Tuesday: Hili dialogue

February 13, 2024 • 6:45 am

Welcome to the Crueliest Day: Tuesday, February 13, 2024, and National Italian Food Day, a day of massive cultural appropriation. But it’s appropriate that I’m appropriating, as I’m having Fettuccine Alfredo tonight with a dry Australian Riesling.

It’s also Kiss Day, National Crab Rangoon Day, Mardi Gras, National Tortellini Day, International Pancake Day (a day for going to IHOP), National Cheddar Day (give me Keen’s Farmhouse Cheddar, perferably with a touch of mold), Pączki Day  (a filled Polish yeast donut, and very yummy), and World Radio Day.

Pączki:

Attribution: “Fir0002/Flagstaffotos”.

Readers are welcome to mark notable events, births, or deaths on this by consulting the February 13 Wikipedia page.

Da Nooz:

*The release of two hostages in a daring IDF raid has much heartened Israel, although the NYT makes much of the Palestinians killed—without mentioning that the IDF killed at least four dozen Hamas members, without even thinking that those might be the “Palestinians”:

Israeli security forces said early Monday that they had freed two hostages who were being held in the southern Gazan city of Rafah, in only the second known rescue of its kind in Gaza since the start of the war. Officials in Gaza said that accompanying Israeli strikes had killed dozens of Palestinians in the city overnight.

The hostages, Fernando Simon Marman, 60, and Louis Har, 70, were undergoing tests at a hospital near Tel Aviv and were both in good condition, according to a joint statement from the Israeli military, the police and the domestic security agency, Shin Bet.

“Fernando and Louis, welcome home,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement. “I salute our brave fighters for the daring action that led to their release.”

Mr. Netanyahu’s office said that Mr. Marman and Mr. Har were both dual citizens of Israel and Argentina. They were among more than 240 people captured during the surprise Oct. 7 raid on southern Israel by Hamas and other militant groups. Israel said it launched attacks in Rafah to provide cover for the rescue.

The two men, looking gaunt but not visibly harmed, cried and embraced family members who had come to be reunited with them at Sheba Medical Center, according to video released by the Israeli military.

But the Times also says this:

Israeli special operations forces raided a building in the southern Gazan city of Rafah early Monday to free two hostages held by Hamas, the military said, as Israel launched a wave of attacks overnight that killed dozens of Palestinians in Rafah, according to the Gazan health ministry.

Note that this information just says “dozens of Palestinians”, and of course the “Gazan health ministry” is run by Hamas. The Times of Israel gives a detailed scenario of the raid, which appears to have been carefully targeted. I thus suspect that many if not all of the “dozens of Palestinians” were members of Hamas or other terrorist fighters.  That doesn’t keep the NYT from putting up a headline like this (they can’t give good news for Israel without adding the death toll, never distinguishing between terrorists and non-fighters:

*The WSJ has a headline that “Israel proposes Rafah evacuation despite U.S. concerns” (the U.S. seemingly wants Israel to lose this war), and yet my Hebrew-media-reading contacts tell me that the evacuation is already underway. (A link here to Hebrew media is useless. Be patient.)

Israel is proposing the creation of sprawling tent cities in Gaza as part of an evacuation plan to be funded by the U.S. and its Arab Gulf partners ahead of an impending invasion of a city in the strip’s south, where 1.2 million Palestinians are sheltering and which Israel says is the last bastion of Hamas.

The proposal, which was presented to Egypt in recent days, came as the Biden administration warned Israel against going into Rafah without a detailed plan to protect civilians. Israeli officials pushed back, saying they must carry out a ground offensive in Rafah to eradicate Hamas.

Early Monday local time, Israel conducted a rescue operation that freed two hostages in Rafah, where Israel says many of the remaining hostages are being held.

The proposal includes establishing 15 campsites of around 25,000 tents each across the southwestern part of the Gaza Strip, Egyptian officials said. Egypt would be in charge of setting up the camps and field hospitals, the officials said.

The plan indicates that Israel is planning an imminent invasion of Rafah, despite U.S. and Egyptian concerns. Egypt hasn’t commented publicly on the Israeli proposal. Cairo has said that it would suspend a 1979 peace treaty with Israel if Palestinians crossed the border from Rafah to flee an Israeli offensive, The Wall Street Journal has reported.

Let’s face it: if Israel doesn’t go into Rafah, where the leadership of Hamas is holed up, it will lose the war.  Of course it must have a plan to evacuate civilians, but those civilians won’t be going to Egypt, which doesn’t want them, even temporarily.  Israel will go into Rafah, and I’m optimistic that Hamas will indeed be destroyed. But, as Douglas Murray likes to say, “Israel is the only country in the world that’s not allowed to win a war.” No matter how it responded to October 7, the world would be calling for a ceasefire, the withdrawal of Israel back into its borders, and, therefore, the resurgence of Hamas. But perhaps Biden doesn’t want Israel to lose, but really only wants to be elected and simply doesn’t care what happens to Israel. Whatever the case, his actions don’t comport with his statement that the U.S. is behind eliminating Hamas.

A comment from Malgorzata:

The UN will not help to move civilians to total safety in Egypt because they will not be party to “forced expulsion”! Talk about hypocrisy! And the US is talking only about pressure on Israel and not about pressure on Hamas to let unlawfully kidnapped people go without any conditions. There is no pressure on Qatar to arrest the leaders of the terrorists who murdered, raped and kidnapped the teople of a sovereign country!

A tweet from the EoZ. The truth is on the right:

*U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, who was secretly hospitalized for prostate cancer (and put in the ER), got into big trouble for not telling his associates, or President Biden. He didn’t make that mistake this time, but, sadly, he was rushed to the hospital again.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin was hospitalized on Sunday after suffering an “emergent bladder issue,” the Pentagon said, less than a month after he spent nearly two weeks in intensive care with complications from a surgery to treat prostate cancer.

Austin’s doctors, John Maddox and Gregory Chestnut, said in a statement that Austin was admitted to the critical care unit at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center for “supportive care and close monitoring” after his security team transported him earlier in the day with symptoms “suggesting an emergent bladder issue.” It is not clear how long he could remain hospitalized, they said, but he is expected to make a full recovery from prostate cancer.

“His cancer prognosis remains excellent,” the doctors said in a statement released near midnight. “Updates on the Secretary’s condition will be provided as soon as possible.”

On Monday, a defense official said Austin would not travel as planned to NATO headquarters in Brussels later this week. He had been expected to attend a gathering of NATO defense ministers and another meeting for officials whose countries are involved with the effort to support Ukraine in its war against Russia.

A Pentagon spokesman, Maj. Gen. Patrick Ryder, said in a statement Sunday night that Austin had transferred his duties and functions to Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks about 4:55 p.m. The White House, Congress and the Pentagon’s top military officer, Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr., all were notified, Ryder said.

Austin had not resumed his duties as of Monday afternoon, the defense official said. This person spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the secretary’s hospitalization.

Do we have a doctor in the house who can guess about what teh “bladder issue” is?

*From Jez Grove in Old Blighty, we hear about a BBC story. This is Jez’s writing:

This is pretty shocking. The Labour Party candidate in an upcoming parliamentary by-election made a statement that Israel allowed the 7 October attacks to take place so that it could do what it liked to Palestinians in Gaza. It is too late now to replace him as the candidate, and they continue to support him. He isn’t fit to be a member of parliament!By contrast, a couple of months ago a female candidate in a less important local council election was suspended from the local party for saying things about biological sex and it stopped campaigning for her. Labour duly lost the seat to the Conservatives. The party subsequently found that she had done nothing wrong, but it was too late by then.

And from the BBC:

Labour has defended standing by its candidate in the Rochdale by-election, despite his remarks about Israel.

Shadow minister Nick Thomas-Symonds told the BBC Azhar Ali’s comments were “completely and utterly unacceptable”.

However, he said the prospective MP understood the “gravity of the offence that has been caused” and had “unreservedly apologised”.

The Conservatives are urging Labour to suspend Mr Ali from the party and stop campaigning for him in Rochdale.

Party chair Richard Holden said: “If Labour won’t do that, the public will see that Labour is happy to run antisemitic candidates to attract racist votes and is therefore unfit to play a leading role in our nation’s affairs.”

Mr Ali is alleged to have told a Labour party meeting that Israel had “allowed” the deadly attack by Hamas gunmen on 7 October.

As Jez said, it’s too late to withdraw Ali, but is Labour happy with being represented by such a man? Well, one wary member thinks he can rehabilitate himself:

Mr Thomas-Symonds confirmed Labour would continue to campaign for Mr Ali in Rochdale, who he said had “fallen for a conspiracy theory” but that there was a need to “do a tremendous amount of work to rebuild trust with the Jewish community”.

He pointed to comments from former MP Louise Ellman, who has backed Mr Ali.

Dame Louise quit Labour in 2019 over a “growth of antisemitism” in the party, but re-joined in 2021, saying she was “confident” party leader Sir Keir Starmer was tackling the issue.

On Sunday, she wrote on X, that Mr Ali’s comments had been “out of character”.

“I have known Azhar for over twenty years and he consistently supported me when I was subjected to antisemitic attacks.

“He should now have the opportunity to work with the Jewish community to restore the loss of trust his actions have caused.”

I’m glad that I’m not British and in that district, and I’d have a hard time voting for Ali. The Guardian also has the story and gives what Ali said:

The recording, obtained by the Mail on Sunday, had Ali saying: “The Egyptians are saying that they warned Israel 10 days earlier … Americans warned them a day before [that] … there’s something happening. They deliberately took the security off, they allowed … that massacre that gives them the green light to do whatever they bloody want.”

I don’t get it. Has Labour traditionally been antisemitic? If not, what happened?

UPDATE: From Jez: “Labour have seen sense and withdrawn support for the anti-Semitic candidate. It’s too late for them to replace him so he will still appear on the ballot paper listed as representing them though, so it’s possible that he could still be elected. What a mess!”

*A kiss was the most important part of the Superbowl:

With the run she’s having, how could Taylor Swift be on anything other than the winning side?

She embraced her boyfriend Travis Kelce and the couple locked lips on the field at Allegiant Stadium after his Kansas City Chiefs beat the San Francisco 49ers 25-22 in the Super Bowl.

Moments earlier, Swift smiled with her eyes looking misty from tears as she stood next to Kelce’s mother while he held aloft the Lombardi Trophy, shouting “Chiefs nation!” and bellowing a chorus of “Viva Las Vegas.”

Minutes before that, she was smothered by celebrity suite mates, who at various points included Blake Lively, Ice Spice and Lana Del Rey, when the Chiefs scored the winning touchdown in overtime, set up by a key reception by Kelce for a first down.

It was the second straight Super Bowl win for the Chiefs, but the first since Swift became fan-in-chief. She and Kelce began dating shortly before the season started.

It completes an epic stretch for Swift, who won album of the year a week earlier for a record fourth time at the Grammys, where she also announced a new album dropping in April before jetting off to Japan for a series of stadium shows.

Soon after flying halfway around the world to get to the game, she strolled through security to enter the stadium along with Lively, Ice Spice and her mom, Andrea Swift. She cuddled with Lively during Post Malone’s performance of “America the Beautiful” and won what appeared to be a beer chugging contest, slamming her cup down to an appreciative roar from the fans.

I have no prognostications whether this relationship will last or, like all of Swift’s beaux, Kelce will become just a reference in a song.  Nor do I care much, but most of the world does.  Lord knows how much money Swift has brought to the NFL:

The video:

Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is cold:

Hili: Fetch the wood and make a fire in the fireplace.
A: I don’t have time.
Hili: Change your priorities.
In Polish:
Hili: Przynieś drewno i napal w kominku.
Ja: Nie mam czasu.
Hili: Zmień priorytety.

*******************

From Unique Birds and Animals:

From the same site:

From Linkiest:

Masih is very concerned with a pornstar being invited to visit Iran, and then covering herself up. Here’s the translation from Google:

In this part #تبلت I explain how to maintain the holy system of the Islamic Republic; First, they turn the tent into a coat skirt, and then when it reaches the legs, they pull the same coat skirt down from the women’s feet to raise their system. That is, the hijab #مهسا_امينى [Mehsa Amini] was “disgusting” and should have been killed, but the hijab of the American porn star and the women participating in the 22 Bahman march is suitable for the Islamic scholars and the heads of the country and the army in the Islamic Republic. Apparently, the same brothers who are provoked by seeing two strands of Iranian women’s hair and fall into corruption and sin, their aspect and capacity in dealing with American porn stars are very high. A porn star who wears a headscarf when she comes to Iran and writes to freedom-loving women: “Iran is safe if you follow the rules.” To explain that; Whitney’s being a porn star in this program “Whitney is not criticized by me, but by wearing the forced hijab and participating in the propaganda of the government that we criticize. As before, I criticized Western politicians when they wore hijab when entering Iran.

Full-throat “affirmative care” gender activism takes a hit. No more advising parents: “do you want a live son or a dead daughter?”

The statement can be found here; a few quotes below:

The

From Simon; for many, this was the most important part of the Superbowl.

From Barry (second tweet): a conversation between a woman and a parrot. But what’s the language? (You’ve already seen the big tiger but I haven’t learned how to unlink linked tweets.)

From Malcolm; some cats with OCD, others “normal” (?):

From the Auschwitz Memorial, an eight-year old girl gassed upon arrival:

One tweet from Dr. Cobb, who should be heading back to England now. Ducklings!

 

39 thoughts on “Tuesday: Hili dialogue

  1. “Captured during the surprise Oct 7 raid”: so the nyt refers to the terrorist attack now as simply a “raid”. A similar subtlety is found in WAPO articles which always refer to an “Israel Gaza” war rather than “Israeli Hamas” war.

    1. I don’t object to the “Israel-Gaza War” language. Hamas is not a state. It is the gang of thugs that governs Gaza, which is a state. Israel has declared war on Gaza and is entitled to use all the engines of war against it as a hostile state. That there might, or might not, be “innocent civilians” in Gaza has no bearing on the state of war between it and Israel, precipitated by the actions of Gaza’s government and endorsed by its citizenry. If there were an armed faction in Gaza that was fighting against Hamas and trying to overthrow it, then there would need to be more precise language (and more precise targeting to hit the right gunmen) but there seems not to be.

      (Whether this is why the newspapers refer to the Israel-Gaza war I do not know.)

  2. Of course, the irony is that if Hamas had done on October 7th to any Arab country, Gaza would have been leveled the next day with 300,000+ dead. And no one would care or say anything.

    And oft-forgotten is that Egypt, Gaza’s Arab brethren have blockaded Gaza since 2006.

  3. Reference the antisemitic UK labour candidate.
    “Rochdale” isn’t that the UK City/ Town that had gangs of predominantly muslim men raping and grooming young “white” girls whilst the authorities including the police ignored the problem because they did not want to antagonize the local immigrant community?
    I believe that this situation persisted for some years before any action was undertaken and this only after a television documentary.
    The UK Labour party and supporters for this individual are as damaged as the antisemitic candidate .
    No change there then, the UK Islamic fifth column is flourishing in Rochdale.

    1. Rochdale was one town among many with a grooming gang problem, which largely remains unaddressed. Rotherham was probably the worst, and Telford was also a shocking case.
      The Labour MP for Bradford, Naz Shah, tweeted “Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity.” She took it down after eight minutes and said it had been posted in error. But this shows what the Labour party is about in this respect—pandering to the local “community” to get votes at whatever price. Another Labour MP, Sarah Champion, who represents Rotherham, had to resign from the shadow cabinet when she wrote a newspaper article about “the problem of white girls being raped and exploited by British Pakistani men.” Naz Shah called that “incendiary and irresponsible.”

      1. Well, thanks for that information, worse than I thought but the reaction of the local muslim community hierarchy and the UK Labour mob does not surprise me one iota. One day western democratic countries might wake up to this problem but I am not holding my breath.
        The Islamic fifth column is flourishing more than just in Rochdale!

      2. For accuracy, Naz Shah retweeted someone else’s statement to that effect, rather than writing it herself.

        I don’t think that makes it any better.

  4. Thanks to Matthew for a mini reminder of the sights and sounds of Caenhill morning rush hour. I have missed the proprietor’s voice and the animals starting their day.

    1. Caen Hill, I remember it well, famous flight of broad locks on the Kennet and Avon Canal near Devizes. I helped with some restoration when stationed in the RAF at Colerne near Bath, many moons ago when the Kennet and Avon Canal was in very poor condition.

  5. On this day:
    1258 – Siege of Baghdad: Hulegu Khan, a prince of the Mongol Empire, orders his army to sack and plunder the city of Baghdad, which they had just captured.

    1322 – The central tower of Ely Cathedral falls on the night of 12th–13th.

    1542 – Catherine Howard, the fifth wife of Henry VIII of England, is executed for adultery.

    1633 – Galileo Galilei arrives in Rome for his trial before the Inquisition.

    1642 – The Clergy Act becomes law, excluding bishops of the Church of England from serving in the House of Lords. [They’re back now, though, thanks (!) to the 1661 Clergy Act.]

    1689 – William and Mary are proclaimed co-rulers of England.

    1692 – Massacre of Glencoe: Almost 80 Macdonalds at Glen Coe, Scotland are killed early in the morning for not promptly pledging allegiance to the new king, William of Orange.

    1880 – Thomas Edison observes Thermionic emission.

    1913 – The 13th Dalai Lama proclaims Tibetan independence following a period of domination by Manchu Qing dynasty and initiated a period of almost four decades of independence.

    1920 – The Negro National League is formed.

    1935 – A jury in Flemington, New Jersey finds Bruno Hauptmann guilty of the 1932 kidnapping and murder of the Lindbergh baby, the son of Charles Lindbergh.

    1945 – World War II: Royal Air Force bombers are dispatched to Dresden, Germany to attack the city with a massive aerial bombardment.

    1955 – Israel obtains four of the seven Dead Sea Scrolls.

    1960 – With the success of a nuclear test codenamed “Gerboise Bleue”, France becomes the fourth country to possess nuclear weapons.

    1960 – Black college students stage the first of the Nashville sit-ins at three lunch counters in Nashville, Tennessee.

    1961 – An allegedly 500,000-year-old rock is discovered near Olancha, California, US, that appears to anachronistically encase a spark plug.

    1990 – German reunification: An agreement is reached on a two-stage plan to reunite Germany.

    1991 – Gulf War: Two laser-guided “smart bombs” destroy the Amiriyah shelter in Baghdad. Allied forces said the bunker was being used as a military communications outpost, but over 400 Iraqi civilians inside were killed.

    2004 – The Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics announces the discovery of the universe’s largest known diamond, white dwarf star BPM 37093. Astronomers named this star “Lucy” after The Beatles’ song “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds”.

    2008 – Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd makes a historic apology to the Indigenous Australians and the Stolen Generations.

    2012 – The European Space Agency (ESA) conducted the first launch of the European Vega rocket from Europe’s spaceport in Kourou, French Guiana.

    2017 – Kim Jong-nam, brother of North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un, is assassinated at Kuala Lumpur International Airport.

    2021 – Former U.S. President Donald Trump is acquitted in his second impeachment trial.

    2021 – A major winter storm causes blackouts and kills at least 82 people in Texas and northern Mexico.

    Births:
    1728 – John Hunter, Scottish surgeon and anatomist (d. 1793).

    1766 – Thomas Robert Malthus, English economist and scholar (d. 1834).

    1870 – Leopold Godowsky, Polish-American pianist and composer (d. 1938).

    1881 – Eleanor Farjeon, English author, poet, and playwright (d. 1965).

    1891 – Kate Roberts, Welsh author and activist (d. 1985).

    1903 – Georges Simenon, Belgian-Swiss author (d. 1989).

    1910 – William Shockley, English-American physicist and academic, Nobel Prize laureate (d. 1989).

    1916 – Dorothy Bliss, American invertebrate zoologist (d. 1987).

    1923 – Chuck Yeager, American general and pilot; first test pilot to break the sound barrier (d. 2020).

    1926 – Fay Ajzenberg-Selove, American nuclear physicist (d. 2012).

    1933 – Kim Novak, American actress.

    1934 – George Segal, American actor (d. 2021).

    1938 – Oliver Reed, English actor (d. 1999).

    1942 – Peter Tork, American singer-songwriter, bass player, and actor (d. 2019).

    1944 – Stockard Channing, American actress.

    1944 – Jerry Springer, English-American television host, actor, and politician, 56th Mayor of Cincinnati (d. 2023).

    1945 – Marian Dawkins, English biologist and academic. [Extremely accomplished ex-wife of Richard Dawkins.]

    1945 – Simon Schama, English historian and author.

    1950 – Peter Gabriel, English singer-songwriter and musician.

    1956 – Peter Hook, English singer, songwriter, bass player, multi-instrumentalist, and record producer.

    1974 – Robbie Williams, English singer-songwriter.

    1979 – Rachel Reeves, English economist and politician, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer.

    I find by my calculations, which are according to revealed inspiration, that the sword of death is now approaching us, in the shape of pestilence, war more horrible than has been known in three lifetimes, and famine. (Nostradamus):
    1859 – Eliza Acton, English food writer and poet (b. 1799). [Today’s Woman of the Day, see next post below.]

    1883 – Richard Wagner, German composer (b. 1813).

    1952 – Josephine Tey, Scottish author and playwright (b. 1896).

    1958 – Christabel Pankhurst, English activist, co-founded the Women’s Social and Political Union (b. 1880).

    1980 – David Janssen, American actor (b. 1931).

    2002 – Waylon Jennings, American singer-songwriter and guitarist (b. 1937).

    2012 – Louise Cochrane, American-English screenwriter and producer (b. 1918).

    2016 – Antonin Scalia, American lawyer and judge, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (b. 1936).

    2017 – Aileen Hernandez, American union organizer and activist (b. 1926).

    1. Woman of the Day:
      [Text from Wikipedia]

      Eliza Acton (born 17 April 1799, died on this day in 1859) was an English food writer and poet who produced one of Britain’s first cookery books aimed at the domestic reader, Modern Cookery for Private Families. The book introduced the now-universal practice of listing ingredients and giving suggested cooking times for each recipe. It included the first recipes in English for Brussels sprouts and for spaghetti. It also contains the first recipe for what Acton called “Christmas pudding”; the dish was normally called plum pudding, recipes for which had appeared previously, although Acton was the first to put the name and recipe together.

      Acton was born in 1799 in Sussex. She was raised in Suffolk where she ran a girls’ boarding school before spending time in France. On her return to England in 1826 she published a collection of poetry and released her cookery book in 1845, aimed at middle class families. Written in an engaging prose, the book was well received by reviewers. It was reprinted within the year and several editions followed until 1918, when Longman, the book’s publisher, took the decision not to reprint. In 1857 Acton published The English Bread-Book for Domestic Use, a more academic and studious work than Modern Cookery. The work consisted of a history of bread-making in England, a study of European methods of baking and numerous recipes.

      In the later years of its publication, Modern Cookery was eclipsed by the success of Isabella Beeton’s bestselling Mrs Beeton’s Book of Household Management(1861), which included several recipes plagiarised from Acton’s work. [Isabella Beeton’s biographer Kathryn Hughes gives as examples one third of Beeton’s soup dishes and a quarter of her fish recipes, which are all taken from Acton.]

      Although Modern Cookery was not reprinted in full until 1994, the book has been admired by English cooks in the second part of the 20th century, and influenced many of them, including Elizabeth David, Jane Grigson, Delia Smith, and Rick Stein.

      There is humour in Acton’s work, particularly when reporting on a recipe going wrong. Her recipe for Publisher’s Pudding, which contains cognac, macaroons, cream and almonds, “can scarcely be made too rich”, while the Poor Author’s Pudding is made with milk, bread, eggs and sugar, and is a more simple dish. Similarly, in her recipe for Superior Pine-Apple Marmalade, she writes that if the mixture is placed onto a direct heat it “will often convert what would otherwise be excellent preserve, into a strange sort of compound, for which it is difficult to find a name”.

      Acton, who suffered from poor health for much of her life, died at home on 13 February 1859, at the age of 59.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliza_Acton

    2. Kevin Rudd historic apology is bafflingly celebrated in some quarters but the reality for many Aboriginals is dire.

      Personally I loathe these performative apologies as they change absolutely nothing except for the apologiser who now thinks he/she is a paragon of virtue.

      Rant over 🤔. Apologies to those who think these things are important.

  6. It’s also a dodge that the headline attribution is to “Gazan Officials,” whoever they are (probably Hamas).

  7. Just a heads up that the American College of Pediatricians is a right wing gaggle that pretty much opposes positions of the broader mainstream American Academy of Peds. H/t for parsing this to my very knowledgeable, retired RN wife!

    1. The name clicked with me. I can’t remember though: are the the anti-vax maniacs?
      There’s an org out there with a very official medical name that smuggles some really deranged stuff. Is it them?

      That said, I’m utterly against the “Affirmation” model personally.
      I see it as a HUGE misstep along the lines of FGM or lobotomy.

      See the recent, Colorado, conference genspect https://genspect.org/
      for more.
      D.A.
      NYC

      1. My wife says yes; they are anti vax, anti LQGBT….etc. the academy is the historically legit organization.

  8. Re cats with OCD, our late cat Marcus Clawrelius was scrupulous about walking on the stepping stones across the lawn.

    1. Glad to see we have the Official Monster Raving Loony Party still campaigning. UK by-elections wouldn’t be the same without them.

      1. Agreed! Screaming Lord Sutch’s political legacy is almost up their with his musical one:

        He holds the record for contesting the most Parliamentary elections: 39 between 1963-97. As a singer, he variously worked with Keith Moon, Jeff Beck, Jimmy Page, Ritchie Blackmore, Charlie Watts, John Bonham, Noel Redding, Mitch Mitchell and Nicky Hopkins…

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screaming_Lord_Sutch

  9. The medical society that congregates the pediatricians in the US is the American Academy of Pediatrics.
    The American College of Pediatricians is a right-wing organization that has already been accused of misusing or mischaracterizing scientific papers to foster its own agenda.
    I would read those papers carefully to be sure they really say what the American College of Pediatricians says they say.

    1. I have read them and they do. The ACP’s statement is a fair representation of the direction European countries are moving in response to the evidence. Nowhere but in the United States and Canada is this controversial or even news.

      1. I read some, not all. Their reference number 8 is a paper funded by a Christian advocacy group and published on the journal of the Catholic Medical Association. I wonder why they couldn’t get it published in a mainstream medical journal. Reference 43 is a report by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. This report is severely biased, and ignored many relevant studies (more on that on https://medicine.yale.edu/lgbtqi/research/gender-affirming-care/florida%20report%20final%20july%208%202022%20accessible_443048_284_55174_v3.pdf).
        Reference 57 refers to the Swedish guidelines for care of children with gender dysphoria. The web page of the ACP says that the Swedish report concluded that the risk of hormonal interventions for gender dysphoric youth outweigh the potential benefits. I could not find that conclusion in the report. What I found was that “puberty-suppressing treatment can in some cases be considered to be of great benefit”.
        It seems that the ACP is very selective, to say the least, of the evidence they choose to present. They have an agenda and make a great effort to push it.

        1. I’ve read McNamara et al., which you provided. Thanks.

          I’ll stick to their positive review of Tordoff et al. (2022)* because it has been widely cited and is interesting intellectually. This study was represented as a comparison of GAC vs. no GAC in disturbed teenagers referred to a gender clinic. (GAC = gender-affirming care, i.e., puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones.) But it wasn’t. It was all one cohort, the members of which started GAC at the discretion of the treating doctors (not the researchers) at various times after enrolling. Some started immediately (seven had actually started before the first clinic visit), others started after a period of observation of 3 to 12 months, some never started. About a third dropped out during the study and their outcomes are unknown. A handful remained in the study at the end of the year but had never been judged fit to start on GAC. (That is worth noting: not everyone got GAC on demand.)

          The authors found there was no improvement with time in measures of mental health (including suicidal thinking) in the patients who took GAC. With no longitudinal improvement in mental health seen in the treated patients during follow-up to a year, the authors then compared the average (and unchanged) mental health of that group with the mental health of the ever-shrinking group who never became fit to start it. This group had, on average, worsening mental health measures than the group who had been deemed fit to start GAC. The authors claimed this as evidence for benefit of GAC. But this is just a reverse survivor effect. They compared a group who never became mentally fit enough to get GAC with a group who did. The unfit group became enriched for unfitness as its healthier members “graduated” and crossed over to the GAC group, leaving the recalcitrant cases behind. Whatever the clinic was doing, it was helping some patients (not all) improve mentally enough to start GAC, but this improvement all occurred before the puberty blockers or hormones started.

          We also don’t know why so many patients dropped out. Perhaps they had improved enough, with or without GAC, that they didn’t need the services of a gender clinic anymore. But heavy loss to follow-up is a severe threat to the interpretability of a study.

          This is not to take issue with the over-all thrust of McNamara et al. It’s just to point out that there is more to many studies than meets the eye.
          ——————–
          * https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2789423

    1. UTI in men who’ve just had prostate surgery is not “just” the trivial nuisance that most women think of when they hear “bladder infection.”

      I have no idea what’s wrong with Secretary Austen. All I know is I definitely do not want to get prostate cancer. (Although if I live long enough I probably will.)

    2. (Leslie beat me to it).
      Yes, but it’s likely more than “just” UTI. There are many possible issues in the aftermath of his first procedure (I would guess a “radical” prostatectomy, via robotic laparoscopy, a complex procedure with many potential complications.) If he had infection but was unable to void, he’s at risk for sepsis (perhaps his prior issue?). If he still had indwelling catheter (mine was in for 9 unpleasant days post-op, and I had to demonstrate that I could empty my bladder before it was removed),or had it replaced due to inability to void, that adds risk for infection. The prostatic urethra has to be removed initially, and the free ends re-joined. If there’s leakage of infected urine into the surgical bed (where there would be old blood and fluid), that could cause major infection. Etc., etc.
      I won’t go into longer term issues. Many men choose to go with Radiation Therapy as primary treatment (depends on multiple factors), as outcomes through ~10 yrs are similar (or so I was told 10 yrs ago), and that’s way less traumatic. Not sure about longer. I was only 62 at diagnosis, so was thinking in terms of 30 years outcome, my tolerance for surgery at that time, and various other considerations.

  10. Just about all of the major news outlets I read reported the Israeli hostage rescue but felt compelled to offset it by telling us how many Palestinians were killed in the process. Only one country is held to such a standard and, of course, it’s quite likely that many of those killed in the process were terrorists.

    Israel needs to liberate Rafah in order to eliminate Hamas and win the war.

  11. From the news last night: Trump (if elected) will support Putin if NATO doesn’t
    pay up. Sounds like a flimsy excuse to me. He’ll probably send weapons to his
    Kremlin buddy asap. Europe (especially in the east) should start preparing for
    another war. Poland’s next.

    1. Yeah, I heard about that. Trump shows again what a dangerous idiot he is and doesn’t understand that NATO is paid for by 2% of a country’s GDP. Some countries don’t have much GDP and so it appears some aren’t “paying up.” Either way, it shows us again that he is Putin’s puppet. It seems many on the right are not in denial anymore about Trump being Putin’s lapdog- now they just think that it’s a good thing.

      1. Several NATO members for many years did not meet that commitment to fund their armed forces at (or above) 2% of their GDP.

        It’s not the sum paid, it’s that they were failing to meet their treaty obligations.

        (Also, that 2% is for their own armed forces. It doesn’t pay for NATO.)

  12. The Kelsey/Swift relationship makes me laugh in regards to all the right-wing conspiracy theories that have sprung up- mostly about the relationship being a plot to tip the presidential election in Biden’s favor. “The SB was rigged by her and the left” “she’s being used as a Pentagon psy-op” “She was going to endorse Biden by wearing a t-shirt” “the couple is artificially culturally propped-up for a major presidential endorsement”…blah, blah, blah. Trump’s been bashing her as well, which I doubt is a smart thing for him to do…as if he’s a smart politician.

    Another right winger said “the left has Taylor Swift, but we have Kid Rock, Ted Nugent and John Voight!” 🤣🤣🤣

    I did an edit and it turned my laughing emojis into gobbledygook. Interesting. 🤣🤣🤣 I tried again to see…

    Yep, emojis get turned into code via the edit function.

  13. Apropos the furore over the appalling comments by the (now disowned) Labour Party candidate in the Rochdale by-election, it’s worth remembering that whoever wins on Thursday will only be the MP for a matter of months, possibly only for weeks, as a general election is going to be called some time this year. It’s to be hoped that the Labour Party will do a better job of screening their next candidate more thoroughly for anti-Semitic opinions.

Comments are closed.