Hili dialogues

November 9, 2016 • 7:00 am

On this day in history, in 2016, the unthinkable happened: the American people elected as their leader an ignorant, racist demagogue, far worse than anything we could have imagined when we saw George W. Bush as the bottom of the political barrel. The barrel is apparently a lot deeper than we thought. Professor Ceiling Cat, confident of a Clinton victory, was wrong. He will dutifully pay off his bets. The polls were wrong, too. That can only mean that either the polls were conducted incorrectly or, more likely, people didn’t want to say they were voting for Trump.

I have no words to bemoan the next four years, years with a Republican congress and President. The Supreme Court will remain conservative. Trump will get through what legislation he wants. Those who voted for Trump because they were tired of the establishment will, I fear, realize their error too late, perhaps among the smoking ruins of America.

I declare that we have one day to moan and despair, and then we must roll up our sleeves and get to work—working for the realization of those liberal values we supported with our vote.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili and Cyrus are talking not about politics, but about their joint bed:

Cyrus: We have several options.
Hili: For the moment I would retain status quo.
p1050028
In Polish:
Cyrus: Mamy kilka opcji.
Hili: Chwilowo zachowałabym status quo.
And an update: Hili comments on the election:
Cyrus: Do you have any comment to the American election?
Hili: Meow.
15027728_10210236812304055_8882084564856014262_n
In Polish:
Cyrus: Masz jakiś komentarz do wyników tych amerykańskich wyborów?
Hili: Miau.
And three tw**ts:

Hillary wins!

November 8, 2016 • 3:00 pm

UPDATE: I was wrong. We’ll see lots of postmortem analyses in the next few weeks (there are some in this thread), but the damage is done. I just went for a walk around central Hong Kong and felt sick to my stomach, unable to even think rationally about what just happened. To those I’ve bet on this site, send me your address and I’ll pay off. But the whole country is going to pay a much larger price than I over the next four years.

________

By the time this post goes up (I’m writing it at 2:30 a.m. Chicago time), enough ballots will have been cast to ensure a Presidential victory for Hillary Clinton. Or such is my prediction, and I stand to win about $600 if she does win. (All those bets were with credulous liberals who thought Trump had a chance, and would gladly pay me $100 out of relief if Clinton won. I love liberal suckers!)

Who knows what the next four years hold? If the Senate goes Democratic, which may well happen, we’ll get a more liberal Supreme Court justice, one who may help overturn some of the horrible decisions of the pre-Scalia-coronary court, including their wonky interpretation of the Second Amendment (the right to keep and bear arms).

I was never a big fan of Hillary, though many of the readers here are, but if she wins I wish her well and will support those of her policies with which I agree (she already has my vote). By the time readers wake up the morning after this post, we’ll have the nation’s first woman President, and a big bunch of angry Republicans. Although I hope the country can come together after the election, that’s very unlikely: the Republicans, whose policy was simply to obstruct anything Obama wanted, will continue to do that with Hillary, whom they hate even more than Obama. And there will be all those disgruntled Trump supporters, many of whom have guns.

In my experience, this is the most tumultuous time in American political life since the Watergate affair. I can’t predict what will happen after Clinton wins, but readers are welcome to weigh in below.

Election day diversions

November 8, 2016 • 1:00 pm

by Greg Mayer

Here in the U.S. it’s election day, and Americans are going to the polls to vote (many have already cast ballots in early voting). To divert you while awaiting the results (we’re expecting them at 3:00 PM Chicago time), here are a couple of items.

First, the following photo is of identical twins. Does it look like they are? Think about it first, and then post your thoughts in the comments. I’m sure most readers will figure it out.

Identical twins.
Identical twins.

Second, my correspondent in Yokosuka, Japan, sends the following photo, and comments, “If I told you I just got a rugby playing squirrel from a vending machine in a camera store you’d think it was weird, but then remember I’m in Japan…. I especially like how the nut is the ball.”

A rugby-playing squirrel from Yokosuka, Japan.
A rugby-playing squirrel from Yokosuka, Japan.

The squirrel seems to be stretching for a try. If anyone can read the accompanying brochure, please translate it for us.  I didn’t realize rugby was well enough known in Japan to be the subject of toys, but rugby is popular in a number of places you might not associate with the sport.

Hong Kong

November 8, 2016 • 11:00 am

I didn’t have the usual leisure time in the past week to post pictures and information about my trip, for I’m doing a lot of stuff here. But my last three days after Friday are free days, which I’ll use for sightseeing, eating, and maybe finding some nice tea to take back home. (Any recommendations for all of these things, locals? I’m staying in “Central” off Wellington Street.)

Here are some random photos of my peregrinations.

Hong Kong, photographed from across the water in Kowloon. What is appealing about Hong Kong is its felicitous mixture of modernity (viz., the buildings below) and older Chinese culture, or rather Hong Kong culture, as there’s currently a lot of friction between the residents of Hong Kong and the Chinese government, formally their “masters.”

p1110494

A group of people waiting to cross the street when the light changes. Some of the expats here complain that Hong Kong is too crowded, but they’ve clearly never been to Old Delhi in India!

p1110496

HSBC, the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, is one of the world’s largest banks. One of my hosts here, Andrew, works for them and took my by the local headquarters to see their very famous brass lions—so famous that they have their own Wikipedia page. The guarding lions, named Stephen and Stitt, first appeared in Shanghai, but the ones in Hong Kong are the most famous:

When HSBC decided to build its third Headquarters at 1 Queen’s Road Central in Hong Kong, opened in 1935, it commissioned two bronze lions from Shanghai-based British sculptor WW Wagstaff. This commission was inspired by the earlier lions commissioned for the Shanghai office, and the Hong Kong lions were modelled on, but are not identical to, the Shanghai lions.

Wagstaff worked with “Shanghai Arts and Crafts” foreman Chou Yin Hsiang who in an interview with John Loch of HSBC’s house magazine “Group News” in June 1977 recalled that when he first joined Arts and Crafts he worked with Wagstaff for two years to make the lions, without having to learn a word of English. . .

. . . As a mark of the respect the lions were held in, the move to Statue Square, and the move back in 1985, were accompanied by the chairman Sir Michael Sandberg and senior management of the Bank and the placement of the lions both temporarily and in their current locations was made only after extensive consultations with feng shui practitioners.

. . . Like the Shanghai lions, the Hong Kong lions became objects of veneration, and focii [sic] of the Bank’s perceived excellent feng shui. Young couples still bring their toddlers to stroke the paws and noses of the statues hoping for luck and prosperity.

Here’s Stephen; note how his paws have been rubbed bright by those wanting good luck:

p1110537

And:

The Hong Kong lions are also called Stephen and Stitt, and the Hong Kong Stephen has bullet or shrapnel scars in its left hind-quarters dating from the fighting in the Battle of Hong Kong. [JAC: On Dec. 7, 1941, the same day the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, they also attacked Hong Kong, defeating the British and Canadian, and Indian defenders within two weeks.]

The lions were taken away by the Japanese but fortuitously recovered; read more about them here.

Japanese bullet and shrapnel damage:

p1110536

A Buddhist-themed park (with a nunnery next door) in Kowloon:

p1110540

Real estate is hideously expensive in Hong Kong, which means that apartments and stores must be small. Here’s a hardware store: the Hong Kong equivalent of Home Depot. You can’t find anything yourself; you have to ask, and the proprietor can locate anything

p1110484

A store selling dried sea goods, like sea cucumber, skate, and (unfortunately) shark fin:

p1110485

This store sells almost exclusively soy sauce: there are many more types of soy sauce here than in the U.S., as each type is used for a different dish or type of food:

p1110500

Because storage space is small, and most locals shop for food daily, freshness is prized and paramount. I was told that this beef was living cow the day before it came to market (there’s no refrigeration in these markets):

p1110501

Several streets in the city are devoted to the Flower Market, a lovely place:

p1110546

Pitcher plants for sale, hanging from the ceiling

p1110549

Bonsai for sale:

p1110550

I was astounded that this tiny apple tree, no more than three feet tale, bore full-sized fruit:

p1110547

Nearby is the Bird Market, which saddened me as there were many wild birds for sale in small cages, unable to fly free. I couldn’t bear to photograph them. Here’s one store, though, that sells fancy cages:

p1110557

My one photo from the bird market: an older Chinese man and his parrot, which he fondled and kissed. I was told by a friend that this is a male Eclectus parrot, (Eclectus roratus) from Southeast Asia.

p1110567

When I wondered how my friend knew it was a male, as many parrots have identical males and females, I found out that this species, from SE Asia and its islands, has extreme sexual dimorphism, so that males are green like the one above, while females look like the one on the right below (photo from Wikipedia). Don’t ask me why:
eclectus_roratus-20030511

Also nearby is the Goldfish Market, where all kinds of goldfish and koi (all a single highly modified species of carp) are for sale. The small ones hang in bags on the street; presumably they’re put back in tanks at night:

p1110573

The power of artificial selection!:

p1110576

p1110579

Finally, under some of the underpasses and walkways on the weekend I saw large groups of women sitting on blankets and sheets of cardboard, with food, drinks, playing cards, and so on. They were clearly not homeless people, and I was told that these are the domestic workers of Hong Kong—largely from the Philippines—who gather to meet their fellow workers on the weekends. The underpass gives them a sheltered place to congregate, chat, eat, and while away the hours.

p1110581

 

Indian shooter withdraws from Iranian competition, refusing to wear hijab; a hijabi fashion blogger flaunts her makeup

November 8, 2016 • 9:30 am

Not much seems to have happened since I posted about the Iranian Women’s world chess championship next year, in which women will be forced to wear the hijab. American champion Nazi Paikidze-Barnes refused to participate under those conditions, and was supported by not only other female and male players, including Garry Kasparov and Pan-American champion Carla Heredia, but also the U.S. Chess Federation as a whole. (FIDE, the world chess federation, has rules against sex discrimination.)

The only update is that the President of FIDE, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, says that players should respect local laws and customs, and therefore women should wear the hijab. That may torpedo the chances of FIDE’s dream of having chess included as an Olympic sport, as the International Olympic Committee is examining FIDE’s decision to see whether it violates Olympic rules against sex discrimination.  (I’m not sure whether chess qualifies as a “sport”, but my very thin book of Great Jewish Athletes, given to me when I was a child, had to include chess players or there would be virtually nobody in the pages besides Sandy Koufax and Hank Greenberg!)

Finally, Iranian chess players are of course opposing Paikidze-Barnes’s call for a boycott, with some saying stuff like this:

“This campaign against the tournament is against Iranian women and it doesn’t help at all,” said Sara Khademalsharieh, a 19-year-old international master from Iran.

“It’s the first time we are hosting a world championship, not only in chess but [in any] sport, and I think it’s very important for Iranian women to have this chance to hold such major events.”

Her comments were echoed by teammate Mitra Hejazipour, a 23-year-old grandmaster.

“The hijab is not oppression. We are used to it and it’s one of Iran’s laws and we accept it,” she said.

But it surely is oppression, as Iranian women protested en masse when the hijab was made mandatory in 1979. Just because slaves are used to their shackles doesn’t mean they’re not oppressed. And the women of Iran have no choice about accepting the law.

Here are rare photos of Iranian women protesting the hijab decree in 1979. They lost. “We are used to it” indeed!

women_protesting_hijab_iran

Whenever someone from Iran says that they wear the hijab by “choice”, remember these photos.

women_protesting_hijab_iran_2-1

Now another woman athlete, from India, has taken a similar stand to Paikidze-Barnes. The India Times reports that an Indian shooter, Heena Sidhu, is refusing to participate in the Asian Airgun championship in Iran, despite being the Asian champion, because she won’t wear the required hijab.

“Forcing tourists or foreign guests to wear ‘hijab’ is against the spirit of the game. Since I don’t like it, I have withdrawn my name,” Heena told Times of India. “You follow your religion and let me follow mine. I’ll not participate in this competition if you are going to force me to comply with your religious beliefs,” she said.

Her eloquent and principled stand is a strong rebuke to all the Iranian women who say that they’ve gotten used to the garment forced on them against their will 47 years ago.

heenasidhu3afp_1477741724
Heena Sidhu

In other news, the Regressive Left continues to fall all over itself trying to evince the greatest approbation and worship of this repressive headscarf. Check out the “Religion” section of PuffHo, which never fails to throw women under the bus when it comes to praising Islam. There you’ll see this headline (click on the screenshot to see the article):

screen-shot-2016-11-08-at-1-08-02-am

Look at that subheading: “We’re so excited!” But why? Because someone who wears a garment meant to preserve female modesty, and avoid calling attention to one’s femininity and beauty, wrecks that whole plot by doing this?:

screen-shot-2016-11-08-at-1-10-42-am

Good God! (Or should I say, “God is great!”). Unless you’re wearing the hijab as a cultural rather than religious garment, something that I’ve never heard any woman say (I’m sure there are a few), it’s sheer hypocrisy to cover your hair to avoid exciting attention (and men) while wearing tons of makeup to effect just the opposite. HuffPo, however, can’t see the problem, touting this as a big blow for “diversity”:

Nura Afia is a well-known Muslim beauty blogger and now, she’s also an ambassador for CoverGirl.

. . . CoverGirl’s campaigns are absolutely wrecking the competition by showing faces that represent more than just one cookie-cutter ideal. Beauty is not exclusive and shouldn’t ever be treated as such.

Congrats, Nura!!

That last sentence, about “cookie cutter ideals,” bears some thought. If this woman were a Muslim who didn’t wear a hijab, nobody would get “excited” at all. Example? Iman, the stunningly beautiful Muslim model (and wife of the late David Bowie), who began a modeling career in 1976. Why doesn’t she represent diversity as much as does Nura Afia? Only because Iman doesn’t wear a hijab. That’s nothing to get excited about, eh, PuffHo? You have to show the signs of oppression to get them excited. Such is the Regressive Left.

h/t: Malgorzata

Nature Ecology and Evolution begins publishing

November 8, 2016 • 8:30 am

This journal, one of the family of Nature spinoffs, has been in the works for a while, and I have great hopes for it. Headed by editor Patrick Goymer, who used to work for the Mother Nature, comes out with its first official issue next January, but has already published four online articles that you can read for free. It also has a Facebook page that you can “like” to get updates and, as all new journals must, it also has a  Twitter page.


I’m pleased to have made the first comment on the FB page, which is to wish the journal and its editors well, but—because I’m petulant—to add the hope that Nature E&E doesn’t go the way of its Mother Nature by coddling religion or publishing articles about how science and religion are harmonious. If it keeps its wits about it, the new journal will simply keep the superstition out of its pages.

prxp9w7t