Sunday: Hili dialogue

May 10, 2026 • 6:45 am

Welcome to Sunday, May 10, 2026, the Sabbath for gentile cats and Mother’s Day.  I have only one photo of my mom, and I’ve already shown it, but below is her obituary from The Washington Post:  I’m not sure who wrote it, but I don’t remember the “tireless letter writer” and “Girl Scout leader” bits.  And I don’t like the bit about Heaven at the end; I’m not even sure she believe in it.

Note her friendship with Edward P. Jones, who lived across the hall from her and dad (and me, for a few years) when we occupied an apartment in Arlington. Jones was a tax attorney and aspiring writer then, and mom used to bring him food all the time, as he couldn’t cook.  He later wrote several works of fiction, with one of them—The Known World—winning the Pulitzer Prize.  As another Washington Post article said:

He makes his home near Washington National Cathedral in an apartment so disheveled that he allows only close friends inside. There is no bed (he sleeps on a pallet), no bookshelves, no couch, nor much to sit on other than a kitchen chair. He does not have a car, a driver’s license or any mechanized means of transport, not even a bicycle. He has no cellphone, no DVD player, and his Internet connection is sporadic. Though he loves movies and trash daytime television — in particular, those judge shows — he has only a 10-year-old, 13-inch TV and has never had cable. He has never been to a sporting event. He has no deep romantic attachments. He says his closest friend has been Lil Coyne, an elderly woman who for 20 years lived down the hall from him in an apartment building in Alexandria. She died this summer at age 90.

Yes, Jones is a reclusive and odd duck but was great writer (The Known World is superb), though for some reason he decided to stop writing. He still has no bed and hardly any furniture. And the apartments were in Arlington, Virginia,  not Alexandria.  But he still takes my sister and brother-in-law to a fancy dinner once a year—in honor of our mother and his.

Is it ghoulish to show an obituary on Mother’s Day? I hope not.

:

It’s also National Liver and Onions Day, a dish that my dad loved but we hated (and it made the house stink), and National Shrimp Day.

There’s a new Google Doodle today celebrating Mother’s Day. Click to see where it goes:

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this day by consulting the May 10 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

Tip: I don’t often read Mo Dowd at the NYT, but her latest column on Ted Turner, called “My Ted talk“, is quite good (the link goes to an archived version).

*After reading in many places that the Democrats were set to dominate Congress in the midterms, and maybe even overturn the House, the news is now telling us that all the unwarranted party-based redistricting, done by both parties, is favoring the Republicans. Oy! Does the news simply need something to run with? From the NYT:

Just two weeks ago, Democrats felt increasingly emboldened about taking control of the House in November after seeming to fight the redistricting wars to a draw.

But two court rulings — one by the Supreme Court and another by Virginia’s top court — and an aggressive new push by red states to carve up congressional maps have delivered the Republican Party its biggest burst of momentum in many months.

Put bluntly, Republicans have roughly 10 more House seats that favor them than they did just 10 days ago, and Democrats are suddenly grappling with a new landscape.

“This is now clearly closer than it was just a week and a half ago,” Representative Brendan Boyle, a Pennsylvania Democrat, said of his party’s chances to retake the House.

Democrats are still widely seen as favored to win the House this fall. Republicans face a daunting political climate, saddled with President Trump’s sagging approval ratings, high gas prices and an unpopular war with Iran. In special elections and last year’s races for governor, Democratic enthusiasm has swamped Republican turnout.

“I was anticipating about a 15-to-20-seat pickup before the last week and a half,” Mr. Boyle said. “Now I would be anticipating a 10-to-15-seat pickup.”

That would be more than enough to wrest the majority from Republicans, who are clinging to a current edge of 217 to 212 seats. And history is not on Republicans’ side: The party in power almost always loses seats in midterm elections.

So the headline, saying that Democrats’ confidence is shaken, is misguided.  As long as the Democrats have a five-seat majority, the House is good to go. But remember that Trump still has veto power over Congressional bills, so we may be in for a few years of stalemate.  And this subheadline in the story is also misleading:

LOL!

*I was surprised to see a strong editorial-board op-ed criticizing AOC in the Washington Post, a paper she’d recently criticized. It was about, of all things, Airbnbs. First, a recent tweet in which AOC says that the American Revolution was actually an economic revolt against the “billionaires of their time.”

History goes down the memory hole. Now, the kerfuffle:

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) is on a tear, spinning yarns about the American Revolution being an uprising against the rich while complaining that The Post is standing in the way of her humble ambition to remake the country as a socialist utopia. We prefer to simply debate policy.

Consider AOC’s recent criticism of Airbnb. The legislator received blowback after telling a millionaire friend that all billionaires come by their wealth illegitimately. She then pointed to the short-term home rental platform as an example of how a service that millions of people like to use is actually harmful to society.

Ocasio-Cortez argued that Airbnb’s business couldn’t exist without destabilizing housing markets and rapaciously evicting millions: “Now young people are planning for a future where they will never be able to afford to own a home while others have 20 and live off renting it out to them at extortionate rates with zero protections.” A few make billions while millions of Americans bear the cost, she insisted.

Airbnb has achieved impressive scale, but it’s nothing compared to the government. Fewer than 2 percent of American homes are listed on the platform. While there is some evidence it affects home prices in extremely high-tourism areas, it can’t come close to explaining the national rise in home prices.

The housing crisis visible around the country is a result of government simultaneously constricting supply while stoking demand.

. . . Airbnb is a particularly strange example for the congresswoman. Her city effectively banned the platform in 2023 in response to a lobbying campaign by hotels. Has housing become abundant and affordable in Gotham? Of course not, but taking thousands of units off the market has made it a lot harder to find a reasonably priced hotel. Room rates have risen 12.6 percent since the law took effect, compared to 3.6 percent nationwide.

The socialist argument is also baffling to people who benefit from using the platform. In the first three months of this year, guests spent nearly $30 billion on Airbnb, but the company’s net income was only $160 million, according to earnings released Thursday. Not exactly rapacious.

. . . If Ocasio-Cortez runs for president, her campaign increasingly looks like it will be based not on inspiration and unity but demagoguery and division. The race for the Democratic nomination remains wide open, and there will be a lane for exactly the opposite of what the congresswoman has offered so far.

Dear god, I’m still enough of a Democrat to urge my comrades to keep AOC out of the running. If she runs for President, the Democrats will lose. She has neurons, but they don’t work well, and she’s eager and willing to distort facts if they don’t support the “progressive” agenda. I love the Post’s characterization of AOC’s “socialist utopia.”

*The British Medical Association used to be opposed to The Cass Review of 2020, which harshly criticized the treatment of gender dysphoria in the UK by the National Health Service.  Before Cass, the NHS was largely dispensing “affirmative care,” giving puberty blockers to adolescents and putting them on a treadmill to medical transition.  As a result, the UK has banned puberty blockers to people under 18, save for clinical trials, and has moved all gender care to only two clinics.  Now the BMA has dropped its opposition to Cass. Still, although the BMA doesn’t oppose the report, it still wants doctors to have autonomy to prescribe puberty blockers to anyone they think warrants them:

The British Medical Association has said it no longer opposes the Cass review into gender medicine, but that doctors should still have the “autonomy” to prescribe puberty blockers.

In July 2024, the BMA’s council voted to “oppose the implementation” of the review, which called for an overhaul of NHS gender services and a move away from a “medical pathway” that had led to thousands of children being put on powerful sex hormone drugs.

The BMA said at the time that the recommendations by Dr Hilary Cass, now Baroness Cass, were “unsubstantiated”. The union criticised her methodology and called for restrictions on giving children puberty blocker drugs to be paused until it had conducted its own review.

On Wednesday, the BMA published this long-awaited critique of Cass’s work, written by a “task and finish group” of 12 union members.

Professor David Strain, the chair of the BMA’s board of science and the report’s lead author, told The Times that “the baroness has been vindicated in the way she approached the data”.

He praised her methodological approach, and when asked to name a single one of Cass’s 32 recommendations which the BMA opposed he said: “I can’t.”

BUT (there’s always a but):

. . .The BMA said that while it was not “disagreeing with Cass” it did have an issue with the way the review had been implemented, including how slow the NHS had been to set up new “holistic” services.

The union also criticised the decision of Wes Streeting, the health secretary, to pass legislation in 2024 banning the use of puberty blockers. Strain said the legislation was an “overreach” and NHS doctors should still be allowed to prescribe puberty blockers.

The BMA said it was “continuing to oppose a ban on puberty blockers for several reasons, not least because it is a threat to the autonomy of a doctor. We spend decades training on how to use drugs, and to have a political decision affecting the way we prescribe is wrong.”

The BMA is wrong. Puberty blockers have not been tested for long enough to be prescribed willy-nilly and, critically, people under 18 may not have the maturity or the understanding to get on the gender-affirming treadmill, which for many leads to surgery and a “sex life” without the possibility of orgasms.  The BMA wants to hold onto a bit of superstition even while it admits that Cass was, by and large, right.

*A man was arrested for hurling a big rock at a locally beloved  monk seal in Hawaii. (This is the Hawaiian monk seal, Neomonachus schauinslandi, vulnerable and reliant on conservation to survive. It’s one of only two mammals endemic to Hawaii, though it’s found on other mid-Pacific islands.). Some idiot chucked a big rock at the pinniped, but fortunately it missed narrowly, for it could have done serious damage had it hit the seal in the head. From People (with a video below):

An investigation is underway in Maui, Hawaii, after a man was caught on video throwing a rock at an endangered monk seal.

HawaiiNewsNow reported that the incident took place on the morning of Tuesday, May 5, on Front Street in Lahaina, Maui. Video footage captured by a bystander shows a man picking up a large rock and throwing it toward a seal swimming near the shore.

“What are you doing?” the person filming yelled out in the clip.

As another Hawaiian news outlet reports, “[the] monk seal, known as Lani, has a federal tracker and has been known by the community for about seven years.”

Back to People:

Speaking with the outlet, Maui resident Kaylee Schnitzer, 18, shared that she and another bystander witnessed the man — identified by the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) only as a 37-year-old adult male from Seattle, Wash. — throwing “a rock the size of a coconut.”

“He threw it, directly aiming towards the monk seal’s head,” she said, sharing that the seal then swam toward some nearby rocks.

Schnitzer also told KHON2 that, once they confronted the man, he allegedly said, “I don’t care, I’m rich.”

“I turned around, and I was like, ‘You can’t do that,'” she recounted to the outlet. “That’s when he told me, ‘… I’m rich. Fine me with whatever you want. I can pay for it.”

The Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) confirmed on Wednesday, May 6, that the Division of Conservation and Resources Enforcement (DOCARE) and the Maui Police Department were alerted to the incident and had opened an investigation.

“When the [DOCARE] officer arrived at the scene, the officer contacted a 37-year-old adult male from Seattle, Washington, who matched the description of the suspect,” the agency said. “The male was detained, identified, and advised of his legal rights. The male declined to make a statement and invoked his legal rights by requesting counsel of an attorney.”‘

Can you believe that? “I’m rich so I can afford to hurt seals”!!!  This is a federal crime and the feds are investigating it; see the report at the Department of Land and Natural Resources describing the crime:

In accordance with the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), which provides protections for Hawaiian monk seals, DOCARE will be turning over the state investigation of this incident to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of Law Enforcement (NOAA-OLE) for further review and action.

To see the wanton act, view the KOMO news video below.  What kind of person would do something like this? Yes, an aggressive and vicious moron. I hope they throw the book at him! He’s not Stay tuned, as I’m following this one:

*The Movie “Saturday, October 7” comprises interviews with survivors of the the slaughter of Israelis in 2013, is getting totally bimodal ratings at the Internet Movie Data Base, as I saw on a Facebook post, People are rating the movie either with either a “10” or a “1”, with almost no scores in between. You’d think the average score would be a bit 5 stars instead of the 3.3 given, but the IMDB weights the scores in some way they won’t disclose:

When unusual voting activity is detected, an alternate weighting calculation may be applied in order to preserve the reliability of our system.   To ensure that our rating mechanism remains effective, we do not disclose the exact method used to generate the rating.

Here’s the breakdown:

You’d think that the “1”s are those who didn’t like the movie, but all the written comments on the site are positive. As the FB post says, this almost certainly reflects those who have seen the film (the 10s) and those who haven’t but want to destroy the ratings because the movie’s about attack on Jews.  Here are a couple of the written summaries (again, there are no written negative ones, just scores of “1”):

Important documentary: This is a must-watch documentary with real stories of people who overcame a life-threatening situation. It is a testament of human strength and the capacity for survival, not only in the terrifying hours but in restoring their lives afterward. It gives you a clear geographical and historical perspective of the situation with a human perspective.

Undeniable facts—a must-see film. The courage of these survivors teaches us all so much. Each person’s story supports that hate is evil and it doesn’t matter what your age or background. It teaches us of the human spirit– to overcome the most brutal circumstances one could not even imagine. As humans, we have an obligation to witness and learn from what these brave souls survived.

Must watch. This is a must see. The tragic harrowing tale of seven survivors of unspeakable, unimaginable horror. It is a tale of tragedy and resilience in the face of such horror. In this world on endless propaganda and demonization, this movie speaks truth to power. The world can learn a thing or two. It is a MUST WATCH.

I tell you, the Jews can’t catch a break. Even a movie showing the October 7 slaughter is assaulted by haters who haven’t even seen it.

Here’s a 3-minute trailer:

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is nervous:

Hili: Come to bed already, it’s late.
Andrzej: I just need to check what the tyrants are planning again.

In Polish:

Hili: Chodź już spać, jest noc.
Ja: Jeszcze tylko muszę sprawdzić, co znów knują tyrani.

*******************

From  The Language Nerds:

From Things With Faces, a sad parfait:

From Cats that Have had Enough of Your Shit:

From Masih. I’ve shown something similar to this before, but we need to remember what the Iranian regime is doing to its people:

From Luana; a rare Democrat who is fighting for women-only spaces, like sports and prisons.

From Keith, a visionary:

One from my feed. An amazing dance (sound up):

One I reposted from The Auschwitz Memorial:

This is the birthday of a Polish Jew who went to France to work, and then was sent to Auschwitz at 32. As usual, the record says, "He did not survive."

Jerry Coyne (@evolutionistrue.bsky.social) 2026-05-10T09:15:37.159Z

And two from Dr. Cobb. First, Simon’s Cat wishes David Attenborough a happy 100th birthday:

Sir David Attenborough turns 100 today 🎉💯 A champion for planet earth, guiding us through jungles, oceans and other wonders of our planet. 🌍 #HappyBirthdayDavidAttenborough

Simon's Cat (@simonscatofficial.bsky.social) 2026-05-08T13:02:42.452Z

And I didn’t know there were insects that played dead. Here’s one, and the Wikipedia page says this:

When threatened, the beetles are able to feign death. A. verrucosus may reflex bleed during their death-feigning ritual. Releasing hemolymph which acts as an adhesive, partially covering the larvae in sand and debris, helping evade desert-dwelling predators. The species is becoming increasingly popular in the pet trade, due to their ease of care, hardiness, and longevity.

27 thoughts on “Sunday: Hili dialogue

  1. Lillian is such a lovely name there must be some interesting stories behind the nicknames. My father was from Brownsville Pa and he and my mother lived there for a while after marriage. Similar age as your mother, they may have known each other.

    1. I had two great aunts, one of whom was named Lillian and the other of whom was named Vivian. I think those two names are beautiful and should never go out of fashion.

      It’s neat that Lilian Coyne was good friends with a Pulitzer Prize winner. I’ve reserved The Known World at the library. And my mother is buried in Arlington National Cemetery too.

  2. I can’t think of any other arthropods that play dead, but yes, lots of insects keel over like they are dead when even slightly alarmed.

    1. I’ve never understood the logic of playing dead. You’d think predators would just go, “Yum! Fresh meat!”

      1. When an animal is attacking because it feels threatened, playing dead means the threat is neutralized so the attack can be stopped. If the attack is about eating the victim then you’re right, it means the eating can commence.

  3. It appears Seattle man is a Ukrainian immigrant. He and his wife run a trucking/logistics company in Washington state. What a jerk.

    I enjoyed seeing your mom’s obit, and it is not at all morbid to remember her today. I’m curious about her nicknames, and how to pronounce them.

    Thanks for the memory of liver and onions in the cast-iron skillet. As I would’ve said at the time, P.U.

    Wishing all a happy Mother’s Day!

  4. Unhappy resident of AOC’s socialist utopia here:

    Her ban on AirBnB has indeed been terrible for visitors to NYC (as PCC(E) might have noticed by his hotel bill last summer in Brooklyn at the conference)… and terrible for tourism.
    But its OK, NYC isn’t really very into tourism as a revenue generator….

    Just as dire, she PERSONALLY drove an anti-corporate jihad to keep an Amazon center out of Brooklyn, and with it thousands of middle class jobs.

    Now gather round while I tell you what she thinks of Israel…

    D.A.
    NYC 🗽

  5. I had never heard of Edward Jones. After reading your post, I googled The Known World, and it is now on my order list. Thanks for the recommendation.

    Indeed, what kind of idiot throws rocks at animals? And his attitude of entitlement makes it worse. We can hope that his identity will eventually be online, and then see how people, including his customers, react. I imagine that enough people will be angry – and it will hopefully seriously affect his business.

    AOC. She is clearly living in her own fantasy world, and/or trying to create a narrative. Perhaps she does not know enough history to know that many of the Founding Fathers were upper class gentlemen farmers? Or perhaps she discounts the old white men, and wants to claim that the Revolution was the uprising of the people of color? The ignorance of these woke folks is appalling (see Ilhan Omar: world war eleven. What a ditz, but a dangerous ditz.)

    1. I wonder if she can think of anything so highfalutin as the supposed intent of the Founding Fathers. She probably just read that bit about the revolution on her Twitter feed and thought, “Hey, I can use that…”

    2. Surely she once knew that the initial Cause for the Revolution wasn’t unfair inequality but unfair taxation. And the soi-disant patriots of a few decades ago called their movement the Tea Party, which was not at all about inviting everyone in for a cuppa (despite the rather Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland nature of the whole enterprise) .

      1. Up in our neck of the woods we learn that the Quebec Act (1774) was the last “intolerable Act” that precipitated the Revolution. The Stamp Act (“taxation without representation”) lasted only a year, repealed in response to riotous protest in 1766 and not quite forgotten by 1776. As to the Tea Party, also unpopular was the Boston Port Act which closed the port to commerce until the locals paid for the ruined tea. But the Quebec Act was the biggie because it prohibited European (i.e., “American”) settlement of the fertile lands between the Alleghenies and the Mississippi River, reserving it to the Crown and its wards, the Indians. This was Britain’s response to native fury (Pontiac’s War) at colonist encroachment on their land flouting the Royal Proclamation of 1763. The colonists regarded this former New France as their Promised Land: their militia had spilled blood in helping Britain wrest it from France in the recently concluded French and Indian War and they were itching to plough it (or speculate on it.)

        (The Quebec Act is regarded very differently in Canada, especially French Canada, compared with in the United States.)
        https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/quebec-act

        Ms. Ocasio-Cortez is probably not pleased to contemplate that the Revolution was, in the end, mostly to secure private land-owning opportunities against a mercantilist Crown overly indulgent of Indians and Catholics. Her notion that it was to depose an aristocracy is entirely absurd. It was to enshrine private property rights and expand the land-owning republican class, not to dispossess it. She may have her revolutions mixed up in her head.

        1. Believe it or not, in my day the schools were obliged to teach civics and US history, so I considered myself not ignorant of the major events. But I
          never heard of the Quebec Act before. And it’s even worthwhile to know as a citizen of the Commonwealth. Thank you.

  6. So Progressives are shifting from ‘the rich don’t pay their fair share’ to ‘billionaires shouldn’t exist.’ Pay attention folks, because ‘rich kulak’ isn’t an absolute designation, but a relative one. As for the American Revolution being a revolt againt ‘billionaires’, I’ll give AOC the benefit of the doubt and assume she means ‘the very rich’ (since there were no billionaires then [termed first coined in the 1840s]). She should look at who the Founders were, though. Hancock, Jefferson, Washington, Rutledge, there were many very rich people among the Founders, who would be surprised to learn they were the target of the Revolution.

  7. *The Movie “Saturday, October 7” comprises interviews with survivors of the the slaughter of Israelis in 2013,

    Just a friendly note: The date should surely be “2023”.

  8. Since an acquaintance of mine from the left of US complained at length about GOP gerrymandering, I ran some data analysis over the results of the last house election.

    If you remove districts from states and assign the seats of each state according to the share of the votes in that chair, the distribution in the house should be 223-206 in favor of the GOP. The state of gerrymandering in 2024 gave the Democrats a 6 seat boost.

  9. It was I who wrote the obituary. (For the sake of readers, I’m Jerry’s nephew, Steve.)

    She was a Girl Scout leader, for many years; she led my mom’s (your sister’s) troop. And when I was away at college, on the other side of the country, she wrote me a short letter every day. She never wanted me to find an empty mailbox, as she thought that would depress me. The notes were full of news from home, encouragement, and declarations like “If we can’t do big things, we can do small things in big ways.” Once she added a little cash and it never reached me, likely intercepted by a thief. In the next card she enclosed a note to the perpetrator: “Shame on you! My grandson is a student, and needs the money more than you do!” I guess she thought the gonif was screening all my mail.

    The quotation was something she’d copied down in her own unsteady hand and carried in her purse for years. Apparently it came from a poem by Henry Van Dyke called “Gone from My Sight.” I don’t know how she interpreted it, but it evidently had some significance to her. We still have the slip of paper.

    1. What a wonderful grandmother!

      And you confirmed what I suspected: that it was more likely that Jerry was just too busy with his own life as a youth to be aware of his sister and mother’s involvement in girl scouts than that the obit writer (you) just hallucinated that fact!

    2. Lovely story, thanks.

      Are you still reviewing movies? I remember Jerry posting the Golden Steve rewards, but I don’t remember seeing them for a couple years…I probably just missed it.

      Anyway, wanted to let you know I appreciated your reviews, thought they were spot on and watched some of the movies you highlighted (I probably wouldn’t have watched otherwise). “May December”…and I think “Anatomy of a Murder”

      Anyway, nice to read this post from you, and your cherished remembrance of Lillian. Cheers!

      1. Mark, thanks so much! Very kind of you to remember. Yes, I’m still reviewing movies. I don’t do the full slate of Golden Steve nominees anymore (the ceremony used to be a party in my apartment, but Covid put paid to the days of cramming two dozen people into a studio)… I do still announce winners, though!

        My favorite movie last year was Henry Fonda for President, a riveting essay film that views three centuries of American history through the lens of Henry Fonda’s career and personal life, from the colonial era to the rise of Reagan. Made by an Austrian film historian and curator named Alexander Horwath, this three-hour documentary offers one of the most unique and insightful perspectives I’ve ever encountered on social and political history, plus a breathtaking analysis of Fonda and all his contradictory facets. Sadly, though, there seems to be no way of accessing it at the moment, at least in the U.S. But keep it on your radar! Here’s my roster of winners:

        Best Picture: Henry Fonda for President
        Best Director: Jafar Panahi, It Was Just an Accident
        Best Actor: David Strathairn, A Little Prayer [not at all about religion!]
        Best Actress: Jennifer Lawrence, Die My Love
        Best Supporting Actor: Stellan Skarsgard, Sentimental Value
        Best Supporting Actress: Nina Hoss, Hedda
        Best Adapted Screenplay: One Battle After Another (Paul Thomas Anderson)
        Best Original Screenplay: Blue Moon (Robert Kaplow)
        Best Animated Feature: Little Amelie or the Character of Rain
        Best Nonfiction Film: Henry Fonda for President
        Best Foreign Language Film: It Was Just an Accident
        Best Original Song: “Train Dreams,” Train Dreams (Nick Cave, Bryce Dessner)

        1. Thanks for your response Steve, I appreciate it. Thanks for your roster as well, I’ll keep it handy- you again have listed some movies I haven’t heard of. And I’ll definitely check out Henry Fonda for President, sounds very unique and interesting and I love a good documentary. I like your song choice as well- excellent Cave/Dessner song (and movie imo).

  10. Liver and onions…my dad love it too. My mom made it for him pretty regularly. We kids (mercifully) got something else. He also liked buttermilk (yuck!)

  11. According to my log in default news update page, in the “on this day” slot:

    “May 11th, 1963: The Beatles start a 30-week run at No.1 on the UK album charts with their debut album ‘Please Please Me’. Recorded in less than 13 hours, the record becomes the longest running No.1 album by a group ever. The band’s follow up, ‘With the Beatles’ will replace it at the top of the charts on 7th December 1963 and stay there for 21 weeks.”

    “500+million records worldwide (including albums, singles, EPs, and compilations).”
    …the Beatles still generate millions in sales decades after disbanding.

    1. That’s pretty impressive, but Leibniz&Newton were directly responsible for millions of works even a century after disintegrating.

Leave a Reply to JBaldwin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *