An amazing 3D illusion

November 20, 2015 • 2:30 pm

We’ll finish off the week with a topic beloved of Matthew Cobb: optical illusions.

A German artist named Stefan Pabst specializes in doing drawings that look amazingly three-dimensional, as well as speed drawings (his YouTube site is here; be sure to check out the 3D Eiffel Tower, just put up to honor the victims of Paris). And check out his tarantula, too: stunning!

Here’s Pabst’s amazing drawing of a glass of water. I have a vague feeling that I may have posted this before; sue me if I have:

h/t: Ant

 

Do animals see optical illusions?

February 22, 2015 • 2:00 pm

This gif strongly suggests that at least cats do:

uE9ihTO

This page will show you a larger version of the “wheel” illusion that the cat is inspecting (and attacking). I think it’s very clever to present such images to animals who can show us directly (as hunting cats can) whether their senses are fooled. This moggie was clearly duped!

That’s not all that surprising, of course, as we naturally think that other mammals’ eyes work the same way as ours. But this shows more than that—it shows that other mammals’ brains work the same way as ours (at least insofar as the illusion works), for what is taken in by the eye is interpreted by the brain. This cat sees a nonmoving image and, like us, interprets it as being in motion.

Optical illusions are a byproduct of the evolved interaction between vision and its neural interpretation, and many such illusions—like the “checker-shadow” illusion, perhaps the best of all optical illusions— reflect our evolved ability to compensate for natural phenomena. Greg Mayer has written about how countershading in animals takes advantage of predator’s evolved tendency to be fooled about the hue of an object. Likewise the checker-shadow illusion fools us because our brains evolved to imagine things in shadow to be lighter than they really are.

Of course many of the selective pressures that molded our own interpretation of what we see must be similar in animals. Predators and humans are both fooled by countershading, and I bet a mammalian predator’s brain would also be fooled by the checkershadow illusion. (Actually, that could be tested, at least in birds, by training them to peck at squares of a certain hue and then giving them the illusion.) Or perhaps we’ve simply inherited the eye-brain connection that is fooled by illusions from our ancestors in which that visual interpretation was critical for survival, and we’re the victims of “evolutionary inertia.” Regardless, the cat above shows that we’re not the only species fooled by these two-dimensional tricks.

h/t: John S.

Another bizarre illusion

September 8, 2014 • 2:23 pm

I just realized that Matthew must have a thing about fooling vision, for he not only sends us many cases of crypsis (e.g., “spot the nightjar”), but optical illusions as well.

Here’s a good one he sent as a tw**t from Kyle Hill:

Screen Shot 2014-09-08 at 4.18.40 PM

Yes, the lines are abstolutely straight; you can check that out with a ruler or a piece of paper. Now why do they look curved?

Bw45DixCAAAE_dj

Why do the dots disappear?

September 2, 2014 • 8:10 am
This is one of the most baffling illusions I’ve ever seen. Take a look at the gif below.  First, look at any yellow dot as the figure moves. The yellow dot remains present and stationary. If you concentrate on all three yellow dots, they remain there as well.
But now concentrate on the central green dot. You will see one or more of the yellow dots disappearing and then reappearing sporadically. They are not—this is an optical illusion. The dots remain and your brain simply doesn’t register their presence from time to time. Weird, eh?

anigif_enhanced-16656-1408614979-1

An article by John Whitfield in Nature News, “A brain in doubt leaves it out,” explains the phenomenon:

Yoram Bonneh, of the Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute in San Francisco, and colleagues have been showing people a swirling pattern of blue dots superimposed on some stationary yellow dots1. [JAC: for some reason the reference isn’t given.]

The yellow dots seem to wink in and out. But the erasing happens in the mind, not the computer. Nearly everyone tested saw the effect.

The brain seems to have internal theories about what the world is like. It then uses sensory input – which tends to be patchy and disorganized – to choose between these. In some sensory situations, different theories come into conflict, sending our perceptions awry.

The illusion, which Bonneh’s team calls motion-induced blindness, catches the brain ignoring or discarding information. This may be one of the brain’s useful tricks, a deficiency – or perhaps both, says Bonneh.

The researchers suggest this may (and I suggest that it certainly must) happen in daily life:

The researchers speculate that this phenomenon could happen in everyday life without us noticing it. A highway at night, with drivers staring dully at a mass of moving lights, might recreate the kind of conditions used in the experiments, says Bonneh, causing objects – the tail lamp of the car in the next lane, for example – to temporarily vanish.

Jack Pettigrew, a neuroscientist at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, believes that the illusion results from a tussle for supremacy between the left and right halves of the brain.

He has found that applying a pulse of magnetism to the brain to temporarily disrupt its function affects the occurrence of motion-induced blindness. When the pulse is applied to the right hemisphere (leaving the left dominant) the dots disappear; zapping the left brings them back2.

The left hemisphere seems to suppress sensory information that conflicts with its idea of what the world should be like; the right sees the world how it really is. Some people with paralysis caused by injuries to their right hemisphere will deny that they are disabled.

My only question is why it takes motion to generate this illusion. Is that because motion is associated with visual confusion?

Source of gif: Professor Michael Bach at the University of Freiburg, via reader Grania. Bach has a page with 113 of these damn things!