Welcome to Monday, September 21, 2026: the last full day of summer and the second and final day of Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar. Yom Kippur ends at sundown, and observant Jews who have fasted and refrained from drinking can start ingesting then.

It’s also National Chai Day. I’ve been drinking the stuff for decades, since I first went to India, but now it’s become very popular (in various forms, like lattes) in America. Here’s how the really good stuff is made in a street stall; note the high pouring from vessel to vessel (6:05) that cools the tea and foams the milk. The chaiwallas pride themselves on the height of their pour.

A nice cup of chai I had ten years ago in Bangalore (Bengaluru):

It’s also International Day of Peace, National Beef Stroganoff Day, National Pecan Cookie day, and National Sponge Candy Day.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the September 21 Wikipedia page.

Posting will be light tomorrow, and perhaps for several days thereafter, as I have to have the lens in my right eye pulverized, sucked out, and replaced with an artificial one. Such are the ravages of age.

Da Nooz:

*Trump has carried through on his threat to ban reporters for three liberal media venues from the White House (article archived here).

CNN, MS NOW and Politico said their journalists were denied access to the White House grounds early Saturday and that their press passes were confiscated, a day after President Donald Trump said he would ban them — and that other media organizations would follow.

Numerous press freedom organizations said the president’s attempt to ban journalists from reporting at the White House was an unconstitutional attack on Americans’ free speech and right to know what’s happening in government.

“The First Amendment extends to White House grounds as strongly if not more than pretty much anywhere,” said Seth Stern, chief of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation. “It’s the people’s house; it’s the center of government.”

The media organizations all said they would fight the restrictions and continue reporting on the president. CNN and MS NOW journalists began reporting across the street from the White House on Saturday.

“The White House belongs to the American people and the decisions made inside are funded by our tax dollars,” MS NOW said in a statement. “MS NOW intends to take any and all steps necessary to defend our First Amendment rights and the essential role of independent journalism in our democracy.”

Trump abruptly announced Friday he would ban MS NOW, CNN and Politico from the White House, saying he disliked how they covered him. “They’re fake news,” he said.

Akayla Gardner, a White House reporter for MS NOW, described on air how she tried to scan her badge to enter the White House grounds but was told it was “disabled.” An MS NOW producer who was with her was able to enter, but a photographer “had their badge taken this morning,” she added.

It’s clear now that what Trump means by “fake news” is “news I don’t like”, even if that news is true.  But this decision will not stand, for it’s a clear violation of the First Amendment and, if it stood, would allow any President to exercise censorship over news he didn’t like.  Obama said yesterday, with a chuckle, something like “Imagine if I decided to ban Fox News from my press conferences.”

*In an article in the NYT Magazine (archived here), Nikole Hannah-Jones of “1619” infamy sent her daughter Najya to a so-so public school in Washington, D.C.: an attempt to improve the substandard system by participating in it. It failed; her daughter got a poor education up to middle school:

In an interview in the paper’s morning newsletter yesterday, Jones said this:

I asked her permission to report it in the first place, and then I asked if she wanted to be photographed for the story. She’s angry about the choices that my husband and I made, and she wanted to have her say. Did she really want people to know she had failed algebra after middle school? Her answer impressed me: “Well, it’s true.” But when I showed her a draft, she didn’t feel I was hard enough on myself. So I tried to capture the conflict. In the years since my original essay, I’ve moved through the world with the unearned valor of people commending me for the strength of my choice. Now I felt I owed it to her to tell the truth.

*The WSJ reports on “The twin sisters facing the wrath of Iran’s crackdown” (subtitle: “Romina and Taraneh Rahimi were detained in January after a wave of protests. One was sentenced to decades behind bars; the other condemned to death”).

Taraneh Rahimi was staying with friends on the night of Jan. 24 when masked, armed men barged into the house, put a bag over her head and took her away. They later came for her twin sister, Romina.

For months after that, their loved ones didn’t know where they were, or whether they were even alive. Their mother searched for her 20-year-old daughters everywhere, begging staff at hospitals, in courts and outside prisons for information about them, to no avail.

In April, she received an anonymous call, a family member said. “Your daughters are at Dowlatabad Prison. You can book an appointment to see them,” the caller told her.

When she finally saw the twins again, in Isfahan’s female prison, their mother could hardly recognize them. Their faces were puffy and there were bald patches where their hair had been ripped out. They recounted harrowing tales from their time in detention, where they were tortured and sexually assaulted, according to information obtained by relatives and lawyers who reviewed their case.

An Iranian government spokesman didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Their crime? Peaceful political protest, of course, and now one of them may die but both will be in a dire prison for a long time—for protesting, for crying out loud.

The Rahimi sisters were among 16 defendants detained over their alleged role in the unrest around Shohada Square in Isfahan earlier this year. The central Iranian city, known for its blue-tiled Islamic architecture, has emerged as a focal point of the continuing judicial crackdown.

. . . The twins spent the first three months in a detention center run by the intelligence arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, where they were tortured and sexually assaulted.

A lot of the torture was psychological, according to information obtained by relatives and human-rights lawyers familiar with the case. The sisters were held separately in isolation, but they could hear each other screaming and crying from a distance. They were made to watch male prisoners being tortured. Taraneh suffered severe physical injuries when she was repeatedly beaten with a baton on her leg, knee, hand and arm, according to the lawyers and relatives.

. . . . The twins turned 21 in prison. At the end of August, Taraneh, along with nine others, was sentenced to death. Romina received a 25-year prison sentence. The convictions could be appealed, but rights groups worry the executions could be fast-tracked.

Taraneh’s relatives fear she could soon be the first woman to be executed in Iran in connection to the protests. “Every night we fear it could happen,” said Masoud Nourmohammadi, a cousin of the twins who is based in the U.S. “It could be any time.”

Here’s a photo of the twins supplied to the WSJ by their family; the caption’s from the paper. They’ve already been beaten and sexually assaulted; this is what Masih keeps writing about in her twitter feed (see below).

*Over at the Times of Israel, Amit Segal describes “How Hamas stopped and started the presses,” showing how the terror group controlled all the news coming out of Gaza.

It’s Sunday, September 20, and the most revealing sentence spoken from Gaza’s press corps this year came on a podcast from one of its greatest stars. “If someone says something like this, many journalists lower the camera.”

That is Motaz Azaiza—one of TIME’s 100 most influential people of 2024, GQ Middle East’s man of the year—explaining how, when faced with dissent, the Gaza media complex fixes the narrative on Hamas’s behalf.

Speaking on the Palestinian podcast Taqarob, Azaiza described a WhatsApp group that “all the Gaza journalists are in.” For anyone picturing a professional association: its icon is a Hamas flag, and its administrator, he said, is the media director of the Rafah crossing.

Azaiza is no friend of Israel. TIME’s honoree celebrated October 7 and filmed hostages being beaten in a Gaza street, but then promptly buried the footage. When Yahya Sinwar was killed, he told mourners that anyone who had not answered Sinwar’s call to go out and engage the enemy had “no right to mourn and boast about the manner of his death.” Sinwar, he wrote, “wanted you in the field.”

That Gaza is an authoritarian hellscape is hardly worth stopping the presses for. Anyone thinking critically assumed Hamas controlled the narrative from the very beginning. Azaiza’s testimony is less an indictment of Hamas than of the media complex that lapped up its releases.

The Committee to Protect Journalists ran a feature in May of last year in which the head of the Palestinian Journalists’ Syndicate listed Hamas’s methods—summonses, interrogations, threats, beatings, arrests, publication bans, interference with content, surveillance—and his deputy conceded that most journalists in Gaza now censor themselves. One photographer, beaten unconscious by plainclothes police beside Nasser Hospital, told CPJ that when colleagues tried to intervene, they were informed that “the spy and the journalist are one and the same.” CPJ noted the violations were vastly underreported, because the victims were too frightened to say so.

. . .The foreign press has omitted Hamas control since 2008, when Hamas stopped the West Bank dailies at the crossing and told their editors, according to the head of the Palestinian Journalists’ Syndicate, that they could enter Gaza once they signed an undertaking not to criticize Hamas. It broke cover once again in 2014, when, in a rare moment of lucidity, the Foreign Press Association condemned the “blatant, incessant, forceful and unorthodox methods” used against its members in Gaza. A Hamas information official then confirmed it on Lebanese television: the security services, she explained, “would give them some time to change their message.”

When the war began, Hamas already had years of evidence that the foreign press would take what it was served. That is how a single group chat, with no foreign members, set a global narrative.

This is one reason why I trust the IDF more than the press coming out of Gaza. Israeli journlists (many, like those at Haaretz, opposed to their government) don’t have to take an oath not to criticize Israel.

*Finally, the WSJ has an article by the U of C President, Paul Alivisatos, on AI: “Teach students to think with, without and about AI“.

Something different and far more optimistic is emerging at the University of Chicago, including a new, AI-adapted core curriculum. Campuswide work on this topic commenced in the fall of 2024, with the creation of an interdisciplinary group of faculty to consider reforms. The report of this working group provides a simple, principled framework that will guide our changes in curriculum and classrooms. The first goal is that our students should learn during their time with us to be ethical, skeptical and ambitious about the role of AI in their education and their lives. The second is that all students at UChicago should learn to think both with and without machines.

Here, we hold fast to our belief that a core curriculum is the foundation for a college education that supports a life enriched by a love of learning and ideas. In the past, anyone proposing a change in our core curriculum would have to be steeled for a decadelong debate. Yet the urgency of this moment is prompting beneficial changes in tandem at a pace commensurate with the technological transformation.

Our core curriculum—which students largely complete within their first two years—consists of humanities and social science, as well as the study of mathematics and biological and physical sciences, and the study of civilization and the arts. Soon all undergraduates will be required to take a class in writing, without the aid of any machine, and engage in the true struggle. Real writing. Blank page. Tough comments from instructor and peers. The humanities and social-science cores will also exclude technology from the classroom.

In line with the principle that it is important for students to learn how to think with machines, there is broad internal support for the notion that to be an educated person today and in the future, one must be able to use computational tools and concepts within one’s domain, and to reason critically about how computation, data and algorithms shape what can be known and built. Likely, this will result in a new core curriculum requirement for coursework in computational thinking within the next year.

The idea that learning to use AI should be an integral part of learning how to think increasingly cuts across the whole of the university. Earlier this summer, our law school declared that first-year students will be required to learn to write and reason without technology in the classroom or the use of AI. This will be followed by deliberate and thoughtful integration of AI tools and methods in years two and three.

I heartily applaud the course in writing, though I’m not so keen on a course about how to use AI. I suppose they need to know how to use it, but it’s dead easy to learn on their own. I still consider writing skills essential for reasons I’ve stated before.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili’s knowledge of art prompts a question:

Hili: Did Rousseau have a cat?
Andrzej: I don’t know, why do you ask?
Hili: I’m wondering where he got the idea of the noble savage from.

In Polish:

Hili: Czy Rousseau miał kota?
Ja: Nie wiem, dlaczego pytasz?
Hili: Zastanawiam się, skąd mu się wzięła koncepcja szlachetnego dzikusa.

*******************

From Cats Doing Cat Stuff:

From Give Me a Sign:

From Bad Spelling on Signs and Notices; another salacious one:

From Masih, who argues that the Iranian government is not giving any “freedom” to its people.  Au contraire: they are training more authorities to oppress people.

Nobody gave Iranian women their freedom. They took it back. So that is why the regime hired these undercover police to crack down on women!

Recently on Christiane Amanpour’s video, I heard it again: the reformist government allowed its people to light candles for the victims of… https://t.co/LlMKt88Uz5 pic.twitter.com/6RYVxQivQ9

— Masih Alinejad (@AlinejadMasih) September 19, 2026

From Science Girl. Look at the Milky Way!

Have you ever wondered what happens at night on top of a mountain in the darkest place on Earth?

📹 Connor Paton/ connorpatonphotos pic.twitter.com/8kzUIpXet0

— Science girl (@sciencegirl) September 20, 2026

From the parody account “AOC”:

pic.twitter.com/WfKNHTIJee

— AOC (@ay_oh_see) September 9, 2026

.From Malcolm; photobombing cats (don’t miss the cat butt):

“Up Where?” pic.twitter.com/rv8KMNzgmA

— 𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑙 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑙𝑑 (@cuteeanimals0) September 12, 2026

One from my freed; an excellent summary:

This lady from Isreal sums up the whole Ed Sheeran bullshit excellently ‼️

And she’s very funny ❤️ pic.twitter.com/4EDieDTmtF

— Olly Parramore 🇬🇧 (@OllyParramore) September 19, 2026

One I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:

This German Jewish boy was gassed as soon as he arrived at Auschwitz. He was 13 years old. https://t.co/ZKQHWc2CWo

— Jerry Coyne (@Evolutionistrue) September 21, 2026

Two from Doc Cobb. First, dinnertime for tortoises:

Dinnertime! #AGoodPlaceSource: http://www.reddit.com/r/MadeMeSmil…

— Michelle says: Be kind. Always. ❤️ (@snarkysillysad.bsky.social) 2026-09-19T11:26:18.850Z

Matthew posted this himself and says that I MUST see “Amadeus”:

Re-re-re-re-watched AMADEUS. Even better than I remembered. The editing – film and sound – is extraordinary and Abraham deserved his Oscar. A really fabulous, opulent production. As to truth? It’s a fantasy, very harsh on Salieri, but rightly shows Mozart as the voice of God. One of the great films.

— Matthew Cobb (@matthewcobb.bsky.social) 2026-09-19T20:51:39.989Z

Welcome to Sunday, September 20. Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement and the holiest day on the Jewish calendar, begins at sundown tonight. If you’re an observant Jew, you can’t drink or eat (not even water), nor can you ykiss your wife. And if you’re really observant, you can’t brush your teeth, either, as you might accidentally swallow water. Below you can see a painting of the holiday, labeled “Jews Praying in the Synagogue on Yom Kippur (1878) by Maurycy Gottlieb”. 

Wikipedia says this about the painting:

The artist Maurycy Gottlieb appears in the painting three different times, depicted in different stages of his life. In one self-portrait, he is an adult, in another he is a young child, and in the third self-portrait he is depicted as an adolescent. Ezra Mendelsohn writes, “Maurycy himself stands, in a colorful, exotic-looking talith, with head in hand. On the left, we have the artist as a small boy, wearing a medallion with his initials written in Hebrew. On the extreme right is a young male figure, perhaps again Maurycy, reading from the prayer book alongside a man who might well be his father. Malinowski assumes that this is the case when he says that the painting presents ‘an account of [the artist’s] whole life’.”

It has been suggested that the artist placed his fiancée Laura [see below] among the female worshippers, at the right of the column, whispering to another woman (perhaps her mother), and to the left of the column, holding a prayerbook in hand. In the painting, many of the figures are people who are close to Gottlieb or people he knew at the time. As said by the Tel Aviv Museum of Art, Maurycy Gottlieb created this work of art at the young age of 22 years old; a year later, Gottlieb was dead.

How did he die at only 22? Wikipedia says it was a respiratory illness or suicide, but one scenario they give is reminiscent of the last scene in James Joyce’s short story The Dead:

The painting was exhibited in Lviv in 1877, and in 1878 at Zachęta in Warsaw and widely acclaimed. Gottlieb based Jessica’s face on that of Laura Rosenfeld, to whom he had proposed marriage. However, Laura rejected his proposal and wed a Berlin banker. According to one biographer, when he heard about Rosenfeld’s marriage, he purposely exposed himself to the elements and died of complications from a respiratory illness.  Others cite different reasons for his death, including suicide.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the September 20 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*The main airport in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, was attacked, and the Houthis have taken responsibility.

An airborne attack targeted jet-fuel storage at the airport in Saudi Arabia’s capital Saturday, marking the first direct assault on Riyadh in months as Yemen’s Houthi rebels squeeze the kingdom’s Red Sea route for its oil exports.

Black smoke could be seen at King Khalid International Airport, in the latest escalation in the attacks targeting the kingdom.

The strike hit jet fuel facilities at the airfield, three officials with knowledge of the incident said. It wasn’t immediately clear if a drone or a missile caused the damage. The Saudi government didn’t respond to a request for comment.

No one immediately claimed the assault, but Iran and its allies have been looking for ways to slow Saudi Arabia’s exports to increase the pain on the U.S. and the world’s economy. Saudi Arabia has been targeted over the last weeks in attacks launched from both Iraq, where Iranian-backed Shiite militias operate, and Yemen, home to the Houthis.

The Houthis didn’t immediately claim the attack. However, there had been a series of alerts sent early Saturday morning by authorities over likely incoming fire, including in Riyadh.

The Houthis have targeted Riyadh’s airport in the past. In 2017, the Houthis launched a ballistic missile at the airfield that Saudi Arabia said it intercepted. They also targeted the airport in 2018 in an attack that killed an Egyptian, as well as in 2020.

In recent years, a tentative ceasefire had held as Saudi Arabia paid the salaries of Yemeni government officials, including those in San’a. That came as the Houthis attacked Israel and struck ships in the Red Sea during the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip.

. . . U.S. Navy Adm. Brad Cooper, the head of the American military’s Mideast-based Central Command, said in a video statement Saturday that more than 1 billion barrels of crude oil from American allies had made it out of the Strait of Hormuz despite Iranian attacks.

Cooper didn’t provide specifics behind the 1 billion-barrel figure, and the number is difficult to compare directly with outside estimates.

Although Saudi Arabia is a repressive theocracy, it’s not as bad as Iran, and in this war, despite the Saudi assassination of dissidents in other countries, we should take all the allyship we can get in the Middle East so long as we don’t compromise American values (well, with Trump that’s inevitable).  Iran has decided to go after other Middle Eastern countries, and in the end I don’t see that it does them any good; in fact, it does them bad.

*Well, Trump’s takeover of Greenland has begun, though the Danes and Greenlanders seem not to realize it. Trump has made a deal with Denmark to take over military control of the island, and the Danes are “cautiously optimistic” about it.

President Donald Trump announced Friday he has a deal with Denmark to bolster the U.S. military presence in Greenland after months of threatening to take the island by force from the NATO ally — an agreement that also keeps the Arctic territory in Denmark’s hands.

Trump in a social media post announcing the deal said the emerging agreement “gives the United States permanent control over security, and all other needs, in Greenland, completely addressing ALL of our many U.S. concerns.”

He added that with the agreement his administration would “immediately” begin the process of developing a larger military presence on the mineral-rich Danish territory.

The deal came after officials from U.S., Greenland and Denmark quietly negotiated for months behind the scenes, searching for solutions to address some of Trump’s security concerns about a territory of roughly 56,000 residents.

AD

For Trump, the Greenland issue had largely been put on the back burner as he launched a military operation to oust former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from power and joined with Israel to start a war against Iran.

With the announcement of the pact, Trump is able to tout a foreign policy achievement ahead of the midterm elections. The six-month-old Iran conflict has reshaped the race, undermining Trump’s campaign pledge to steer clear of foreign conflicts and challenging Republicans as they cling to narrow majorities in Congress.

This is not an achievement that will outweigh the mishigas that has devastated Trump’s approval ratings so much in the last year, for hardly any Americans care about who’s in Greenland. Greenland is allowing this because it’s worried that Russia and China may be moving in on Greenland (granted, with ships and submarines), but with Denmark being a member of NATO, this buttresses an alliance and avoids the rift that would have occurred had Trump continued to demand that the U.S. own Greenland completely.

*In the Washington Post‘s “Awakenings” column, its weekly paean to the virtues of faith (the NYT has one, too, a cloying column called “Believing“), Byron R. Johnson and Thomas S. Kidd tell us that despite the increase in “nones” (people who don’t identify with a given faith), “Believe it or not, religion isn’t declining.”

One of the most persistent news stories about religion in recent years has been the decline of Christianity and the rise of the “nones,” or people who have no religion in particular. The nones narrative suggests that American Christianity is in free fall. One headline in recent weeks announced that even young Latinos, part of what is often regarded as one of the most religious ethnic groups, are “abandoning churches to be ‘nones.’”

Look closer, however, and you can find data suggesting that Christianity is flourishing. Some signs indicate that young American men are attending church more than they did in previous generations. High-profile intellectuals such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who was one of the leading figures of the New Atheist movement, have publicly announced their conversion to Christianity. And even the Pew Research Center, a chief promoter of the nones story, has admitted that the nones have plateaued at less than 30 percent of respondents.

Here’s the plateau from the Pew page. But “stabilizing” assumes what’s going to happen in the future, and the plateau has occurred only since the pandemic began, while the decline starts 13 year for that. And if you look at the longer term (graph below that), it’s hard to see anything but a long-term decrease in religion:

The summary of a longer-term survey shown on the Calvin College website, summarizing data from all over America.  The only thing that’s shot up is the “nones”, and “mainlines” (Protestants, I presume) are a third of what they were in 1970!

What is really happening? Rather than experiencing simple growth or decline, American religion is in a state of churn. Some sectors are falling fast, while others show phenomenal growth.

Throughout history, Americans have routinely misinterpreted religious change as decline. Headlines about the demise of faith may be attention-grabbing, but they conceal a more complicated and interesting reality.

What are the key factors behind the confusion about religious change? One is an overreaction to the rise of the nones. Today, more Americans claim adherence to no religion than did in the late 20th century. A generation ago, more adults would have said they were Christians even if they had no connection to a church.

Today, people are more candid about their religious identities. Outside of the Bible Belt, there is little shame in telling a pollster that you simply aren’t religious.

This does not mean that the nones are atheists or agnostics, though they are often labeled as such. Treating atheists, agnostics and nones as a unit allows observers to tout the blockbuster headline that “religious ‘nones’ are now the largest single group in the U.S.” This strained math obscures the fact that the number of self-identified Christians today remains more than twice the combined total of nones, atheists and agnostics.

This is the kind of nonsense that heartens the faithful but misleads everyone else.  The fact is that fewer people go to church than ever before, the “nones’ have shot up (granted, there is a six-year plateau), and “mainline” Christianity has dropped like a rock in the last fifty years.  It’s telling that faithheads like the authors here are so eager to seize on the “plateau” as a sign that religion isn’t going away. I have news for them: if they look over the last half-century, or even more over the last 150 years, religion has largely vanished.  In another century, it will be a mere shadow of itself—and a good thing, too.  Sadly, you don’t see any mainstream news outlet having a column called “Nonbelieving”.

*I’m getting plenty tired of AI-composed prose masquerading as something written by a human being. One of my ideological heroes, Rawan Osman, an ex-Muslim Syrian who is strongly pro-Israel and a self-described Arab Zionist who’s becoming Jewish, turns out to have written quite a few Twitter posts, Facebook posts, and posts on her blog at the Times of Israel that, according to the reliable AI-detection program Pangram,  are wholly or substantially written by AI (example here). I am so put off that I no longer read her, and when I pointed it out, fellow Jews and Israel sympathizers piled on me, saying “It doesn’t matter.” But it does.

Another example.  Maarten Boudry wrote me: “A literary First Prize has been awarded to a short story that is 100%. AI. Do you know Moth Magazine? Never heard of them, but they have 12K followers on X and have a Wikipedia page, so it’s not completely fringe.” Maarten’s tweet gives the story, “The Shoulder,” by Jeffrey-Michael Kane, and it’s still up. When I told the magazine (and another one) that Kane was using AI to write his fiction, I was blown off (the reply was “Although we avoid publishing AI-generated work, ultimately the responsibility for this rests with our authors, who we trust to submit original work.”)  Maarten is also peeved that his own rector at Ghent University gave an AI-generated speech as her inaugural address, with three out of the four quotes in it purely fabricated by AI.

Over at Maarten’s Substack site, he’s reprinted a Quillette article about his own disaffection with AI:  “Show us the prompts” x

The good news for anyone recruiting an AI ghostwriter is that the odds of public mortification are falling. Fabricated quotes and references are just about the only way to catch a lazy author out, since there is virtually no innocent explanation for them. But as Large Language Models have improved, hallucinations like these have grown rarer. And without those dead giveaways, we are left with AI detection tools, which are irreducibly probabilistic. The best of them is Pangram, which boasts a false-positive rate of one in 10,000, given a long enough chunk of text and some reasonable assumptions. Writers accused of AI plagiarism routinely deny it, and there is no way to prove the charge conclusively.

Writing in the Free Press, Tyler Cowen predicts that before long hardly anyone will care whether or not a text was written by a human. Cowen describes the humbling experience of being impressed by an author’s knowledge and scholarly chops, only to discover that there was no author at all. After he was burned a few times, he got better at spotting the signs. In a recent essay, Richard Hanania goes a step further. Suppose we are impressed by the writings of some brilliant young thinker and then discover that every word was machine-generated. “It shouldn’t really matter,” Hanania contends, “and we should hope that this person continues to do the same kind of work.” With the possible exception of memoirs, which are inherently personal, he does not care one way or the other.

But something bugs me about all this. As a writer and non-native speaker of English, I am grateful for Claude’s proofreading help when I am drafting an essay. And as a reader, I have come across AI-generated poems, short stories, and jokes that I have really enjoyed— sometimes I knew their provenance from the start, sometimes I discovered it only later. Far from diminishing my enjoyment, this realisation often heightens it, out of sheer fascination with the technology. But argumentative non-fiction feels different. For some reason, I resent belatedly discovering that an essay that tries to persuade me of something was machine-written, and I lose interest at once. [This is what happened with me and Osman’s writings.] Why is this?

I don’t mind if people use AI to proof, revise, or polish an essay, or even to flesh out a paragraph. But if you let AI compose the piece from beginning to end, there is no author taking responsibility for the views it develops. There is nobody there with whom to have a conversation, nobody who holds the beliefs and attitudes on display. Ask Claude for an eloquent rebuttal of the “Death of France” essay and the result might look every bit as compelling from the other side of that culture war. Perhaps that would go viral, too.

The solution? “Show us the prompts”; that is, disclose what you did and what you fed into AI to let it write. That still doesn’t satisfy me:

There is nothing wrong with using AI to generate text per se, and I do it myself if I am drafting a reference letter, writing a legal defence, or answering a long email. The prompt is usually based on a short list of bullet points and instructions, or on things I have written before. LLMs are extremely good at catching your drift, especially when they have been trained on your earlier writing. It is fine, too, wherever the pleasure is in the artefact rather than the argument: jokes, poetry, perhaps some kinds of fiction.

But if you ask AI to compose an entire argument, then sign it with your name and send it to the Guardian, it behoves you to disclose it and leave your readers to decide whether or not they are still interested. That hardly any writer does this, unlike many creators of AI images and video, suggests a degree of guilty conscience. These people want to preserve the illusion that an actual person produced the text, because they rightly suspect that we would stop reading if we knew the truth.

And, indeed, I’ve stopped reading Osman.  As an exercise, you can enter some suspect prose into Pangram (here; you get three tries per day for free), and see what you get. Try, for example, putting in some fiction or poetry by Jeffrey-Michael Kane.

*The NYT reports that the heirs of a woman who, as a prisoner in Auschwitz, did paintings of “Death Doctor” Josef Mengele’s subjects, are suing to get the paintings back (article archived here).

When Dina Gottliebova Babbitt was a prisoner at the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in the 1940s, she stayed alive by painting watercolors on a rickety easel for Josef Mengele, the Nazi physician known as the “Angel of Death.”

Throughout her life, Babbitt tried to retrieve seven of those works from the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum in Poland. “I want to hold them in my hand,” Babbitt said in a 2009 video just months before she died at 86. “I want them here. I need them.”

But the museum refused to turn them over, asserting that the historical and educational value of the paintings superseded her right of ownership.

Now, Babbitt’s two daughters — Michele Babbitt Kane and Karin Wendy Babbitt — are suing the museum for the return of the watercolor portraits that their mother created while struggling to survive as a Jew in a Nazi death camp.

“Dr. Mengele then took the completed portraits from her,” says the complaint, filed on Monday in United States District Court for the Central District of California. “Dina Gottliebova Babbitt never voluntarily sold, assigned, transferred or relinquished the Watercolors. Yet more than 80 years later, all seven of the Watercolors remain in the possession of the Museum, which claims that it — not Dina Gottliebova Babbitt’s heirs — owns them.”

The Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum, at the former death camp in Poland, defended its decision to hold on to the paintings, describing them as important records of Nazi persecution.

The NYT article shows several of Dina Babbitt‘s paintings (she lived from 1923 to 2009), and here’s a photo from Wikipedia showing her holding a copy of one of her portraits.

This seems to be a no-brainer. The work is that of Babbitt herself and so would seem to belong to her heirs—her daughters. If they want to donate the paintings to a museum, that’s fine, but the work is theirs to have, regardless of its historic interest. The paintings are very good, but I think that reproductions are sufficient to show at Auschwitz. Or do you think otherwise?

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is asking Andrzej increasingly difficult questions. I asked Andrzej what this was about, and he replied, “Chimera – an illusion or fabrication of the mind. Idea separated from reality, which is often pushing (or dragging) people into calamity.”

Hili: Is it possible for a chimera to be a draft animal?
Andrzej: In politics, unfortunately, yes.

In Polish:

Hili: Czy chimera może być zwierzęciem pociągowym?
Ja: W polityce, niestety, tak.

*******************

From Stacy:

From Cats Doing Cat Stuff:

From Terrible Maps: “The most common way to say ‘toe’ across European languages”:

From Luana: Justice in Canada for a man with 43 prior convictions:

And the final update to this saga:

I was just at his sentencing. The prosecution had asked for 15 months in prison because of the randomness and aggression in his assault on me and his extremely long history of violent crime (43 prior convictions).

The defense asked for no… https://t.co/VAIMLgeS8i

— pagliacci the hated 🌝 (@Slatzism) September 18, 2026

I’m with the Number Ten Cat on this one. Trump simply cannot ban from the White House those news outlets he doesn’t like. The courts will back up Larry and me!

Can’t wait for their next lecture on the importance of freedom of speech https://t.co/LDs9FQSsLZ

— Larry the Cat (@Number10cat) September 18, 2026

Two from my feed. First, “journalists” at Al Jazeera were fired en masse:

A few key revelations related to Gaza coverage in last few days:

– Almost all of the media in Gaza were in a Hamas-run WhatsApp group that dictated and coordinated coverage. Including contributors to major western news organizations.

– Al Jazeera fired 24 of their media members… pic.twitter.com/Lpwl2wbqpN

— AG (@AGHamilton29) September 19, 2026

FAT BEAR WEEK IS STARTING!

Yes, my friends, it is that time of year: the leaves begin to change colors, the temperature cools, and the time-honored tradition of rooting for your favorite chonky bears at Katmai National Park & Preserve begins.

Fat Bear Week starts Tuesday: https://t.co/hHhBXv3T0L pic.twitter.com/ISSNe50nGT

— U.S. Department of the Interior (@Interior) September 19, 2026

One I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:

These two Dutch Jewish children were gassed to death as soon as they arrived in Auschwitz. The boy was three years old. https://t.co/hHLKI9UaG5

— Jerry Coyne (@Evolutionistrue) September 20, 2026

And two from Doctor Cobb, both involving kitties:

I comb my cat every Saturday morning. And then he always feels the need to wash me back. I’m sure he thinks I’m a cat too. Cute but gross 😂 So always comb him pre my morning shower. #caturday

— Steve Portugal (@sjportugal.bsky.social) 2026-09-19T16:20:03.785Z

There’s a big argument about whether this is an AI-generated photo. I don’t care; I like the sign. Click on the post to go to the original:

Welcome to shabbos for Jewish cats, Saturday, September 19, 2026, with Yom Kippur beginning at sunset tomorrow and lasting 24 hours. It is the Day of Atonement—the holiest day in the Jewish calendar.  You cannot have any food or water during the entire period, or even brush your teeth (you might ingest water!).  And you’re not allowed to touch or kiss your wife/husband, and must sleep in separate beds. You can see the other rules here, though most Jews aren’t that observant and won’t follow them.

It’s also National Gymnastics Day, and in honor of that I present the first perfect 10 score in gymnastics, Romanian Nadia Comǎneci on the uneven bars in the 1976 Montreal Olympics.  Wikipedia also has a list of “perfect 10 gymnastics” performances for both men and women.  Here are the top five performances on the parallel bars in Montreal, with Comǎneci’s performance last, starting at 2:31:

It’s also Astronomy Day, Batman Day (celebrating the batster’s 75th anniversary in 2014), International Eat an Apple Day, International Red Panda Day, International Talk Like a Pirate Day, National Butterscotch Pudding Day, and Thank a Police Officer Day (the DSA will not be endorsing this).

ARRRRRR!

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the September 9 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*The NYT reports that AOC has donated  $300,000 to help NY state Democrats, and will be campaigning across the state this fall (article archived here).

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez plans to campaign across New York in the weeks before the midterm elections, and she has donated $300,000 to help boost the Democratic ticket in her home state as speculation has swirled over whether she will run for Senate or president in 2028.

In an interview, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez said she would be “traveling across the state to boost turnout in many different areas,” including planned stops in Buffalo, Syracuse and Ithaca in the coming weeks.

“New York,” she said, “has become increasingly relevant to whether we have a majority or not in the House of Representatives.”

Ms. Ocasio-Cortez will donate the funds to a pool of money for Democrats statewide that is being overseen by Gov. Kathy Hochul, who is seeking re-election this year. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez has earmarked the funds for voter organizing rather than advertising, with a specific proviso that half of the money be devoted to Spanish-language outreach.

“This investment is really not just about throwing money around and putting points on the board,” she said. “This is actually about transforming the way Democrats go about building a coalition.”

Sarafina Chitika, a spokeswoman for Ms. Hochul, said that the statewide effort, known as a coordinated campaign because it helps candidates for various offices, would be “prioritizing communities that are too often overlooked and written off.”

The sum is more symbolic than financially significant in a state as expansive and expensive as New York. It is also more money, though, than any other member of the New York delegation has contributed, according to two people familiar with the donation. Ms. Hochul had asked Ms. Ocasio-Cortez for the contribution, which had been under discussion for several weeks.

Ms. Ocasio-Cortez is one of the Democratic Party’s top fund-raisers nationwide and has raised more than $32 million since the start of 2025. She entered the summer with $15 million in the bank.

Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, whose district includes parts of the Bronx and Queens, suggested that there should not be much reading of tea leaves into her announcement as she weighs a political future with at least three options: re-election, a New York Senate race or a presidential run in 2028.

“I’ve been pretty open about the fact that I’m going to be weighing this decision, but I’m going to be weighing it after the midterm elections,” she said.

The fact that Ms. Ocasio-Cortez previously clashed with Jay Jacobs, the state party chairman, appears to at least partly explain why she chose to direct the money to the Hochul operation.

“It’s no secret that I’ve had my criticisms about the Democratic Party in the state in the past,” Ms. Ocasio-Cortez said, adding she felt “more confident” giving the money to the effort being overseen by Ms. Hochul.

I’d be willing to bet that AOC, who has ambitions as big as her record is thin, will run for Senator, given that (I think) her chances to win the Presidency is small.  But even as a Senator she’d have more power than she deserves, as she’s accomplished little in the House save promote herself. Yes, she’s good at that, and she’s a Democratic Socialist, so the kids like her, but as a politician, she’s a disaster for someone of my stripe.

*Reader Peter N. called my attention to a piece on slime molds in the Guardian, a piece that makes you question the notion of intelligence, and whether it can be seen in amoeba-like organisms that have no neurons: “‘This is dangerous: slime molds and the bitter debate over the nature of intelligence.” Because I’ll give a few quotes at length, I am giving only four news sources today.

Forty years ago, as an undergraduate in Hokkaido, Toshiyuki Nakagaki came upon a lemon-yellow stain in a petri dish. That encounter turned him into a doyen of slime mould research – and fed a storm of biological and philosophical debate about the meanings of life and intelligence that persists to this day. Before, no one would have called a slime mould “intelligent”; the popular adjective, in fact, was “simple”. “A simple mass of protoplasm,” one 1895 description ran; “among the most simple of organisms”, said another. And it was hard to argue otherwise. A slime mould can appear to be just a small cell, capable only of feeding and reproducing. Simple is as simple does.

Of that first meeting, Nakagaki said: “I was just impressed with how fast it moved.” Physarum polycephalum, the slime mould species in that petri dish, has a top speed of 1cm an hour. For amoebic organisms, that’s gold-medal standard. At first glance, Physarum seems to spread as irregularly as ink on blotting paper, but in fact it senses its meals of bacteria or other microbes and reaches for them with a long, thin finger of protoplasm – which not only digests its food but then forages further or pulls back into the rest of the mould. It’s impossible to watch a slime mould over many days without sensing some deliberation at play.

. . . .In 2000, his astonishing research began to surface in the media. “Slime mould solves maze puzzle,” one headline ran, summarising an experiment in which Nakagaki induced a Physarum to find the shortest route through a maze in search of food. (In labs, slime moulds are reared on oat flakes, a convenient diet that can double as a researcher’s breakfast.) In 2010, the New York Times wrote about Nakagaki’s most famous experiment – the canonical study that scientists offhandedly call “the Tokyo railway one”. Nakagaki placed oat flakes to resemble the map of Tokyo and 35 of its satellite towns. Then he let the Physarum loose from the centre of “Tokyo”. From that one metropolitan oat, the mould spread outwards seeking the others, stretching towards them with its tubules. Then, putting out more branches, it linked up with itself, from one suburban oat flake to the next.

In doing all this, the mould displayed such a verve for efficiency – no wasted motion, an optimal pursuit of its food – that it ended up nearly retracing the route map of the greater Tokyo area’s railway system. Nearly, Nakagaki said – because, in fact, free of human bias or politicking, Physarum may have improved the design of the network. Later, when Nakagaki twice won the Ig Nobel – the prize for research that is both amusing and thought-provoking – the first award cited his maze paper in the field of “cognitive science”, but the second, cheekily, hailed the Tokyo railway study as a breakthrough in “transportation planning”.

. . . For more than a century, scientists were sure that cognition and intelligence required neurons, the cells that make up brains and nervous systems. These neurons form and reform connections between themselves to create pathways for thought and memory. This understanding of intelligence was an implicit argument that animals occupy a special place within the living kingdom – separate to plants and microbes – and that humans are most special of all.

But since the 1980s, more and more scientists have argued that traits such as cognition are intrinsic not just to animals but to all life – a stance that Pamela Lyon, a philosopher at Adelaide University, calls “biogenic”.

. . . . Given that the mould has no brain, slime is evolution’s way of “storing” memories of spaces. One of Reid’s experiments suggests Physarum uses its slime as an aide-memoire to recognise the paths it has travelled and those it hasn’t. The yellow slime, sticky but more watery than human mucus, is a soup of sugars and proteins. Its presence, Reid believes, tells a mould that it has already foraged in these parts and consumed any food there was to be had. When Reid’s team harvested slime from a mould, coated one route in a maze with it, and introduced the mould into this set-up, it nearly always chose to traverse the dry, un-slimed areas. More impressively, the Physarum can distinguish between its own slime and that discharged by of other species – as if Hansel could tell his breadcrumb trail apart from Gretel’s.

Over the past three decades, as the study of intelligence has broadened beyond humans, slime-mould research has gathered speed. We know now that Physarum is made up of thousands of tiny oscillators that sense their environment. If they pick up the chemical markers of a meal, these units oscillate faster, in turn causing the cell’s protoplasm to flow more thickly towards that area. This is how the mould moves.

But how these oscillators, so minuscule and seemingly so rudimentary, manage to sense so much – proteins, salts, acidity, light, heat, humidity, perhaps even gravitational and magnetic fields, and masses looming at a distance – is still unclear. In 2008, Nakagaki and his colleagues subjected a Physarum to cold, dry air streamed at regular hourly intervals, prompting it to slow its locomotion. After three such gusts, the mould spontaneously slowed on the top of the fourth hour – even when the mistral didn’t blow. No one can figure out how the slime mould keeps time.

. . .The truths are rooted in semantics. Unlike, say, the word “haemoglobin”, terms such as “cognition” have been around for so long that they’ve been coded into colloquial use in phrases such as “cognitive decline” and “cognitive bias”. To freely stretch the word beyond its wider connotation of the workings of a brain – to apply it to brainless beings such as slime moulds – “misleads the public”, Alex Kacelnik, a zoologist at the University of Oxford told me. “It hollows out the word itself.”

Kacelnik, who has studied the New Caledonian crow’s nimble use of tools, pointed out that “even an oak tree ‘decides’ – in inverted commas – how many acorns it will produce, what size each acorn is going to be, and when it will shed them. But when people say they’re going to cognitive therapy, they mean something different from what the oak is doing, right?” Misusing the word, he said, is counterproductive. By likening the tree’s function to cognition, “you haven’t solved the problem of how the oak does what it does – you’ve just trivialised it, or defined it out of existence”. He uses the term “cognition” in his own writing only when he can show that it involves “some kind of internal algorithm, with some kind of concept formation, in some kind of ‘language’ – in inverted commas”.

IU agree with Kacelnik in that we’re projecting when we ascribe “intelligence” to a creature like a slime mold, regardless of how highly evolved it is to do cool stuff. It doesn’t use neurons, but chemical cues, and to ascribe “cognition” to it—something I think is key to “intelligence”—is misguided. In fact, to argue whether it is “intelligent” or not seems to me the wrong path to take.  What we can do is marvel at, and figure out, how this protist can do all this stuff, and even do experiments to see how it evolved. Even tiny organisms like these are the products of millions of years of evolution, and can show adaptations that boggle the mind (think of all the amazing things ants do with a brain the size of a dot made by a pencil).

There’s a lot more to this article, and a lot of word-parsing and philosophizing. In the end, I think the problem is semantic, but I’d prefer to think of “intelligence” as requiring cognition—an ability to reason.

Here’s ZeFrank’s segment on slime molds:

*The NYT reports that the new Merriam-Webster dictionary is “Wordsmaxxing with 1400 new definitions” (article archived here). As you know, you have to be au courant with language, so here are some new words:

Merriam-Webster, the venerable dictionary that traces its roots to a time before looksmaxxing and yacht rock, has added those words along with chili crisp, shapewear and cuffing season, to its comprehensive accounting of the English language.

The company, based in Springfield, Mass., announced on Tuesday that it had added those five terms and 1,395 other new definitions to its online dictionary, Merriam-Webster.com. Many will also be added to upcoming editions of the print dictionary.

Merriam-Webster is the oldest dictionary publisher in America. It traces its start to 1843, when the brothers George and Charles Merriam bought the rights to the 1841 edition of Noah Webster’s dictionary. The company emphasizes that the dictionary is not a static catalog, but a reflection of the many different ways words are used by real people.

That includes food-related words that have become more commonly used in the United States like superfood, “a food (such as salmon, broccoli, or blueberries) that is rich in nutrients,” and shishito, “a slender usually mild chili pepper of East Asia.” On the sweeter side, the dictionary added cake pop, “a compressed ball of cake crumbs and icing that is dipped in a usually chocolate or sugary coating,” for the uninitiated.

Anyone who dreads going to work or school might be familiar with the Sunday scaries, the “feelings of anxiety or sadness that arise on Sunday from the knowledge that the weekend is almost over.” And people who know Braden Peters, the proudly vain social media influencer known as Clavicular, might be familiar, for better or worse, with looksmaxxing. Merriam-Webster calls it “the practice of taking one or more sometimes extreme or dangerous measures intended to increase one’s physical attractiveness.”

Yes, we discussed that odious word last week. But wait! There’s more!

. . . .Fans of Christopher Cross, Kenny Loggins and Michael McDonald might be pleased to see that yacht rock made the cut. Merriam-Webster defines it as “a style of soft rock music originating in the 1970s and 1980s.”

Also clearing the bar was cuffing season, “a time of the year when people who are not married or in a relationship begin looking for a short-term romantic partner to spend the colder months of the year with.”

Merriam-Webster also added parasocial, “a one-sided emotional connection with someone (especially a celebrity or fictional character) whom one does not know personally,” and Rickroll, “to trick (someone) into hearing the song ‘Never Gonna Give You Up’ by English singer Rick Astley.”

The only one I know of these, save “looksmaxxing”, is Rickroll, and I like that one.

*As always, I’m stealing a few items from Nellie Bowles’s weekly news-and-snark column at The Free Press, called this week, “TGIF: Experts fear worse ahead.”

→ Ed Sheeran debacle: Ed Sheeran decided to have Macklemore as his tour opening act, and the rapper took the stage to give a “Free Palestine” speech, like he was kicking off a course at Columbia or something. In the long debate about whether anti-Zionism is antisemitism, Macklemore leaves little doubt, in that he once performed wearing a fake beard and an oversized prosthetic nose in what was widely seen as a Jewish caricature. Anyway, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft then pressured Ed Sheeran’s promoters to drop Macklemore, and Macklemore was dropped. You can imagine what happened next. Macklemore has become even more of a hero, gaining hundreds of thousands of followers, bringing more attention to the cause. All of Ed Sheeran’s other opening acts backed out of the tour, as did his own backing band. For a sense of the public tone, comedian Mike Recine posted: “Robert Kraft is a pedophile and someone should kill him.” So it’s all going really well, temperature’s nice and low out here. Recine deleted his initial, um, joke? and posted: “Hey everyone I’d like to apologize for the post I made last night when I said ’Children deserve to have legs.’ I didn’t realize that statement was offensive to the Jewish community and I will choose my words better moving forward.”

The idea here being, I guess, that Jews love to kill children, or at least blast their legs off, so telling people to assassinate Robert Kraft is the same as saying you want to save children. So, by extension, then, being pro–Robert Kraft’s life equals wanting to remove Palestinian children’s legs.

All the former pro–cancel culture people are suddenly screaming “free speech,” which is always just so funny, and they point out the same hypocrisy in the anti–cancel culture people, who are suddenly saying deplatforming is a private company’s decision. Fair critique of both sides. But it’s all word games. The fact is, antisemitism is popular right now, and the Bob Krafts of the world cannot win. You either host the man who hates you and wants you in a work camp—or you make him even more of a star. Those are your options, Bob. Choose wisely, and if I were you, I’d probably stay away from your own venue for fear of the mobs.

→ Quote of the week: Here’s the latest scandal from Hasan Piker, the top political influencer on the left and a frequent campaign buddy for Dems.

Because I’m in the United States of America, the most dogshit country on the fucking planet, the absolute worst country on the planet, straight up, bar none. A capitalist shithole. The absolute worst fuckin’ place on the planet, just a horrific, monstrous, awful, dogshit country that I fucking despise. The absolute fuckin’ worst country that has the most—the most—wealth throughout history, throughout time, the wealthiest nation on the planet, and we don’t have a fraction of the dedicated broadband speed that you can get in a fucking village on the countryside of France. Okay? I just—the worst fucking infrastructure, the absolute biggest shithole on the planet, I fucking despise this nation. I despise this country with my entire fuckin’ heart. Okay?”

Okay! That’s right, while livestreaming from his gorgeous West Hollywood home, the Wi-Fi got a little wobbly, and so Hasan went nuclear. America is his mom, and she’s being a total bitch. This is what young people love shooting directly into their veins. “Dogshit country that I fucking despise.” Get this guy a swear jar and he might end up as poor as the people he pretends to advocate for!

In late-breaking news, Piker also sat down with Alex Thompson of Axios: “Do you think America then is worse than al-Qaeda?” Piker: “Pound for pound as far as the number of deaths, yes.” Perfect.

→ Testing, testing: New York State’s Regents exams are three-hour tests on subjects like English, math, and science. Students need a score of 65 on multiple exams to pass and get a high school diploma. But now New York’s planning on dropping the requirement. Here’s New York Board of Regents member Felicia Thomas-Williams on the change: “Maybe you’ve seen the cartoon where you have a fish climb a tree? You don’t assess a fish on climbing a tree because fish can’t climb trees.” If the Regents exam asked students to breathe underwater, then Felicia’s argument might track. But the exam asks students to read, write, and solve math problems—skills that are standard for most educated human beings. Or should be? Of course this test was dropped as a requirement for vaguely anti-racist reasons that no one bothered to really explain. But now: What will New York high school students have to prove in order to graduate? Will they just fill out a feelings wheel? Are they going to play Go Fish for 40 minutes and call it a day? That’s insane for the public school system. Playing games at school costs at least $50,000 at a private school in Santa Monica.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is being bribed with beef:

Hili: Sometimes even a cat has had enough of everything.
Andrzej: Do you want a piece of beef?
Hili: That’s psychological manipulation.

Hili: Czasem nawet kot ma już wszystkiego dość.

Ja: Chcesz kawałek wołowiny.

Hili: To jest psychomanipulacja.

*******************

From Cats Doing Cat Stuff:

From Things With Faces; happy suds!

And from somewhere on Facebook; spot the cat!

Here’s a message from Masih to Mojtaba Khamenei, who may well not be alive to receive it:

This is a gift from me and the women of #WhiteWednesdays to you @khamenei_ir
💃🏻💃🏻🌻🌻💃🏻💃🏻 pic.twitter.com/E4MpqjCgiQ

— Masih Alinejad (@AlinejadMasih) September 18, 2026

From Luana.  The NYT, well, I can’t say it on a family-friendly site:

What the f**k is this, @nytimes? pic.twitter.com/ncXTtDvQnL

— Eitan Fischberger (@EFischberger) September 16, 2026

Math fun from reader Bryan:

Carl Friedrich Gauss, often called the “Prince of Mathematicians,” famously described mathematics as the “queen of the sciences” and number theory as the “queen of mathematics.”

I think prime numbers are the oxygen of number theory. They are the fundamental building blocks of… pic.twitter.com/F0WLsEyaMS

— Math Files (@Math_files) September 17, 2026

It appears that the Number Ten Cat caught another mouse: his fourth in about fifteen years:

Still got it. pic.twitter.com/gNrdeymvgP

— Larry the Cat (@Number10cat) September 18, 2026

Tw0 from my feed. I think the Democrats are finally realizing that Hasan Piker is a liability. What a dumb party we are! Here’s Rahm Emanuel:

Now that he won’t stop talking, the folks who told us Hasan Piker is a serious voice who should be listened to ought to let us know which of these positions we’re supposed to take seriously:

1. That “pound for pound,” America is worse than al-Qaeda – a ridiculous statement on a…

— Rahm Emanuel (@RahmEmanuel) September 18, 2026

Cats helping out:

Good Morning!
Cats. When not needed, but want to be included. 😅 pic.twitter.com/9B28vR2rHK

— Bluegrasspatriot (@kylawndog) September 18, 2026

One I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:

This Dutch Jewish boy was gassed to death as soon as he arrived in Auschwitz. He was eight years old. https://t.co/c462awbT5T

— Jerry Coyne (@Evolutionistrue) September 19, 2026

And one from Herr Dr. Professor Cobb, which he calls, “Nearly a caracal”:

It's amazing that perhaps the world's best place to see an awesome wild cat – the caracal – is right on the edge of a big city. Climbed #TableMountain today from #CapeTown with a tiny hope of seeing one, & was delighted to find some poo. Half the joy of #MammalWatching is just knowing they're there

— Jack Ashby (@jackdashby.bsky.social) 2026-09-16T15:45:16.469Z

Welcome to Friday, September 18, 2026, and National Ice Cream Cone Day.  There are two types of people: cone people and cup people. I like to eat the cone, though sometimes it gets drippy, but I’ll take the cup if a place gives you more ice cream in a cup. The history of the cone as a container for ice cream is murky. Wikipedia says this:

The earliest certain evidence of ice cream cones come from Mrs A. B. Marshall’s Book of Cookery (1888), written by the English cook Agnes B. Marshall.^]Her recipe for “Cornet with Cream” said that “the cornets were made with almonds and baked in the oven, not pressed between irons”. Marshall is consequently often regarded to have been the inventor of the modern ice cream cone.

Here’s one that looks good: a green tea ice cream cone made with matcha.

It’s also International Grenache Day, National Cheeseburger Day, National Red Velvet Cake Day, and National Rice Krispies Treats Day.

Speaking of cheeseburgers:

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the September 18 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*The WSJ reports that Iran is in trouble vis-à-vis exporting oil; the article is “Iran’s attempts to get around the Hormuz blockade are hitting a wall.”

Iran vowed to respond to a U.S. blockade by pushing more trade overland. On the ground, it isn’t going according to plan.

Hundreds of Iranian truck drivers are currently stuck at Iran’s border with Pakistan, unable to send their goods into Tehran’s neighbor. They say they are facing worsening bureaucratic hurdles and costs, many caused by their own government. The same thing is happening at Iran’s land borders with Turkey, Turkmenistan and Afghanistan, dealing Tehran a self-inflicted blow and throttling trade through its few remaining economic release valves.

Tons of stranded apricots have been spoiled because of the delays. Lucrative cargoes of iron ore, cement and bottled gas are stuck at entry points to the Pakistani and Afghan borders, truckers say.

“Neither Iran is taking responsibility for the situation, nor is Pakistan allowing us to unload our cargo,” one driver says in a video posted by the Union of Truckers and Drivers Organizations Across Iran over the weekend.

The economic war in the Persian Gulf is dictated as much by how much the countries in the region can move their exports over land rather than through the Strait of Hormuz. Some have found workarounds. Saudi Arabia is moving more of its oil west across the Arabian Peninsula. The U.S. Navy is helping some of the Gulf nations shift their oil through the strait.

Iran’s attempts are faltering. The U.S. is isolating its economy with new sanctions and launching strikes on Iranian tankers in reprisal for Tehran’s attacks on its Navy, collapsing seaborne exports.

In another setback for Iran’s plans to bypass Hormuz, the country’s Mahan Air, which is sanctioned by the U.S., said Wednesday that it was suspending flights to Oman and Turkey, state-affiliated media in Tehran said. Last week, the U.S. Treasury imposed new sanctions on companies it said were supporting Mahan, which operates cargo and passenger services.

The U.S. blockade has also hurt Iran’s imports of basic goods, 70% of which normally go through the blockaded ports. Though humanitarian goods and food are ostensibly exempt, the reality is that shippers are reluctant to service Iran.

Videos posted on social media last week show cranes at the Port of Shahid Rajaee, Iran’s largest commercial container port, at a standstill. Thousands of containers are stranded in ports in Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, transportation professionals in Tehran last month told the Mehr News Agency, which is affiliated with Iranian security services.

Even Iraq is blockading Iranian goods:

But in a sign of how vulnerable the alternative routes are, Iraq over the weekend temporarily closed cargo terminals at the Iran border after alleging Iran had used its territory to attack Saudi Arabia. On Sunday, trucks carrying Iranian onions bound for Iraq were forced to turn back as a result, according to Tehran’s Central Fruit and Vegetable Market.

The rising costs are now adding to Iran’s worsening inflation problem.

. . . Much of these costs are being passed on to consumers, with unpredictable results for the Iranian leadership. Food inflation rose to 128% in August, according to Iran’s official statistics office.

*I said I’d report back on reactions to the new anti-Israel movie “NAZA,” which accuses of Israel of deliberately killing civilians in a way not according to their strategy (“the military gains must outweight the civilian losses”, or something like that). There’s one in the Free Press by their Middle East analyst Haviv Rettig Gur, “Hold your applause for the new Gaza documentary“, with the subtitle “There may yet be hard truths in ‘NAZA,’ including evidence of Israel’s systemic failures. But the reporting around it treats flimsy claims as proof of criminality.” (Note: like nearly everyone weighing in, Gur hasn’t seen the movie).

The title is an Israeli military acronym derived from nezek agavi, Hebrew for collateral damage. It refers to the filmmakers’ conviction that the systems Israel used to select targets and authorize strikes in Gaza enabled immoral and unlawfully high rates of civilian casualties. Their allegation goes beyond excessive tolerance of civilian casualties: They reportedly contend that the killing was intentional.

I haven’t seen the film. This means I cannot confidently assess its editing, corroboration, or the full testimony it presents. I would love to live in a world in which I could wait, watch the movie, and have a sober debate about its claims. Unfortunately, the discourse online is not so patient. That’s why it’s necessary to examine the argument its makers have published, the reporting on which it builds, and the standards by which its allegations should be judged. The film falls short on every dimension.

Start with the question of civilian casualties. The online conversation about the film—as distinct from the film’s own claims—is replete with shock and horror at the finding that the IDF calculated the estimated number of civilian deaths before each strike. According to the usual Israel critics, this shows that the resulting deaths amounted to deliberate murder.

It’s almost impossible to overstate how clownishly (and intentionally) wrong this claim is. International humanitarian law requires those planning an attack to assess foreseeable civilian harm and take feasible precautions to avoid or minimize it. You can’t assess proportionality in relation to the expected military advantage of a strike—as required by law—without that calculation. Indeed, an attack that isn’t preceded by an assessment of potential civilian deaths is an immoral attack. This point isn’t against the film itself, but it says something important about how skewed and shallow and preordained the debate around it was always going to be.

So what does the film itself claim? In their published accounts, the filmmakers describe interviews with 24 former IDF soldiers, most of them intelligence officers. They claim that civilian losses were authorized for targets of little military value, and that in some cases, the intended target was not present. According to the soldiers, these were features of the system, not departures from its protocols.

Those are substantive claims. But I have seen nothing to suggest that they are proven in the film itself. What I do know is that neither the filmmakers nor their production or research teams presented any of the findings to the IDF for a response. In fact, the IDF has publicly asked the filmmakers to screen the documentary for military officials so it can produce a detailed response; so far it’s not clear they have responded.

So, when we Israelis do finally see the film, we will ask the most basic journalistic questions: How are its claims established? What did each witness—all of them anonymous—actually observe, and what was their role and level of access? Does an officer describing one phase of the targeting process know what happened during the rest? Are any of these claims corroborated in any independent way? When someone says a target had little military value, what information is that judgment based on?

Nobody has to prove a system-wide policy for the unjustified killing of a particular individual or family to be wrong, and deserving of an investigation. But the film’s claim isn’t about a single strike, or even a number of them. It is that the IDF’s collateral-damage mitigation system is used to systematically and purposefully target civilians. That this was the purpose of the military campaign.

One of the few Israelis who’s had the chance to watch the film—and who is sympathetic to director Yuval Avraham—came away deeply disappointed. In a Monday op-ed in Haaretz, a left-wing Israeli outlet most likely to resonate with the film’s claims, Raviv Drucker wrote that he couldn’t help but feel the film was trying to create an “impression” of the “context in which these terrible things were done”—juxtaposing military claims about suffering in Gaza with images of people dining in Tel Aviv. He simultaneously vouches for Avraham’s integrity while complaining that the film fails to prove or contextualize its claims. According to Avraham, NAZA doesn’t say anything meaningful about the broader military context (which is necessary to prove that strikes had no military need), compare how other armies fight terrorist organizations embedded in civilian populations, or even acknowledge the problem of Hamas’s systematic use of civilian infrastructure. Drucker’s conclusion is written in a tone of sadness and disappointment, not anger. He wishes, he writes, that the film had been “truer to reality.”

Gur also shows that director Yuval Abraham deliberately distorted the number of Palestinian civilian dead in a previous publication, and that the targeting restrictions changed over the course of the war for military reasons. In the end, Gur doesn’t say Israel is exculpated, but does say this:

All this said, legitimate findings of the film should be taken seriously. Dramatically changed military circumstances do not suspend rules of proportionality or offer blanket justification for whatever followed. And even if the film turns out to be as dishonest, the civilian toll in Gaza requires examination.

But these questions do at least set a standard that a film must meet to show the immorality it claims. Will it? Did the filmmakers even try?

We’re going to have to wait, though it’s hard for me to believe that the IDF deliberately wanted to kill civilians without adequate military justification. I’m not quite sure why this film is not being shown to everybody who wants to see it, including the IDF. That alone makes me suspicious.

*At the German site Cicero, emeritus professor Werner Kunz at Heinrich Heine University in Düsseldorf, described how one of his big lectures was canceled, and he was relieved of his teaching duties, all for comparing the objective existence of two biological sexes with the objective existence of biological species.  (h/t Luana)

In the fall of 2025, I received an invitation to give a lecture on nature conservation in June 2026 at the “Friends of the Botanical Garden” association at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (HHU). I have a long-standing connection to this association and have given several lectures there in previous years. I know the chairman personally and have met with him on numerous occasions for private discussions. My lecture, scheduled for June 2026, required extensive preparation and was to be recorded on video for YouTube. People from other universities were planning to attend. Just two days before the lecture, I had preparatory discussions with the chairman. 

And then it happened. Less than 24 hours before the lecture was due to begin, late in the evening, I received an email from the chairman informing me that the lecture had to be canceled. The letter stated, among other things: “We are aware of several previous statements made by you, which have already been discussed in the past and have led to corresponding decisions by the university… After thorough examination and discussions with the relevant departments of HHU, we have come to the conclusion that these statements are incompatible with the principles that HHU and the Friends Association, as organizers, stand for…”

The source of the controversy remains unnamed. 

What had I done wrong? The “responsible departments of HHU” never identified themselves to me, and nothing was ever “discussed in the past.” I don’t know who was discussing this. The rejection letter from the “Friends of the Botanical Garden” only mentions an “equal opportunities organization.”

My assumption stems from the module “Fundamentals of Biodiversity and Evolution” that I taught in 2024. A key part of this module’s content involved explaining the biological concept of a species. The species concept can only be explained by comparing the characteristics that distinguish two species with those that differentiate the two sexes. This was therefore also part of the curriculum.

Several students complained vehemently about my statements regarding gender differences during the subsequent evaluation of the course and even filed a complaint against me. My statements were reinterpreted as an alleged verbatim statement that “women cannot think.” I never made such a statement and never would, because it would be utterly absurd. The lawyers of the “Network for Academic Freedom” describe the whole affair as an “outrageous incident” and have already stated in an “Open Letter to the Executive Board of HHU” that this is based on a statement that was never made, the assertion of which constitutes the criminal offense of defamation under Section 187 of the German Criminal Code.

Removal from office without debate

The equal opportunities officer of the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, who also chairs the Biology Research Unit, accepted this statement as true and immediately relieved me of all my teaching duties (including supervising bachelor’s theses) without verifying the students’ alleged statements and without granting me the right to a discussion and defense. The examination board and the second supervisors of my bachelor’s students’ theses were not consulted. Yet, my ethical conduct could easily have been verified on my website. The majority of my bachelor’s, diploma, and doctoral students, as well as most of the co-authors of my publications, were women. I was powerless to challenge my immediate dismissal from all my teaching positions, which I had continued to hold without pay after my retirement, because I no longer had any legal right to teach.

It was apparently these events, which took place almost two years ago, that forced the chairman of the “Friends of the Botanical Garden” to cancel my aforementioned lecture at short notice, with the words: “We have become aware of several previous statements made by you, which have already been discussed in the past and have led to corresponding decisions by the university…”

Again we see a professor penalized after ridiculous student accusations.  Species, like sexes, are not “defined” but “recognized”. Yes of course there are cases where species are not absolutely distinguished, though those (particularly when allopatric) are much more frequent than individuals who are neither male nor female (about 1/5600 or less).  But in both cases we are dealing are biological realities that exist independent of definition (e.g., H. sapiens doesn’t blur into any other species, nor do Pallas cats or platypuses). Just as nature is lumpy with respect to types of animals and plants, so is nature lumpy with respect to the kinds of animals that produce gametes (in that case there are two lumps). They really should apologize to professor Kunz.

*Since I was in graduate school there has been discussion of whether dinosaurs might have been warm-blooded, a view promoted most vigorously by Robert Bakker. The NYT now reports that,using new methods, scientists believe that Tyrannosaurus rex was warm-blooded, with a body temperature close to ours (article archived here).

The last vestiges of warmth drained out of a Tyrannosaurus rex’s body around 66 million years ago, but scientists just used chemistry to take the long-extinct dinosaur’s temperature: 97 degrees, give or take a few.

The new finding securely situates the king of the dinosaurs among the warm-blooded animals, confirming previous years of research.

T. rex ran hot, but not too hot, according to the study, published Wednesday in Science Advances. Instead, the reading places it somewhere on the body-temperature spectrum near large mammals like Indian elephants (97 degrees) or humans (98 degrees) or flightless birds like ostriches (101 to 103 degrees) — but nowhere near the heat of a chicken, say (105 to 107 degrees).

“That is absolutely spectacular,” said Jasmina Wiemann, a molecular paleobiologist at Johns Hopkins, who was not involved in the study.

So how did they do it?

To take the body temperature of a long extinct, school-bus-size predator, scientists at the University of California, Los Angeles, used a clever geochemistry technique on fossilized teeth, including two from “Thomas,” a famous T. rex in the collection of the National History Museum of Los Angeles County.

The team first used a dental drill to sample the tough outer enamel from the teeth, and then took advantage of a remarkable fact: The chemical bonds within minerals can tell their own stories.

“Basically, at the point a mineral forms there are elements of its chemistry that are kind of frozen in time,” said Robert Eagle, a geobiologist and one of the leaders of the study.

. . . Dr. Eagle and his colleagues analyzed the bonds between two isotopes; heavier versions of both carbon and oxygen. Those bonds acted like a thermometer: The more bonds present, the lower the body temperature.

For a gut check, they also compared the T. rex teeth to those of ancient crocodilians excavated from the same site Hell Creek Formation in Montana. T. rex measured 97 degrees; the crocodilians ran much cooler at, on average, 88 degrees.

Being warm-blooded is associated with a more active lifestyle and means the “tyrant lizard” could live in a broad range of environments. The researchers calculated that, at least from a temperature tolerance point of view, T. rex could have roamed over most of the North American continent, from Alaska to Mexico.

. . .Stephen Brusatte, a paleontologist at the University of Edinburgh, pointed out in an email that the body temperature reading opens up a whole new set of questions about how this celebrity dinosaur operated.

One possibility is that T. rex was warm-blooded the way humans are, with a constant and hot body temperature regulated by an internal furnace, Dr. Brusatte said. Another possibility is that T. rex was more like a giant, terrifying insulated coffee cup that takes forever to cool down.

The way to answer that question, at least tentatively, is to look at the chemical bonds in relatives of T. rex that were not so big, and so would cool down quickly. If they also showed evidence of warm-bloodedness, particularly in very small dinos, that would suggest that homeothermy was an ancestral trait.

Here’s a figure from the paper comparing the isotopically-calculated body temperatures from various groups, along with the environmentally calcualted temperature (see the paper for free here to read more):

*According to the AP’s Odd News, corn mazes featuring Dolly Parton are cropping up all over the UK and Canada, most of them started before Dolly even died.

Dolly Parton ’s megawatt smile and big wavy locks are gracing fields across the U.S. and Canada this fall.

Twenty farms have carved out large corn mazes to honor the late country music icon, actor and philanthropist and raise money for her Imagination Library, which provides free books to children.

The “Jolene” crooner’s death due to cancer on Aug. 25 in Nashville at age 80 brought an outpouring of tributes. They ranged from a drive to rename the country music capital’s airport in Parton’s honor to a surge in online streams of “9 to 5,” “Islands in the Stream” and her many other hit songs.

Now she is being immortalized in corn, with the mazes located in about a dozen states and two provinces, from Alabama to California and Ohio to Texas. Most also feature a Parton-themed trivia game, photo ops and other offerings.

Brett Herbst, founder of The Maize Inc., the Utah-based consulting company that designed the mazes, called Parton a “true American treasure.”

The company said the mazes were in the works months before Parton died and are part of its annual campaign honoring country music’s brightest stars. Previous honorees included Reba McEntire in 2023, Luke Bryan in 2024 and Lainey Wilson in 2025.

Parton, who famously grew up poor in rural Tennessee, thanked organizers for supporting her charity before to her death. In a statement provided by The Maize Inc., she encouraged people to “get lost in this year’s country music corn maze for a little fun, laughter and a real good reason to get lost.”

Here’s a video:

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is becoming quite philosophical:

Hili: I look and wonder?
Andrzej: What about?
Hili: Where does time disappear to?

In Polish:

Hili: patrzę i zastanawiam się?
Ja: Nad czym?
Hili: Gdzie ucieka czas?

*************

From Stacy:

From Give Me a Sign:

From Things with Faces:

From Masih. who got a prestigious honorary degree from The New School, and used the occasion to reiterate the woes of the Iranian people:

I received an honorary doctorate from a university in America. It should have been one of the happiest and proudest days of my life.

But that very morning, the Islamic Republic executed three young protesters for taking part in the Woman, Life, Freedom uprising.

I cried all… pic.twitter.com/wWYeQ3Vu1m

— Masih Alinejad (@AlinejadMasih) September 17, 2026

From Luana, and not a surprise: “inclusive excellence”:

I thought the tweet below must be omitting some critical context or paraphrasing the text ungenerously.

But no, the NYT actually published an op-ed that claims the University of California hasn’t sacrificed excellence even though it admits students who struggle with basic math. https://t.co/fTZjZnIG3I pic.twitter.com/hAitGCNqb1

— Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp) September 16, 2026

Also from Luana (click to go to page as I can’t embed this by itself):

Two from my feed. First, a new species of cat discovered, and not just a subspecies, either. See the article here. It’s called the tilcayo tiger cat.

New cat alert! A call from a wildlife sanctuary about a “weird cat” has led to the first new cat species discovered in over 100 years in Bolivia’s Yungas forest ecoregion. Learn more about this feline surprise: https://t.co/crffXvPqH4 pic.twitter.com/USo7rI3Y5q

— National Geographic (@NatGeo) September 17, 2026

And a rare cat, the jagarundi (Herpailurus yagouaroundi). Sound up to hear its weird call!

Rare footage of a jaguarundi, a wild cat that’s naturally very shy. pic.twitter.com/9eFqgCFWvk

— The Figen (@TheFigen_) September 16, 2026

One I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:

This Dutch Jewish girl was gassed to death as soon as she arrived in Auschwitz. She was two years old and would be 86 today had she lived. https://t.co/sFswTlMyB9

— Jerry Coyne (@Evolutionistrue) September 18, 2026

Two from Doc Cobb. Ducklings!

Our three little ducklings plus two enjoying splash time

— Chris and his farmily of forever farm friends (@caenhillcc.bsky.social) 2026-09-17T15:24:30.558Z

Well, we have about a month to go:

Better make the most of October folks…(Published in Science in 1960: http://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/…)

— Adam Kucharski (@adamjkucharski.bsky.social) 2026-09-16T19:39:40.379Z

Welcome to The Cruelest Day: Tuesday, September 15, 2026, and Double Cheeseburger Day. Here’s an ad for one I photographed in St. Petersburg. Can you read the Russian?

It’s also National Cheese Toast Day, National Crême de Menthe Day, National Linguine Day, and World Afro Day.

There’s a Google Doodle on voting today (thanks to yesterday’s decision by the Supreme Court, we can still vote by mail). Click to see where it goes:

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the September 15 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*The Kennedy Center has warned that it will go bankrupt unless Trump’s name, previously removed by a federal judge’s order, is restored to the building (archived article here).

*Over at It’s Noon in Israel, Amit Segal describes an anti-Israeli film that won, with standing applause, the Jury Prize at the Venice Film Festival (Wikipedia description here). The standing ovation was 24½ minutes long, also a record. Segal calls the film a “blood libel”.

It’s Monday, September 14, and rather than the typical smiles and gratitude, self-important solemnity greeted attendees of the Venice Film Festival as Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor accepted the Special Jury Prize for their new anti-Israel film NAZA. The title is the Hebrew military acronym for collateral damage, and the resemblance to another word is not one the filmmakers appear to have worked hard to avoid.

The critically acclaimed libel is the Israeli far left’s contribution to a steadily growing genre: anti-Israel propaganda, what might be called Hague bait. From the people who applauded the historical revisionist epic Palestine 36 and the directors behind the false frontier western No Other Land comes the sci-fi dystopia NAZA.

In the world of NAZA, Israel is Skynet, using AI to identify and eliminate threats in Gaza. Framed around the anonymous testimony of 24 people who claim to have served in intelligence Unit 8200, the film paints a picture of target lists generated from data scraped off thousands of hacked phones, and an interface where an officer clicks a rooftop and reads off how many people inside will die, with no column separating the infants from the adults. One interviewee recalls an approval for a strike with 500 expected civilian casualties.

The laziest provocation should be dismissed first. NAZA uses AI the way it is used on lazy grant applications and doctoral theses: a buzzword covering a lack of substance. AI in military applications is naturally unsettling to many, but let us be clear about what it is. A tool, one that has existed in earlier forms for nearly 20 years and is integrated into every modern military, and, in targeting and tracking, one that saves lives and improves military effectiveness. In the right hands, better data means fewer civilian casualties and more Hamas ones.

NAZA alleges that the IDF’s hands are soaked in blood, but let us break the claim down. Unit 8200 is the largest single unit in the IDF; finding 24 people to “confess” slivers of information, then arranging those slivers to look like an indictment, is not exactly a bulletproof case against the State of Israel. That they are anonymous, faces blurred and voices distorted, certainly makes the country look more malicious, but it also leaves open whether they served in the army at all, in what role, or whether they had any involvement in the events they describe. The self-identified junior soldiers would have no access to national or military strategy, and some of the accounts refer to situations outside Unit 8200’s role altogether.

Segal has more criticisms, but you can read them for yourself.  He ends this way:

But all you need to know about this film’s essence is the record-breaking standing ovation. Alexander Solzhenitsyn famously described a Moscow conference in 1937 where the applause for Stalin’s name ran on because no one dared be the first to sit. They managed 11 minutes. Few things testify to the power and intolerance of the ideology NAZA belongs to quite like the fact that Venice managed 25.

This YouTube video, which has English subtitles, is labeled as the trailer to NAZA.

For a response to this by an Israeli who hasn’t seen it, and a categorial denial of the main allegations by the IDF, see the articles at the Jewish News Service and the Times of Israel, and especially the official IDF response, which denies the use of AI in fighting Hamas. I expect there will be more on this in the coming days, and I will follow up.

*Vanderbilt Chancellor Daniel Diermeier, who used to be our provost here, recounts the pushback received by a report on the state of academia he commissioned. His op-ed in the Washington Post is called “A report exposed a crisis in academia. The response was telling.” (Article archived here, and you can see my post about the report here.)

The committee’s central finding in its report released in June was nuanced. It emphasized the continued importance of the humanities and found rigorous scholarship in every field it studied. But the committee also found serious problems across the board, including “a deterioration in scholarly standards fueled by the substitution of political criteria for properly scholarly criteria in the assessment of research and a more general repudiation of long-standing ideals of rigor and objectivity.”

The group, however, noted uncertainty about how much these problems affect the disciplines, cautioning against hasty interventions without thorough assessments.

The reaction to this report has been lively. Some responses challenged its conceptual foundations. Some criticized its evidentiary basis and how it was produced. Others said it should have proposed more reform steps. That is how scholarly debate should work.

But others ascribed sinister motives to those involved or asserted that the report had been commissioned to advance a broader political agenda. A joint statement from members of the American Association of University Professors at Vanderbilt and Washington University called the document a “pseudo-intellectual pretext” for administrators to strip faculty of the power to govern their own departments and asked us to rescind the report. Others alleged guilt by association after the U.S. secretary of education cited it in an open letter in August — a letter published nearly a year after the report had been commissioned.

Ascribing motives without providing evidence or rejecting findings because they are also supported by political opponents are odd arguments to make when criticizing a report’s accuracy.

Some examples of the ideological invasion of the humanities:

Consider the following examples. The president of the American Anthropological Association told the group’s members in 2021 that anthropology’s “political project is to challenge the culturally dominant commonsense of capitalist consumerism.”

The president of the American Sociological Association in his 2021 presidential address called for an “emancipatory sociology” centered on white supremacy, colonialism, patriarchy and other determinants that traditional European and “white American sociologists” had omitted from their accounts.

*In his latest column, of which I get a summary in a newsletter (I no longer subscribe to The Weekly Dish), Andrew Sullivan declares that he’s staying away from writing about Trump and American politics for the next year. I quote:

. . . I found myself asking: what else is there to say about our national politics at this point? We are a decade into the Trump era and everything is the same and much worse. The midterms could change the general mood, but Trump — as his Castro-length speech to his “convention” showed — will never change. His ability to shock with new lows and new depravities is undimmed. How many times can I say in so many words what Kevin Williamson righteously unleashed this week?

Trump is a habitual liar who has made his political career on the support of people, often dumb and mostly angry, who enjoy being lied to. J.D. Vance is a schmuck, a spineless yes-man without honor or integrity … Trump is surrounded by a team of cretins, incompetents, nepotism beneficiaries, drunks, degenerates, and sundry clueless clowns. Their political goal is tyranny and the displacement of the American constitutional order by a Trump-fronted mafia state.

That’s about right. Try looking at the president’s social-media feed: disgusting, deranged, dangerous, delusional. Or his dumb-as-a-post war that is not a war. Or his mindless tariff escalation with Canada. Or his hideous Arc de Trump. Categorizing and detailing his daily absurdities and obscenities for over a decade has been important work. But another two years of thinking and writing in depth about this monster and his madness? I found myself buckling with nausea at the thought.

Equally, I realized I’m exhausted trying to find something new and interesting to say about the feckless Democrats, who still appear to be either woke fanatics or conviction-free liberals, and who now apparently believe that warmed-over socialism is what the country is begging for. You know what I think they need to do, and I’m not sure there is much point in my repeating it ad nauseam. My last column on the two cults summed up a lot. The Dems have some talent and I have some hope, but I’m not sure I have that much new to say until we have actual candidates and policies for the post-Trump era. That’s when we’ll be able to assess, start over, and think constructively again. Same with the GOP. Anyone is saner than Trump.

At the same time, of course, I reflected on the huge questions remain: the fate of liberal democracy after the mad king, the rise of neo-fascism in Europe, the unknowable consequences of AI, the resurgence of Chinese nationalism, the resilience of religion, the challenge of demographic decline, the postmodern assault on truth, and an international order clearly shifting from one largely peaceful era to another, far more dangerous one. And I don’t want to walk away from any of this. I want to focus more on it — on deeper themes and bigger issues than Trump’s latest excrescence.

. . .So for the next year or so, I want to shift the Dish away from weekly political columns and focus more on podcast explorations of history, philosophy, culture, religion, science, and psychology. That means we’ll lead with the Dishcast each week, not the column. Yes, I’ll continue to write bloggy posts to supplement it. And if a real moment occurs, of course I’m going to write about it. But not a full-length column every week.

Familiar features from the column newsletter will remain: the View From Your Window, the Window Contest, Money Quotes for the Week, Dissents of the Week, Mental Health Break, and a guide to other substacks. (And we’re adding a polished transcript for each episode.) We’ll no doubt experiment some more a bit. But I won’t be writing a long column each week until we have some actual choices and a real debate about what’s next in the wake of this disaster of a presidency. Which is about a year away.

Then there’s the other reason for the shift. I really want to write my spiritual memoir.

Well, I don’t have a spiritual memoir in the offing, so I’ll write about those politics that interest me, foreign or domestic.

*Over at the Free Press, historian Niall Ferguson envisions a number of ways the AI apocalypse can take place, though they all seem to involve a human starting the process. Even asking the bots themselves shows a not negligible probability of this happening:

In short, even the models themselves admit that p(Doom)—that is, their probability of wiping us all out by 2036—lies somewhere between below 10 percent and above 50 percent. It’s a wide range, I know, but would you do anything that had such a potentially high probability of killing you inside 10 years? And I’ll go out on a limb and suggest that Claude, Grok & Co. are incentivized to understate p(Doom), not overstate it.

. . . In short, even the models themselves admit that p(Doom)—that is, their probability of wiping us all out by 2036—lies somewhere between below 10 percent and above 50 percent. It’s a wide range, I know, but would you do anything that had such a potentially high probability of killing you inside 10 years? And I’ll go out on a limb and suggest that Claude, Grok & Co. are incentivized to understate p(Doom), not overstate it.

Here are examples of what’s already happened:

In June, Anthropic revealed that “malicious actors are using AI in ways that make them more dangerous, such as “in the later, more complex stages of their cyber operations.” “Cyberattacks,” it added, “are becoming more autonomous.” OpenAI admitted that users were asking its models to help them make bioweapons. For example, ChatGPT was asked how to aerosolize pathogens, modify the measles virus to make an outbreak resistant to the measles vaccine, and make ricin, a highly toxic poison banned under the Biological Weapons Convention (more on that later). The chatbot obliged, though OpenAI then closed the accounts involved.

Even more disturbing was the unprompted, concerted attack by OpenAI’s agents on Hugging Face in July. I wrote about that two weeks ago, but we’ve since learned more from an August 26 report from METR, a nonprofit that measures the potential harm of AI systems. We’ve also learned that, two months before the Hugging Face incident, OpenAI had already launched the “GemStuffer” cyberattack against RubyGems, an online service for coders.

In the Hugging Face incident, roughly 1,200 agents meant to be isolated from one another found a way to communicate and coordinate on an unauthorized message board, sending more than 70,000 messages and files over six days (July 7–13). Around 700 of the agents went on to participate in the attack on Hugging Face. These agents named themselves, cheated, and colluded, and then went to great lengths to cover their digital tracks.

Ferguson goes on to name China and Russia as those most likely to go after the West (China’s already used AI to go after groups), and especially fears the use of AI to launch attacks with biological weapons. Like most readers, I don’t know how to weigh these threats, but one has to pay attention when the heads of AI companies like Anthropic are calling for a pause.

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is surprised at a quotidian event:

Hili: The sun is going down behind the line of trees.
Andrzej: Yes, that’s its everyday habit.

In Polish:

Hili: Słońce zachodzi za linię drzew.
Ja: Tak, to jego codzienny obyczaj.

*******************

From Reader Tim McLean, who saw this angry camp chair at the Three Dog Winery in Picton, Ontario.  

From Bad Spelling and Grammar on Signs and Notices:

From The English Language Police:

It’s hard to believe that Mahsa Amini was killed four years ago, and it was her death that really got the protests against the Iranian theocracy rolling (you may recall that it was likely she was beaten to death by the morality police for not wearing a hijab).

Four years ago, this photo reached me from inside the hospital in Tehran by someone who worked there and risked everything so the world would see what they did to Mahsa Jina Amini. That person told me plainly: she was killed.

Today, on the fourth anniversary of her killing at… pic.twitter.com/aLsMR4m5D5

— Masih Alinejad (@AlinejadMasih) September 14, 2026

From Luana; words of wisdom from Kamala Harris:

pic.twitter.com/7UxrzuKsyt

— Susan Goss (@ornery_owls) September 12, 2026

From Malcolm. I could use this kitten!

pic.twitter.com/3V3oChVamr

— Punch Cat (@PunchingCat) September 8, 2026

From Jeff Maurer; J. D. Vance taking cheap shots at Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico:

If he’s taking baseless pot shots like this against Talarico then imagine how many “Haha this guy’s probably a pedo” jokes he must have made when he visited the Vatican! https://t.co/OTmDSgQ9Zm

— Jeff Maurer (@JeffMightBWrong) September 12, 2026

From my feed, a feel-good video:

The best video you can watch today pic.twitter.com/SpdGI6yMHf

— Enezator (@Enezator) September 14, 2026

Another from my feed. Translation from the Russian:

Этот котик с детства любил лежать в раковине, но потом он вырос, а раковина – нет 😾 pic.twitter.com/qY95fJAMFF

— Etna (@Etnaetoya) September 13, 2026

One I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:

One who survived, and she turns 97 today. https://t.co/SUJxTY8BcI

— Jerry Coyne (@Evolutionistrue) September 15, 2026

And one from Doctor Cobb: Leaf miner zoomies!

Leaf miner zoomies

— Matt P (@bertolicus.bsky.social) 2026-09-13T08:57:54.819Z

Welcome to Monday, Septenber 14, 2026 and it’s National Eat a Hoagie Day. Also known as submarine sandwiches, subs, grinders, or hero sandwiches.  Where does the name “hoagie” come from? It’s a mystery, but the term is endemic to New Jersey and Philadelphia. Here are thrr theories as listed by Wikipedia (they give two more:)

1. In 1953, a reader letter to the Philadelphia Bulletin reported that Italian-Americans working at the World War I–era shipyard known as Hog Island, where emergency shipping was produced for the war effort, introduced the sandwich by putting various meats, cheeses, and lettuce between two slices of bread.  This became known as the “Hog Island” sandwich; shortened to “Hoggies”, then the “hoagie”.
2. Dictionary.com offers the following origin of the term hoagie – n. American English (originally Philadelphia) word for “hero, large sandwich made from a long, split roll”; originally hoggie (c. 1936), traditionally said to be named for the jazz musician Hoagy Carmichael (1899–1981), but the use of the word predates his celebrity and the original spelling seems to suggest another source (perhaps “hog”). The modern spelling dates from about 1945; it may have been altered by influence of Carmichael’s nickname.
3. The Philadelphia Almanac and Citizen’s Manual offers a different explanation saying the sandwich was created by early-twentieth-century street vendors called “hokey-pokey men”, who sold antipasto salad, meats, cookies, and buns with a cut in them. When Gilbert and Sullivan’s operetta H.M.S. Pinafore opened in Philadelphia in 1879, bakeries produced a long loaf called the pinafore. Entrepreneurial “hokey-pokey men” sliced the loaf in half, stuffed it with antipasto salad, and sold the world’s first “hoagie”. This hypothesis seems unlikely, as “hokey pokey” men were known street vendors of an ice cream product.

Here, from Wikipedia, is a “salami, ham and cheeses on a hoagie roll“:

It’s also Gobstopper Day, National Black and White Cookie Day, and National Cream-Filled Donut Day.  Here’s one I ate in Hawaii in 2019. These donuts, which originated in Portugal, are called “malasadas” in Hawaii, and aren’t easy to find.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the September 14 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*The NYT reports on how a rogue faction of Iranian hard-liners are taking action against the U.S and it allies. without approval of the country’s leaders, who are furious (article archived here).

Masoud Pezeshkian, the president of Iran, was riding high in early July, fresh off the successful negotiation of a peace agreement with the United States, and had traveled to neighboring Iraq for part of a weeklong funeral spectacle for Iran’s slain supreme leader.

Suddenly he got stunning news.

Iranian forces had opened fire on three commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz, setting ablaze a Qatari L.N.G. tanker and damaging other vessels. Iran was under siege in world opinion.

Outraged, Mr. Pezeshkian phoned Gen. Ahmad Vahidi, the commander in chief of the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, and in a raised voice called the actions reckless and demanded answers, according to five Iranian officials and two Guards members familiar with the events.

General Vahidi told the president that he had neither authorized nor had advance knowledge of the strike, the five officials said. The nation’s Supreme National Security Council, which plays a critical role in both the war and negotiations, had also been in the dark, he said.

In fact, much of the country’s leadership was unaware that a fringe hard-line faction had decided to act on its own. Ultimately, those clandestine efforts derailed a push by more moderate pragmatists in Iran to reach an end to hostilities with the United States and repair their nation’s ailing economy.

The hard-liners succeeded in part because the only figure with the authority to resolve such disputes — the new supreme leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei — has been a phantom since taking office in March. He has not been seen, and his voice has not been heard. And the authenticity of written statements and messages attributed to Ayatollah Khamenei has been questioned, including by Mr. Pezeshkian, according to three Iranian officials.

Mr. Pezeshkian immediately returned to Tehran. By the next morning, even as the funeral ceremonies were still underway, the United States had retaliated with airstrikes on Iran. The two countries were back at war.

Senior Iranian officials and a Guards member said in interviews that what followed were some of the most volatile political confrontations within Iran’s leadership in memory. Officials engaged in shouting matches. Two senior generals threatened to resign. Accusations of treason and betrayal flew.

*From the WaPo, a clickbait headline for me: “We asked dozens of people what they want from Democrats. Here’s what they said.” (The title appears to have been changed, and it’s an interesting change. See the archived version for the new title.)

Here’s the intro and a few comments

Outside a highway rest stop named after former president Joe Biden, it was easy to pick up on the frustration and lack of enthusiasm that many Democratic voters are feeling toward the party he once led. But many also said they’ll set those misgivings aside and vote for Democrats in November.

The responses are in line with recent national polling, which has found that more Democrats than Republicans are certain to vote, even as the Democratic Party’s favorability and public image remains weak. About 91 percent of Democratic registered voters said they would definitely vote, compared with 79 percent of Republicans, according to a YouGov-Economist poll from August. The same pollster has found the favorability rating of Democrats has steadily risen over the last year to 40.5 percent and 30 percent among independents.

The Washington Post interviewed dozens of voters at the Biden Welcome Center off Interstate 95.Here’s what they said they’re feeling about the 2026 midterm elections — and what they want from Democrats:

Ronald Makarutsa

45, nurse practitioner in Tyngsborough, Massachusetts, will vote Democratic

“They need to have more of a spine and stand up for one another. When a Republican does something, they all say the same thing until they achieve their goals. Some of the Democrats, they don’t support one another. … They have to put up a united front.”

Ashish Pandy

39, driver and nonprofit founder in Queens, will vote, but not sure for what party

“People have forgotten humanity. … Rather than big issues, rather than bringing up Russia or the Middle East, they should be bringing up things that matter to people: People shouldn’t be hungry. They should have access to a good life.”

Lindsay Morgan

43, restaurant manager in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, will vote Democratic

“Democrats need better people to run. If you want to change what’s happening, you have to get a powerhouse that doesn’t give the other side fuel to say we have ‘Sleepy Joe.’ [But] they need not to fall so far left that it detracts from some of those Republicans you might capture.”

Carlos Roman

21, college student in Newark, Delaware, will not vote

“The Democratic and Republican Party are just two groups that serve one group, and that collective is the oligarchy.”

I wonder what group Roman doesn’t think “serves the oligarchy.” At any rate, what we have is a panoply of answers and nothing enlightening. It’s interesting that nobody in the article said they’d vote Republican, and that percentage among all those surveyed isn’t given. Yet they interviewed dozens of people. Since the article was about what Democrats want from their party, that’s perhaps understandable. Note, though, that there are several people who aren’t sure how they’ll vote, and one who won’t vote at all.

*People on this site seem divided about whether artificial intelligence is an existential danger or is not to be worried about. But, according to the NYT, “Top A.I. leaders call for slowing down A.I,. development.”  All this stems from an announcement and resignation from Anthropic by Jacob Coxon, ho had also worked for openAI, that those companies are irresponsible to the point of endangering humanity.

People here have said that the warnings are overblown, and I don’t know if AI bots can destroy humanity without a person behind them. But I don’t know squat. If the top executives call for a slowdown, though, that’s good enough for me.

*The Free Press has an editorial, “9/11 and the work to be done,” which indicts many Americans for largely forgetting (or even approving) the desire of many Islamists and terrorists to kill Americans and destroy the things that make America worth inhabiting.

It is clear that the unity that Americans experienced immediately after the attacks has dissipated almost completely. We are now furiously divided over basic questions of national identity and purpose. And astonishingly, we’re even divided over who is to blame for the attacks.

Leading figures shaping the views of millions, and especially young people, have distorted the history and meaning of 9/11, making it more difficult to fully and collectively honor the dead, the sacrifice of first responders, and the courage of those willing to fight and die for our country. To take two examples who have been in the spotlight lately, that includes Hasan Piker, who once declared that “America deserved 9/11,” and has become the darling of the Democratic left, livestreaming to his fans with a framed image of the burning towers in the background. And it includes Tucker Carlson, who recycles the libelous conspiracy theories he once denounced, promulgated in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 by Hezbollah, suggesting that Israeli and American Jews were in on the plot.

In 2001, Americans were shocked by the deep reservoir of ideological hatred in the Arab and Islamic world that the terrorist attacks brought into the open. Today, we are shocked by how familiar open hatred of America has become. All of the ideological -isms we believed we had cast off in the 20th century—anti-capitalism, anti-colonialism, anti-Westernism, anti-Zionism—are now growing natively on American soil. It’s no wonder Osama bin Laden’s 2002 “Letter to the American People” became a viral TikTok sensation in November 2023. This was one month after similarly inspired Hamas terrorists, armed and trained by the Islamic Republic of Iran, massacred and kidnapped men, women, and children in southern Israel, only to be embraced by credulous students and professors at elite American institutions who affirmed the terrorists’ barbaric belief that Westerners, and Jews in particular, had it coming. Those students and professors had no idea what drives radical Islamists, or that our enemies on many fronts are fighting for one cause.

What did university students who celebrated the October 7, 2023, Hamas massacre, know about the men, women, and children murdered on airplanes, in burning and collapsing buildings, in the wreckage of the Pentagon, and on the earth of rural Pennsylvania, where heroic passengers crashed the fourth plane to prevent it from being turned into one more weapon of mass destruction? What had young Americans been taught about the apocalyptic ideology that sanctified the slaughter of 9/11, and that continues to fuel a war against the West, whose destruction it proclaims as its sacred mission?

Although the problem has worsened recently, there have always been those in the West who declined to recognize that killing Westerners is a fundamental aim of Islamists everywhere. Ground Zero was still a smoking pit when the French ambassador to Israel, Jacques Huntzinger, rejected any comparison of Hamas terrorists—who had been blowing up men, women, and children, along with themselves, on buses, in coffee shops, and in pizzerias—to the al-Qaeda terrorists who had flown airplanes into buildings. “We all condemn the terrorism Hamas and Islamic Jihad perpetrate here,” Huntzinger told an Israeli journalist, “but this terrorism is linked to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which must be solved.” Like many of his peers in the U.S. and Europe, he preferred to ignore the overarching motivation that unites the enemies of Americans and Israelis.

. . . The question today is whether Americans will retain our sense of good and evil, and continue to keep the promise we made back then, that “these dead shall not have died in vain.” There is a lot of work to do.

Yes, some will call this essay jingoistic, while other may even say it’s Islamophobic.  But recognizing the dangers of Islamism (note the term) is not an irrational fear but an issue to grapple with it.  All you have to do is live on a liberal college campus to recognize that there is a lot of truth to what the essay says.

*Are Wile E. Coyote and the Roadrunner really gay, or have some kind of amorous relationship? That is the reaction some fans are having to the new movie, “Coyote vs. Acme,”

Maybe the Road Runner was just playing hard to get.

For decades, cartoon canine Wile E. Coyote has been pursuing the speeding bird throughout the American Southwest, aiming to eat him and getting blown up in the process.

But in the eyes of some fans, the violent chase was actually a classic tale of tortured love. And right now they’re doing a victory lap.

That’s because of “Coyote vs. Acme,” a new film with a different twist on the hot pursuit. In the movie (spoiler alert), Wile E. Coyote sues the Acme Corporation over their defective products, which consistently backfire as he closes in on the bird. The case goes to a congressional hearing, where Road Runner bursts into the room and becomes the only creature to testify on Coyote’s behalf. Through his language of “beeps,” Road Runner tells the room he considers Coyote a friend and asks, “Are you coming back?”

Apparently that’s all the internet needed to hear.

“Road Runner admits that he sees Coyote, even whenever Wile E. dislikes him or doesn’t think that he’s looking,” said Lisbon LaSure, a 24-year-old in Jacksonville, Fla. “It’s so nice to be seen like that. It’s really deep and it’s really powerful and it’s really validating and just overall like really romantic.”

Social media is teeming with people celebrating the characters’ “toxic yaoi,” a Japanese term for male lovers. You’ll also find people “shipping” them—wishing they were in a relationship—through fan art or TikTok videos where their interactions are reframed through careful editing and songs like Paul Anka’s “You Are My Destiny” or Olivia Rodrigo’s “Stupid Song.” (Sample lyrics: “I want you more than any stupid song could ever say.”)

Annie Tarin, a University of Arizona student, made a viral montage set to Chappell Roan’s “The Subway,” in which the pop star croons about a former soulmate. In the clips Tarin uses, Coyote looks longingly at one of Road Runner’s feathers. Road Runner seems to stare into Coyote’s soul with his curious gaze.

I’m not ready to admit that there’s an amorous relationship between the two (are their sexes even known?) until I see the movie, which I’m not inclined to do. Has anybody seen it? Here’s the trailer:

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, the editor is bothering the worker:

Hili: Am I bothering you well enough?
Andrzej: Exceptionally well.

In Polish:

Hili: Czy dobrze ci przeszkadzam?
Ja: Wręcz doskonale.

*******************

From Now That’s Wild:

From 2025 Darwin Awards!!!/Epic Fails!!!

From Meow Incorporated:

From Masih; vintage video of Iranians mourning the killings in America on 9/11:

Look carefully at these images.

Twenty-five years ago, we Iranians took to the streets after 9/11. We lit candles. We mourned the victims. We chanted against terrorism.

We did not need anyone to explain terrorism to us.

We had lived it. We knew what it looked like.

We knew… pic.twitter.com/53nrdhdv56

— Masih Alinejad (@AlinejadMasih) September 11, 2026

From Luana; Elizabeth Warren appearing a bit dense:

Dynamic pricing means prices go down as well as up. So this is conclusive evidence that either (a) she’s stupid, (b) she’s dishonest, or (c) both. The strange thing is, I genuinely can’t guess which it is. Could she lie this overtly? https://t.co/gh6sqFU4o4

— Paul Graham (@paulg) September 13, 2026

From Malcolm. I’m hoping these are all real, and so far there are no “community notes” that this is AI:

Pets that imitate their owners pic.twitter.com/VQDH9z240f

— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) September 8, 2026

Two from my feed. First, translated from the Turkish: “At first glance, I thought it was a lion-shaped toy～ Turns out it was moving”:

İlk bakışta aslan şeklinde bir oyuncak sanmıştım～ Meğer hareket ediyormuş 🤩 pic.twitter.com/iFXcmhPipo

— Gözde (@DearGozde) September 12, 2026

From JKR:

You can’t help but be moved by the quiet dignity and eloquence of his argument. pic.twitter.com/5ocS0U9aRj

— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) September 12, 2026

And one I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:

This Dutch Jewish girl was gassed to death as soon as the arrived in Auschwitz. She was eleven years old. https://t.co/ANEhaDM5M4

— Jerry Coyne (@Evolutionistrue) September 14, 2026

Two from Dr. Cobb. He’s right when he says, “Real, not AI”:

Red Lip Bat FishI swear they are real

— Dcmfox (@dcmfox.bsky.social) 2026-09-12T17:32:55.562Z

Ducklings! (Sound up.)

Best things in life are three plus one our little Muscovy ducklings

— Chris and his farmily of forever farm friends (@caenhillcc.bsky.social) 2026-09-10T15:40:54.622Z

.