Valentine #5

February 14, 2014 • 3:18 pm

Finally, we have one from today’s Guardian compilation of science-themed valentines (there are more, but some of them aren’t compelling):

Guardian

Of course, even this one goes wrong, for you’d be forever separated from your beloved.

Have a nice weekend, hopefully with your inamorata or inamorato. And here’s Dino to put you in the mood (from the 1955 movie “Artists and Models”):

Photograph: stock.xchng

15 thoughts on “Valentine #5

        1. Location highly indeterminate. Therefore momentum low, implying low velocity for a fixed rest mass.
          Sounds like Werner’s cat to me. QED.

  1. “Of course, even this one goes wrong, for you’d be forever separated from your beloved.”

    If you take one aspect of love to be the concern for the other: then for sure your seperation from the beloved is the sacrifice you have to make to keep the other safe.
    Then again – Schroedinger was a meany..

    1. Schrödinger got a bad rap. His own words opening his presentation of the thought experiment were, “One can even set up quite ridiculous cases.” The whole thing is quite snarky, indeed; it’s a reducto al absudurdum with the strong implication that you’ve got to be bonkers to think that this his how it would actually play out.

      b&

  2. The “I didn’t cheat on you…” one is a quite amusing addition to the stock of lame excuses for infidelity.

  3. The real Schrödinger would have opened the box right away in a panic because he knew the cat would already be alive or dead inside (and wonder who the hell took his absurd paradox example literally)!

    Someone should wire up a small pill of radium to a food dispenser and see if they can get a cat that’s both fed and not-fed at the same time.

Comments are closed.