English was the most commonly spoken native language in the world. It is actually third, behind Mandarin Chinese and Spanish.

There is an old joke that war was invented to teach Americans geography, but that no longer seems to be true.

In the same National Geographic poll, conducted three years after the Iraq War began, only 37 per cent of young Americans could find Iraq on a map of the Middle East.

The same percentage could point out Saudi Arabia.

Only one in four could locate Israel or Iran.

Even among college students, only 23 per cent found all four countries.

More mush-headed atheist bashing

August 13, 2017 • 12:00 pm

This is a comment that I trashed, but wanted people to see it anyway. Reader “Kezzy” tried to append it to my post “I’m worried about North Korea,” and it shows the lack of thinking on the part of atheist-bashers. It’s inconceivable to Kezzy that atheists would worry about the welfare of others, of future generations, or even value their own life.  Does this person not realize that knowing that our time is finite, and there’s nothing afterwards, makes us value life even the more? Why would we be indifferent to life itself just because we don’t believe in gods?

Of course this person is also embittered and sufficiently steeped in faith that his thinking organs may be impaired.

Wow, look at all the worried atheists! You guys don’t believe in anything after death, so why are you so worried? What are you worried about? It’s either die now because of a conflict or live a few more years and then die, maybe of disease or old age. At least nuclear war would be a quick way to go…..actually I suppose there is always the radiation poisoning which could be pretty excruciating.

Charlottesville 2

August 13, 2017 • 10:15 am

This morning there is not much new to add to the news about the Charlottesville battle between white supremacists and Nazi sympathizers on the one hand, and Antifa adherents, Black Lives Matter people, religious figures, and progressive anti-racists on the other. Last night Heather Hastie wrote a good analysis of the situation, and I refer you to her post, which I agree with completely. I’ll add just a few comments here.

First, I don’t know enough to say who was responsible for most of the violence. Clearly both sides came loaded for bear and ready to fight, but the right-wingers were clearly carrying shields, weapons, and even garb that made them look like cops. Given the pugnacity of both sides, a fight was nearly inevitable. I’ll wait to see if the violence was initiated by only one side, but I doubt it. It seems as if both sides contributed, since some right wingers got clubbed, which means that their opponents came with clubs, and probably not for self-defense.

On the other hand, at least one death (the others were in a helicopter crash whose details are murky) is probably to be laid at the door of the white supremacists. Their rally, ostensibly to protest the removal of a statue of Confederate general Robert E. Lee, became a coming-together of the “basket of deplorables”—the racists, nativists, and white supremacists that have burgeoned since Trump’s election. Confederate flags were paraded next to Nazi flags. When a state of emergency was declared and the bigots were disbanded, their opponents were walking triumphantly down a street when they were rammed by a fast-moving car. It killed one person and injured 19.

The photo below, from the New York Times, is horrific, and shows the moment of impact. The driver, James Alex Fields, Jr. of Ohio, was 20, white, and has been charged with second-degree murder, three counts of malicious wounding, and failing to stop at the scene of a crash at which someone was killed. Curiously, although he was arrested, the NYT says that “the authorities declined to say publicly that Mr. Fields was the driver of the car that plowed into the crowd.” If that was the case, why was he arrested? I suspect he wasn’t on the progressive side.

Ryan M. Kelly/The Daily Progress, via Associated Press

I’ll add one thing here. Whoever drove that car was a reprehensible and violent person. And he may well have been motivated by racist and white supremacist ideology—an ideology I despise. But not all the demonstrators on the Right would have done that, so while I deplore their ideology and call them out as hateful bigots, we have to distinguish between those who commit and directly incite violence, and those who espouse sentiments that do not directly call for violence but could lead to violence as an unforseen consequence. That’s how the courts have interpreted the First Amendment: direct incitement is illegal, while speech that causes violence as a byproduct is not. (Do I have to repeat that I don’t like racist speech, either?) Remember that the American Civil Liberties Union, largely supported by Jews, went to court to support the rights of Nazis to march through Skokie, Illinois—a Jewish suburb. That march could have caused violence (it didn’t), but was not a direct call for violence.

Still, if this driver was trying to kill those who protested a racist and white supremacist philosophy, I blame that philosophy and ideology as a causal factor. It would be hypocritical to deny that racism played a role in the car incident while denying that Islamic doctrine didn’t play a role in recent cases when Islamists committed murder by vehicle. These are all terrorist acts designed to intimidate.

As a former conscientious objector, I cannot abide people trying to hurt each other, especially in demonstrations. Hurt feelings are not the same thing as wounded bodies. Whoever struck out not in self-defense is contributing to the violence, and clearly that involves some people on both sides. I won’t apportion blame here, for the facts are still emerging.  But I will say that those on the progressive Left should never encourage violence—even against those whose ideology and ideas we deeply despise. Our methods are peaceful protests, counter-demonstrations, and public speeches and writings. I wouldn’t even go to a demonstration with a weapon; I’d rather be beaten, like the Civil Rights protestors of the Sixties who practiced civil disobedience, or flee. So those on the Left who have encouraged or countenanced violence, even against racists and white supremacists, are doing our values—and the Constitution—a disservice.

Some bloggers, like P. Z. Myers and Dan Arel, who call for “first-strike” violence against white supremacists, are deeply wrong. In a recent post, Myers, who is becoming increasingly unhinged and pugnacious, wrote this:

We can at least appreciate this moment of linguistic simplification: KKK, alt-right, white supremacist, and Nazi all refer to exactly the same thing, one united collection of deplorable bigots, and we should likewise unite to oppose them all. No more Nazis. Shun them, scorn them, punch them in the face. Tear down their monuments, trash their flags, fire them from their jobs.

While this may be bluster by someone comfortably ensconced behind a distant computer, it’s asking for a violation of the law that goes far beyond civil disobedience. It’s also nonproductive: do we really win sympathy for the Left by punching people and “trashing their flags” (that, too, is unconstitutional)? Finally, not all these people are equal: some of the Righters incite and practice violence, and should be arrested; others are practicing free speech and should be countered with speeches and demonstrations, but not attacked. Finally, to equate the “alt-right” with the KKK and Nazis is ridiculous. After all, Myers has, as I recall, placed people like Dave Rubin, Sam Harris, and Steven Pinker on the alt-right. Does he really want his followers to physically attack these peope? (Needless to say, most of the comments on that and other posts by Myers are in favor of punching and other violence). Please—let us not call for such behavior on this site.

Finally, I place the right-wing sentiments, the racism and anti-Semitism evinced by the protestors at the door of Trump. As one reader commented yesterday, Trump is slow to condemn this kind of bigotry, and will do so only if forced, in effect saying, “There—I’ve condemned them; are you happy now?” Trump’s election emboldened the racists, the Nazi sympathizers, and the white supremacists, for they recognized that he was a nativist, too. Remember when, at a rally before the election, he incited his followers to beat up a heckler? Trump did call for calming the situation in Charlottesville, but in a masterpiece of weaseltude failed to condemn the racists and bigots, saying the violence was due to “hatred, bigotry, and violence on all sides.” That is chickenshit, non-Presidential, and an explicit display of his unwillingness to call out bigotry. Condemning “violence” is okay, but doesn’t go far enough.

After all, Democrats and even some Republicans decried this bigotry. These include attorney general Jeff Sessions,  Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, as well as Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, who posted these tw**ts:

Much as I dislike Ryan, I read this as a condemnation of anti-Semitism, nativism, and racism. Trump should have been the leader here, not a reluctant follower. As far as I know, he still hasn’t said a word about the Nazism, white supremacy, and bigotry on view in Charlottesville. That also goes for Ted Cruz. Marco Rubio, John McCain, and Mitt Romney

Finally, Matthew sent me this tweet, whose short clip, made in 1947, is eerily relevant today:

https://twitter.com/OmanReagan/status/896563796071731201