As I wrote on February 13, three important societies representing evolutionary biology, ecology, and systematics issued a grossly misleading statement aimed at the government. (It is dated February 5, but I don’t think it’s yet been sent):
As I reported recently, the Presidents of three organismal-biology societies, the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE), the American Society of Naturalists (ASN) and the Society of Systematic Biologists (SSB) sent a declaration addressed to President Trump and all the members of Congress. (declaration archived here) Implicitly claiming that its sentiments were endorsed by the 3500 members of the societies, the declaration also declared that there is a scientific consensus on the definition of sex, and the consensus is that sex is not binary but rather some unspecified but multivariate combination of different traits, a definition that makes sex a continuum or spectrum—and in all species! The bolding below is Jerry’s:
Scientific consensus defines sex in humans as a biological construct that relies on a combination of chromosomes, hormonal balances, and the resulting expression of gonads, external genitalia and secondary sex characteristics. There is variation in all these biological attributes that make up sex. Accordingly, sex (and gendered expression) is not a binary trait. While some aspects of sex are bimodal, variation along the continuum of male to female is well documented in humans through hundreds of scientific articles. Such variation is observed at both the genetic level and at the individual level (including hormone levels, secondary sexual characteristics, as well as genital morphology). Beyond the incorrect claim that science backs up a simple binary definition of sex, the lived experience of people clearly demonstrates that the genetic composition at conception does not define one’s identity. Rather, sex and gender result from the interplay of genetics and environment. Such diversity is a hallmark of biological species, including humans.
And as I write this today, I am still baffled how the different traits are supposed to be combined to determine one’s sex. I’d also like to ask the three societies exactly how many human sexes there are. As I’ve said before, I’m embarrassed to have been associated with the SSE since it’s now rejecting science in favor of currying favor with “progressive” ideology. It’s okay for societies to respond to situations that fall within their ambit, as this case does, but it’s not okay for them to purvey bogus science to buttress a political position.
Our original letter included 23 signers, most of whom are included in this second and final version of the letter. The first letter never received a response (I find that rather rude), but we’re hoping for a response to this one.
The list of signers has now grown to 125, whose names are placed below the fold to keep this post shorter. If we’ve counted correctly, the signers come from nineteen countries. (We have omitted the names of five medical doctors and a nurse who also signed.) Every signer was willing to make their names public—a condition for signing the group letter. Others I know of have written privately to the Presidents of the Societies—and received a response, so the Societies clearly didn’t think they had to respond to our first letter.
The point of this letter is not to show that our view is a “consensus” (the Societies did not poll their members, either), but simply to affirm that a variety of people in biology or adjacent areas reject the Societies’ construal of sex as both a “construct” and a “spectrum”. The letter below speaks for itself.
By the way, the driving force for writing the letter and collecting the signatures was Luana Maroja, Professor of Biology at Williams College, so kudos to her. And below this line is our letter, which was sent to the societies four minutes before this posting.
Dear presidents of the Tri-societies: ASN, SSB and SSE,
We, Tri-society members and/or biologists, are deeply disappointed by your recent letter “Letter to the US President and Congress on the Scientific Understanding of Sex and Gender” issued last Wednesday, Feb 5, 2025, in response to Trump’s executive order “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism And Restoring Biological Truth To The Federal Government”.
While we agree that Trump’s executive orders are misleading, we disagree with your statements about the sex binary and its definition. In animals and plants, binary sex is universally defined by gamete type, even though sexes vary in how they are developmentally determined and phenotypically identified across taxa. Thus, your letter misrepresents the scientific understanding of many members of the Tri-societies.
You state that: “Scientific consensus defines sex in humans as a biological construct that relies on a combination of chromosomes, hormonal balances, and the resulting expression of gonads, external genitalia, and secondary sex characteristics.”
However, we do not see sex as a “construct” and we do not see other mentioned human-specific characteristics, such as “lived experiences” or “[phenotypic] variation along the continuum of male to female”, as having anything to do with the biological definition of sex. While we humans might be unique in having gender identities and certain types of sexual dimorphism, sex applies to us just as it applies to dragonflies, butterflies, or fish – there is no human exceptionalism. Yes, there are developmental pathologies that cause sterility and there are variations in phenotypic traits related to sexual dimorphism. However, the existence of this variation does not make sex any less binary or more complex, because what defines sex is not a combination of chromosomes or hormonal balances or external genitalia and secondary sex characteristics. The universal biological definition of sex is gamete size.
If you and the signers of this letter do not agree on these points, then the Tri-societies were wrong to speak in our names and claim that there is a scientific consensus without even conducting a survey of society members to see if such a consensus exists. Distorting reality to comply with ideology and using a misleading claim of consensus to give a veneer of scientific authority to your statement does more harm than just misrepresenting our views: it also weakens public trust in science, which has declined rapidly in the last few years. Because of this, scientific societies should stay away from politics as much as possible, except for political issues that directly affect the mission of the society.
Respectfully,
NAMES OF 125 SIGNERS ARE BELOW THE FOLD
[Click “continue reading” to see the names.]
In alphabetical order:
Charleen Adams, Lead Statistical Geneticist, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Eli Vieira Araujo-Jnr, biologist and independent journalist, Brazil
John Avise, Emeritus Professor, Univ, of California, Irvine
Nick Bailey, Research Fellow in Bioinformatics
Daniel A. Barbash, Professor, Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University
Alexander T. Baugh, Associate Professor, Department of Biology, Swarthmore College
David Bertioli, Distinguished Investigator and Professor, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, USA
Andreas Bikfalvi, Professor MD PhD, University of Bordeaux, France
Franco Biondi, Professor of Natural Resources and Environmental Science
Ranieri Bizzarri, Professor of Biochemistry, University of Pisa, Italy
William J. Boecklen, Professor, Department of Biology, New Mexico State University
Jacobus (Koos) Boomsma, Emeritus Professor, University of Copenhagen Department of Biology
Glenn Borchardt, Director, Progressive Science Institute
Gary Bowering, Member, Royal Society of New Zealand
Gordon M. Burghardt, Professor of Psychology and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology (Emeritus), University of Tennessee
Chris Campbell, Research Assistant Professor (retired)/ University at Buffalo
Joseph Ciccolini, Professor/University Hospital of Marseille France
Kendall Clements, Professor, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland
Mark Collard, Chair in Human Evolutionary Studies, Simon Fraser University
Michael Coon, Scientist/Biopharma (cell therapy)
Athel Cornish-Bowden, Directeur de Recherche Émérite au CNRS (retired)
Richard Cowling, Emeritus Professor of Botany, Nelson Mandela University
Jerry Coyne, Professor Emeritus, Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago
David Curtis, Honorary Professor, Genetics Institute, University College London, UK
Richard Dawkins, Emeritus Professor, University of Oxford
Robert O. Deaner, Professor, Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University; PhD Biological Anthropology & Anatomy, Duke University
Gilly Denham, SSE member, Williams College
Lynn Devenport, Professor Emeritus of Psychology, University of Oklahoma
Chet Dickson, Secondary Education (retired)
Paul Doerder, Professor Emeritus Cleveland State University
Gavin Douglas, Postdoctoral Researcher, North Carolina State University
Janet Roman Dreyer, Retired PhD Research Fellow Caltech
Joan Edwards, Samuel Fessenden Clarke Professor of Biology, Williams College
Nelson Jurandi Rosa Fagundes, Associate Professor, Department of Genetics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Lars Figenschou, PhD. The Arctic University of Norway
David Frayer, Prof. Emeritus – Anthropology, University of Kansas
Steven M. Fredman, Associate Professor of Physiology & Neuroscience (retired)
Jonathan Gallant, Professor Emeritus of Genome Sciences, University of Washington
Constantino Macías Garcia, Full-time researcher (professor), Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
Brian Gill, retired natural history curator from Auckland Museum, New Zealand
David Greene, Professor, California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt
Christy Hammer, Associate Professor of Education, Sociology, and Women and Gender Studies, University of Southern Maine
Brian Hanley, Biologist, PhD. UC Davis
Sheila Rutledge Harding, Professor (ret’d), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan
Michael Hart, Professor, Simon Fraser University
Wesley Hawthornthwaite, BSc Neuroscience and Mental Health, Carleton University
James Heard, MS Biology, San Francisco State, SF, California, Retired
Jody Hey, Professor, Temple University
Emma Hilton, Developmental Biology, University of Manchester, U.K.
Susan Hoffman, Associate Professor of Biology, Miami University and 40 year member of SSE
Carole Kennedy Hooven, Senior Fellow, AEI; Affiliate, Harvard Psychology.
David Hughes, Teaching Fellow in Marine Biology (retired), Scottish Association for Marine Science
Peter M. Hurley, PHD Widlife Biologist, currently GIS Analyst, Grant County, NM
Christine Janis, Professor Emerita, Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Brown University
Maria Garza Jinich, Retired CS professor. National University of Mexico.
Brian Jones, Retired Principal Fish Pathologist, Government of Western Australia
Robert King, Dr, University College Cork, Ireland
Anatoly Kolomeisky, Professor of Chemistry, Rice University
Shawn R. Kuchta, Professor, Biological Sciences, Ohio University
Michael Lattorff, Associate Professor (Parasitology) / University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Life Sciences, Durban, South Africa
Benoît Leblanc, Lecturer, Sherbrooke University
Edward Lee, SSE member, Williams College
Harry Lusic, Associate Professor of Chemistry, William Peace University
Dan Lynch, Professor of Biology, Emeritus, Williams College
Maya Dyankova Markova, Associate Professor of Biology at the Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria
Luana S. Maroja, Professor of Biology, Williams College
Edward Matalka, SSE member, Adjunct Professor of Biology, Worcester State University
Nicholas J. Matzke, Senior Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland
Gregory C. Mayer, Professor of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Parkside
Stephanie Mayer, Senior Instructor Emerita, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder
Marcella McClure, Microbiology retired from Montana State University
Richard J. McNally, Professor of Psychology, Harvard University
Axel Meyer, Lehrstuhl für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, University of Konstanz
William Meyer, Educator, General Science, Mokena Junior High School, Illinois
Neil Millar, Biology textbook author and retired biology teacher
Michael Mills, Associate Professor of Psychology, Loyola Marymount University
Graeme Minto, Biologist, Πανεπεστιμιο Κριτις
Robert Montgomerie, Professor Emeritus of Biology Queen’s University
Greg Murray, Professor Emeritus of Biology, Hope College
Paulo Nadanovsky, Professor of Epidemiology, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Raymond Nelson, Biology Educator/North Thurston Public Schools
Howard S. Neufeld, Professor of Biology, Appalachian State University
Judith Totman Parrish, Professor and Dean Emerita/University of Idaho
Laurent Penet, PI in Agricultural Science, INRAe, Guadeloupe
Charles C. Peterson, Ph.D., Retired biologist Copper Mountain College
Steven Pinker, Johnstone Family Professor of Psychology, Harvard University
David Policansky, PhD, Scholar, US National Research Council, retired.
Chris Pook, Senior Research Fellow; Lead Technologist, The Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland
Anthony M. Poole, Professor, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland
Jorge Octavio Juarez Ramirez, PhD Candidate (Biological Sciences, Evolution and Genetics)/Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Mary Rasmussen, Professor Emerita, Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago
Michel Raymond, Evolutionary Anthropology, Institute of Evolutionary Studies, Montpellier, France
Jaime Renart, Retired researcher, molecular and cellular biology, CSIC. Spain
Jacques Robert, Emeritus professor of cancer biology, University of Bordeaux, France
Mel Robertson, Professor Emeritus of Biology, Queen’s University at Kingston, ON, Canada
Rafael L. Rodriguez, Professor, Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
James J. Roper, Professor (retired), ecology, evolution, ornithology, Institute for Tropical Ecology, Panama
Callum Ross, Professor of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago
Claudio Rubiliani, Docteur d’Etat. Honorary MCF Biologie des Organismes. Univ. Aix-Marseille (France)Visiting Professor Duke
Bjørn Ove Sætre, Developmental biology University of Bergen, Norway retired teacher
Lisa Sanders, Ph.D., Genetics, North Carolina State University
David Scadden, Professor, Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology and of Medicine, Harvard University
Julia Schaletzky, Professor of Molecular Therapeutics (Adj.), Dept. of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley
Brandon Schmit, Wildlife Disease Biologist, USDA
Corrie Schoeman, Associate Professor, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal
Garvin Schulz, Dr., Department of Sociobiology/Anthropology, University of Göttingen
Elizabeth Sherman, Professor of Biology, Emerita, Bennington College
David Smith, Emeritus, Department of Biology, Williams College
Flavio S.J, de Souza, Group leader in Developmental Biology, IFIBYNE-CONICET, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Robert Paul Spence, Biotechnology company Chief Scientist
Steve Stewart-Williams, Professor of Psychology, University of Nottingham Malaysia
Malcolm Storey, PhD, naturalist retired
Mark Sturtevant, Associate Professor of Practice, Biological Sciences, Oakland University
John P. Sullivan, SSB member, PhD in Zoology, Duke University
Douglas Swartzendruber, Professor Emeritus, Biology, University of Colorado
Costas A. Thanos, Prof. Emer., Dept Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
Keith M. Vogelsang, Professor of Biology, Ivy Tech Community College
Schulte von Drach, Biologist (PhD). Journalist
Graham Wallis, Emeritus Professor, Population genetics and molecular evolution, University of Otago
Philip Ward, Professor Entomology, University of California Davis
Bob Warneke, Jr., BA (’73) and MS (’76) – Biology; Trinity University
Randy Wayne, Associate professor of plant biology, Cornell University
Marcelo Weksler, Professor, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Landon Whitby, Chemical Biologist, PhD, The Scripps Research Institute
Mike Zenanko, Director Emeritus, Jacksonville State University
I hope it has an impact. I have my doubts.
All we can do is try. Thanks for your encouragement.
Kudos and a round of applause to all the organizers and signers. Somebody has to stand up to the nonsense and high status people putting social skin in the game make a difference.
D.A.
NYC
Glad to read it.
I’ve said it before I’ll say it again :
“Gender performativity” (Judith Butler, 1990) is the Gnostic and Hermetic cult religious belief that epistemically competes with and targets sex for subversion. Its object is transformation of human beings – on an evolutionary scale, to reproduce “gender performativity”. There is every reason to compete against it.
Well done. Had I been a current or emeritus biologist (paleontologist), I would have signed.
+1
If you’re a paleontologist I assume that’s close enough. There are evidently psychologists on the list.
Very good. I don’t know what impact this will have, but at least many have spoken.
Excellent letter. Facts about evolution and biology shouldn’t be compromised just to be nice to people who don’t like the reality of their bodies.
We can support these people without muddying the definition of science.
+1. I would try to get Colin Wright’s name on the list. Of course, I don’t speak for him. However, I think he would agree with all of points. I don’t know if he is a member of any of the societies in question.
These societies have skipped over reality to the realm of wishful thinking, a cultural ideological misstep.
There is one word I would have been tempted to use.
We “emphatically” disagree… there is no room here for being nice on the behalf of science. All human rights are preserved with no intention to harm just clarity and error correction.
The fact that the binary system of sex is simply immovable decided not by humans but by natural selection and we don’t GET to decide anymore than deciding how deep the oceans are.
Dear Dr. Coyne,
I was surprised to see that you have removed the signatures of physicians from the above letter. We pediatricians perform thousands of newborn examinations, giving us the opportunity to observe the variation in genitalia. We follow these children through childhood and adolescence, providing firsthand experience with the variation in secondary sex characteristics, behavior and personalities. We occasionally see a rare disorder of sexual development. Yet, we observe that all of these children are boys or girls and grow up to become men or women – even many with disorders of sexual development. So I find it a mystery why you seem to think that a physician with extensive experience with actual human beings is somehow less qualified to render an opinion on human sexuality than someone who has only worked in a laboratory with fruit flies or mice.
Respectfully,
Stephen P. Sanders, MD
Dr. Sanders’ comment makes good sense. I assume that the drafters of the letter
appreciate that pediatricians are well qualified to render judgements on human sexuality. My guess is that the drafters left out signatures of medical professionals because the letter pertained to institutions of academic Biology—namely the dopey while seemingly official pronouncements by presidents of three academic societies.
Maybe a parallel public statement rejecting “sex spectrum” hogwash by a legion of medical professionals would be a good idea.
Ouch. Right as rain you are, though.
That will be a while coming, alas.
Dear Colleagues,
As an evolutionary biologist with a focus on “sex & gender in animals-plants” I very much appreciate this important discussion– here is an Article wherein the definitions of sex and gender are given
http://www.hirudinea-lamarck1818.com/media/files/-2016–Kutschera_Journal-of-Marine-Sci-Res-Dev-2016_6_5_1000210_Sex-versus-Gender-in-Sea-Urchins-and-Leeches-Two-Centuries-after-Lamarck-1816.pdf
— Best regards, Ulrich Kutschera, Pofessor of Biology, http://www.evolutionsbiologen.de
Thank you for the reference!
jac
Can people still add their names to the letter?