By Kraus et al. in the latest Nature. This can’t be unwitting, can it?
A hot compact dust disk around a massive young stellar object
By Kraus et al. in the latest Nature. This can’t be unwitting, can it?
A hot compact dust disk around a massive young stellar object
Comments are closed.
I don’t know. These are normal terms in this branch of science, and all the authors appear to be non-native English speakers.
Let’s see if you get the point of this story: AFTER a conference, the sysadmin noticed that the number of hits to the conference web pages increased dramatically. He asked the conference oraniser if he had changed anything. No, nothing, except he had put up a new page about the proceedings. Title: Submission in LaTeX.
“Submission in LaTeX” …that’s a good one!
What makes you think it is salacious?
somebody needs a shrink quick
Ah, another innuendo “shrink quick” unless you meant “shrink, quick” 😉
exactly dear olnewengland… it is not the same…i was gonna write the whole word…im not sure how anybody reacts these days…. thank you for bring it up. notable
On the other hand, considering that some of the authors are probably native speakers of French, if they had managed to get “black hole” into the title, then we might suspect an, errm, in-joke.
…hot material around a high-mass … young stellar object
The image shows an elongated structure…
…we observed a molecular outflow and two bow shocks, indicating that a bipolar outflow emanates from the inner regions…
A man goes to the psychiatrist. The psychiatrist draws a vertical line. “That’s a naked woman standing up.” A horizontal line. “That’s a naked woman lying down.” Three lines joined at right angles. “That’s a naked woman sitting down.” Psychiatrist: “I think you have some serious hangups concerning sexuality.” Patient: “Me? YOU’RE the one drawing all these pictures of naked women!”
How about this abstract?
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ic0352250
the brazilians…. are master chemistry benders
Freud was a hack; but is it freudian if I read that as “intrusion complex” instead of inclusion complex?
Maybe I need that vacation anyway…
Unfortunately it’s on pay per view – and they want $32 to read about the elongated structure, detailed physical models, two bow shocks and bipolar outflow emanating from the inner regions of the system
Click here for free science porn
I think it is much easier to access science free porno…
Um, I didn’t react at all to that.
But then the science is exciting! First, that stars more than 10 solar masses forms the same and have the same protoplanetary disk (so we will understand stellar formation; have more exoplanets). Second, that yet again the disk/star mass ratio is ~ 1.
explanets? arent all planets exo?
Unfortunately, these are mundane terms in astronomy.
And a double entendre wouldn’t be “double” without the mundane half co complement the salacious half.
Especially incriminating is the surname of the ultimate author:
Leonardo Testi
I think it was probably unintentional, but it made me laugh, too.