Missed post on the binary nature of sex; link here

March 8, 2024 • 10:42 am

This morning I prematurely put up my post with the title below, an analysis and critique of a wonky paper in American Scientist by two anthropologists, an anatomist, and gender-and-sexuality-studies professor, all arguing strenuously that sex isn’t a binary, nor is it best defined by gamete type.

What were the sweating professors trying to say? I’m putting up this post to call attention to the post that didn’t go out by email, since most people seem to read posts on their phones these days.

Click below to go to my original critique, or go here.

2 thoughts on “Missed post on the binary nature of sex; link here

Comments are closed.