Anti-Israel protestors vandalize Henry Moore sculpture on our campus, battle with police

October 12, 2024 • 11:00 am

It’s been quiet at the University of Chicago—too quiet!  We almost got through Students for Justice in Palestine’s “week of rage” without nary a megaphone blaring or any graffiti painted on campus walls and sidewalks. But, as I predicted, this was not to last. With Hamas losing the war with Israel, and all universities refusing to divest their endowment from any Israel-related companies, the protestors were bound to get even more enraged than last year.

They’re already back at it at Columbia University, and yesterday afternoon the terrorism-lovers struck our campus again. One of their targets was a famous Henry Moore sculpture on campus called “Nuclear Energy.” It sits on the site of the world’s first nuclear reactor, built by Fermi and his colleagues underneath the old Stagg Field, an athletic field. Wikipedia gives the themes of this work:

Moore cited a number of inspirations for the sculpture, from earlier works with similar forms to natural objects like stones. About the shape of the sculpture, Moore said:

When I had made this working model I showed it to them and they liked my idea because the top of it is like some large mushroom, or a kind of mushroom cloud. Also it has a kind of head shape like the top of the skull but down below is more an architectural cathedral. One might think of the lower part of it being a protective form and constructed for human beings and the top being more like the idea of the destructive side of the atom. So between the two it might express to people in a symbolic way the whole event. (Henry Moore quoted in Art Journal, New York, Spring 1973, p.286)

Moore’s work explores the hopes and fears of the Atomic Age. The potential of controlled nuclear power or a nuclear holocaust is tied to the historical events of the site with the iconography of a mushroom cloud or skull, supported by pillars topped by arches like a protective cathedral. Interviews with Moore highlight the dual nature of the top and bottom portions of the sculpture, meant to represent the creative and destructive power possible with nuclear energy. An abstract sculpture was chosen by the University to highlight the importance of the events at the site, and their implications for humanity, rather than the importance of Fermi in bringing them about.

Curiously, this campus attraction draws a lot of Japanese tourists, who visit it by the busload, competing to have their picture taken in front of the mushroom cloud.

But yesterday, the enraged activists covered it with red paint and then spray-painted “FREE GAZA” on the sidewalk beside it. Here’s a picture taken by a member of the University community, who sent it to me.  What on earth do the protestors think they are accomplishing by doing this? They sure aren’t enlisting sympathy. They are simply acting out, like the petulant toddlers they are.

The person who took the photo sent it to me along with this email (all words and photos are used with permission):

I just came back to work to find this (see attached). It is probably a very good thing that I was not around a few minutes ago.
The protestors are now one block down and I cannot see any signs of arrests having been made, regardless of heavy UC and City police presence. About one hundred and fifty children of privilege, calling the UC Police “the KKK’. To their face—with most officers present being black. We are dealing with imbeciles of a species the world has never seen before.
Every single student involved in the desecration of this monument needs to be expelled, ipso facto. The whole lot.

Another member of the University community weighed in, and sent some photographs as well:

Today at about 3pm, pro-Palestine protesters forcefully attempted to lock the University gate on 57th Street with chains and padlocks. Two brave UChicago police officers fought back and were able to prevent that. Police cars joined the scene shortly afterwards. I was about to walk through the gate when this happened.

Actually, according to the news report below, they protestors did lock the gate.

Below: the photos (captions are mine). The protestors put their signs on Hull Gate, which is right outside my building, and then tried to lock the gate so their signs would be visible and conspicuous (see more below):

Both campus cops and Chicago city police were on the site. Here two campus cops try to prevent the protestors from locking the gate, the main entry from the north to the Quad:

Note that many of the protestors are masked. That is not for health reasons, but because they are cowards, fearful of being identified because they might be punished. Many are also wearing keffiyehs, sometimes described as “swastikas for hipsters”.

Whoops—there’s a coward inside the gate:

Masks everywhere. I can’t tell you how reprehensible I find acts of civil disobedience that are not only not peaceful, but whose perps try to disguise themselves:

The outside. Whoops, we have an identifiable human here:

More from outside the gate. My building is to the left, and the Anatomy building, housing Organismal Biology and Anatomy, is to the right:

University of Chicago cops on the scene:

The student newspaper, the Chicago Maroon, did a live-stream report on the protests that is now a full news report. There were student scuffles with cops, three arrests, and reports that police used batons and pepper spray. Here are a few indented excerpts from the news, with my words flush left.

A UChicago United for Palestine (UCUP) rally saw three protesters arrested and physical altercations between protesters and officers. Earlier, protesters locked Cobb Gate using a bike lock despite UCPD’s efforts to keep the gate open. During the rally multiple police officers used pepper spray and batons. Protesters damaged UCPD vehicles and kicked at least one officer.

The rally, which began with a walk out at 2:30 p.m., morphed into a brawl that involved at least 200 University- and community-affiliated protesters, 20 University of Chicago Police Department (UCPD) officers, and 30 Chicago Police Department (CPD) officers.

Deans-on-Call informed UCPD at approximately 2:15 p.m., that the University had “zero tolerance” for excessive noise before attempting to hand out warning cards to protest leaders using bullhorns to lead chants on the quad at 2:45 p.m. The cards read, “FINAL WARNING: This card serves to inform you or your student organization that your conduct is violating policies outlined in the Student Manual.” The cards also contained four QR codes linked to relevant University policies, which were updated in advance of the beginning of the academic year. Protesters refused to accept the cards.

The Deans-on-Call have always been useless in these altercations. From the lack of punishments last year, the protestors know that “zero tolerance” really means “infinite tolerance.”

. . . At approximately 3 p.m., protesters marched from the center of the quad and proceeded through the Hull and Cobb Gates on the north end. Once all protesters had passed through Cobb Gate, protesters pushed the gate closed and secured it with a bike lock despite police attempts to stop them. They also hung a banner on the gate that read “Free Palestine” and “Hands Off Lebanon.”

By this point, the protest had grown to include over 150 people, spilling out onto East 57th Street. Protesters allowed space for cars to pass through, but UCPD patrol cars blocked the street on both ends.

Protesters told police officers “Pigs go home” and chanted “Intifada, intifada, long live the intifada.”

The “intifada” is an armed uprising of Palestinians against Israel. The protestors want that, and doubtless many of them are proud of the butchery of October 7.

At 3:15 p.m., protesters left Cobb Gate and proceeded north on S. Ellis Avenue. They stopped in front of the Nuclear Energy Sculpture next to the Regenstein Library, at which point some protesters threw paint on the statue and wrote graffiti in the surrounding area that read “Free Gaza,” “hands off Lebonan” [sic], and “fuck the bombs.” CPD officers arrived on scene, joining at least 20 UCPD officers. Some were in riot gear and carried batons and zip-ties.

At approximately 3:30 p.m., the protest moved further north along the street, stopping between Ratner Athletics Center and the Court Theater. Police searched for and then tackled and detained one protester, whom they put into a patrol car. Protesters attempted to prevent the detainment, physically confronting officers. The Maroon was unable to confirm why that protester was detained.

Other protesters began chanting “Let him go!” and surrounded the patrol car that held the detained protester. An officer attempted to drive the UCPD patrol car away from the scene but was blocked by the crowd of protesters. Officers and protesters continued to push against each other.

Another protester struck the side mirror of a separate police car several times with what appeared to be a rock and then rejoined the crowd.

As tensions escalated, a third protester kicked a CPD officer in the back of his leg. Officers attempted to detain the protester, hitting him with a baton. They chased him briefly and tackled him halfway down the block, at which point they detained him and placed him into a patrol car.

The attack on cops takes the protest out of the realm of civil disobedience, which is supposed to be peaceful protests. And of course rule #1 of that type of demonstration is NEVER HIT A COP.

Officers used pepper spray on protesters, who were seen afterward rubbing and washing their eyes with water. One student told the Maroon that he was pepper sprayed by an officer who had “harassed students at the encampment.” A Maroon reporter witnessed a UCPD officer inadvertently pepper spraying a Chicago Police Department Captain, an incident which the UCPD officer later apologized for.

I don’t know about the pepper spray, but I saw the encampment taken down, at least the beginning of it, and I saw no harassment of students by the University police.

At approximately 3:45 p.m., protesters began dispersing north along South Ellis Avenue, south towards the quad, and through the SMART Museum courtyard. One CPD officer remarked to gathered officers, “that was fun for a little while.” Shortly after, CPD and UCPD officers also dispersed. By 4 p.m., the lock on Cobb Gate was removed and the gate was reopened.

And of course the mess around the sculpture, involving painted vandalism, had to be cleaned up by workers from Facilities. The protestors don’t care that workers have clean up after them.

The University issued a statement (below) that seems to me a bit ambiguous. Yes, university policiers prohibit disruptive violations and destruction of property, but what will happen if (as happened during the last academic year) the arrested protestors have their charges dropped by the Chicago district attorney, who seems sympathetic to the protests?  Here’s the statement:

According to a University spokesperson, “the University of Chicago is fundamentally committed to upholding the rights of protesters to express their views on any issue. At the same time, University policies make it clear that protests cannot jeopardize public safety, disrupt the University’s operations, or involve the destruction of property.”

This year, I hope, the University will actually enforce violations of the law and of university regulations. As far as I know, despite arrests and dismantling of the encampment last academic year, in the end not a single student was punished. Last spring I recounted four protests by Students for Justice in Palestine and their umbrella organization, UChicago United, and yet though all of these constituted legal or university violations, not a single student was punished. 13 of them had their degrees withheld, but they all got them reinstated after a short while. And though a sit-in in the admissions office led to the arrest for criminal trespassing of 28 people by Chicago Police (18 undergraduates, eight graduate students, and two professors), all the charges were dropped.

As far as I know—and there may be proceedings of which I’m unaware—the only punishment meted out the entire academic year was a mild rebuke to Students for Justice in Palestine–just a note on their record that if they continue to violate university regulations, there may be trouble for them in the future.

Frankly, I’m tired of the University proclaiming that violations will be punished, but then doing nothing about it. I don’t want to live through another year with protestors illegally shouting through megaphones during class hours, spraying graffiti on University walls, and holding sit-ins in University buildings.  Many of us feel that the University, despite eventually dismantling the illegal encampment, is doing as little as it can to punish protestors—perhaps because they don’t want the attention. But if this kind of mishigas continues, it will eventually lead to more attention focused on the University of Chicago, and perhaps, as has happened at Harvard, a decline in the number of Jewish students applying for admission.

21 thoughts on “Anti-Israel protestors vandalize Henry Moore sculpture on our campus, battle with police

  1. I don’t mean to neglect the mishigas, but just wanted to note the sculpture reminds me of the “rope trick” nuclear detonation test photo.

    But not exactly.

  2. Dr. Coyne, did you see Bill Maher’s latest “New Rule,” titled “Dear Chappell Roan”? I found it to be yet another very powerful statement by Maher in support of Israel and condemnation of the stupidity of the pro-Palestine mob.

  3. I was not far from there – I was walking from Medici to Abbott hall around that time, but I wanted to stop by Harper Memorial Library to admire it one last time before leaving town and so I was on the south side of the Quad, blissfully unaware of the protest.
    My heart / trust in humans breaks a bit more with every idiotic “protest”. I’m trying to write the keffiyeh Karens off as dumb conformist children but obviously they’re getting their misinformation and distorted world view from a more nefarious source.

  4. If the University isn’t going to punish these rioters, I hope someone starts publishing their faces and names (when the keffiyehs slip). I would refuse to hire any of these terrorist supporters.

    1. Good idea. As we’ve seen, nothing will be done to even the ones who are caught, so maybe “catch and release” with name and photo published is a good compromise. That way, the Iranian government will have an easier time recruiting.

      1. HAHHA. Top notch, Darryl.
        That is exactly how the Iranian diplomatic services work. We have seen it with the assassination plot of that lady Iranian activist here (forget her name right now).

        The Iranians search for fearless, reckless young fanatics to use in their terrorism. Happened a lot in the UK also and western intelligence agencies take note.

        D.A.
        NYC

        1. Once you’re in it a little bit, you’re in it all the way. Both the Mafia and the espionage/terrorist racket work this way.

          The universities are on their own. Clearly the state’s legal representatives have judged that prosecution of vandals, trespassers, and assaulters on campus is not in the public interest any more than prosecution of such crimes anywhere else is. At least the DAs are being even-handed about it.

  5. I find this truly bizarre. 1200 Israelis dead, many of them brutalized in disgusting ways. 250 hostages taken, 100 still held in Gaza, perhaps many of them dead. And in response, 40,000 Palestinians dead if not more, perhaps a quarter of them children, and an entire region reduced to rubble. Meanwhile. Americans are clutching their pearls over student misbehavior. Your tax dollars paid for the inattention of the Israeli government and are paying for that government’s response to its own failure. I don’t believe that the generation of ’68 would have held back any more than today’s youngsters, and I’m sure that today’s old farts were once the people their parents warned them against.

    1. Well, I guess the important thing is that you found a way to feel superior to both.

    2. Blaming the victim for the attack? I agree that it is a failure of intelligence gathering for Israel to miss the impending attack, but the implication is that it is then Israel’s fault that so many died on October 7th.

    3. Well, well, well, here we have the Hamas figures presented uncritically, with no indication that a substantial portion of the dead Gazans (perhaps more than half) were Hamas fighters. Where did you get the number of dead Gazan children, by the way?

      And of course there is the blaming of all of that on Israel and not Hamas. And no, I protested in the Sixties but it was against an unjust war. Israels response to Hamas (or Hezbollah) is not unjust.

    4. How many Nazis did we have to kill to defeat Germany? No one ever called for a ‘cease fire with Germany’ when Patton marched through Europe.

      This is a battle between a civilized thought and a religion of intolerance/violence. The scales of Justice are never meant to be even as in 1 life for 1 life when the Just face the unjust. Hamas called for the destruction of Israel in its original charter. They should not be tolerated.

    5. How do you “pay for inattention”? Bribe the guards to look the other way? Do you really think American tax dollars did that?

      You seem to be ignorant about how war works. Even if you yourself think Iran should conquer Israel, any state that is attacked by another will declare war on the attacker and try, to the extent it can, to destroy the attacker’s ability to make war. Expecting Israel not to fight when it can, or to stop fighting just because of destruction it causes in Gaza is either foolish or partisan. Regardless of whose side you’re on, or how lukewarm and ambivalent your sympathy for Israel might be*, Israel knows what side it’s on. You can’t expect it to be ambivalent as a state. (Some Israelis are ambivalent as individuals, OK.) Once war starts, any failures that led up to it just have to sucked up. “Coulda, woulda, shoulda…” Sure.
      ————————-
      * What I often hear is “Israel has the right to defend itself [Gee, thanks!], but…” only if no one on the other side gets hurt. (Always wait for the negatory “but”.)

  6. Good photos, PCC(E).

    Maybe if we run out of wildlife pics for WEIT you could start a “Idiot terrorist punks in the wild” series? HHAHA

    Kidding aside, they’re newspaper quality pics.

    And eff those idiot little fools. We can’t arrest them (except for the illegal paint bombing – “Off to the paddy wagon for YOU, punk. That spray can is now evidence. Better call your Daddy to pull you outta your own trouble again!”)/
    …… BUT..
    we can know who they are and know that there are people that deranged and frankly, dangerous among us.
    Make them famous.

    D.A.
    NYC

  7. Maybe publish names and pictures of senior uchicago administrators who malfeasance and dare I say in loco parentis misparenting allows for these senseless disruptions to continue. Time to call out paul and his boys and girls.

  8. Why are such destructive “students” not just simply kicked out? Why does the university tolerate this behavior? These are people who are there to have “fun” and to make themselves into people who’re “doing the right thing.” It, of course, is the “wrong thing,” and they. are well aware of that which makes it all the more exciting. So they are really just a bunch of jerks and criminals. No good there! Why are schools so reluctant to kick them out? That would take the fun out – the feeling of righteousness. Cornell graduate long ago, anthropology/archeology professor for 35 years.

Comments are closed.