Bari Weiss interviews Roland Fryer

February 21, 2024 • 12:45 pm

A lot of readers and heterodox colleagues have sent me this link to Bari Weiss’s interview with Harvard economics professor Roland G. Fryer, Jr., often accompanied by big encomiums. Despite my unwillingness to watch long videos, I did watch all 77 minutes of it.  Unfortunately, I wasn’t mesmerized, or even much interested. There are interesting bits in it, but I can’t wholeheartedly recommend it. Readers who see it, or have seen it and feel otherwise, please weigh in below.

Fryer is famous for two things: his prize-winning economic and sociological work, which sometimes produced counterintuitive results, and also for his suspension from Harvard for two years for sexual harassment. (He’s now back again.) I have only a few comments, but here’s the intro from the Free Press on YouTube:

Roland Fryer is one of the most celebrated economists in the world. He is the author of more than 50 papers—on topics ranging from “the economic consequences of distinctively black names” to “racial differences in police shootings.” At 30, he became the youngest black tenured professor in Harvard’s history. At 34, he won a MacArthur Genius Fellowship, followed by a John Bates Clark Medal, which is given to an economist in America under 40 who is judged to have made the most significant contribution to economic thought and knowledge.

But before coming to Harvard, Fryer worked at McDonalds—drive-through, not corporate.

Fryer’s life story of rapid ascent to academic celebrity status despite abandonment by his parents at a young age, and growing up in what he calls a “drug family” is incredibly inspiring in its own right. Because based on every statistic and stereotype about race and poverty in America, he should not have become the things he became. And yet he did.

He also continues to beat the odds in a world in which much of academia has become conformist. Time and time again, Fryer refuses to conform. He has one north star, and that is the pursuit of truth, come what may. The pursuit of truth no matter how unpopular the conclusion or inconvenience to his own political biases.

He’s also rare in that he isn’t afraid to admit when he’s wrong, or to admit his mistakes and learn from them.

Bari Weiss sat down with Roland at the University of Austin for this inspiring, courageous, and long-overdue conversation.

The parts I found most absorbing are these:

  1. Fryer’s rough upbringing, raised without a mother and with most of his acquaintances being killed. And, of course, working at the McDonald’s drive-though before college.
  2. His famous paper showing that although there is police bias against blacks for some legal infractions, there is no racial bias in the Big Issue: police shootings. Fryer describes how he had to get police protection for over a month after that paper came out, for its conclusion violated the Aceepted Narrative and angered many people.
  3. His suspension from Harvard and closure of his lab. Fryer appears to have taken it well, but does explain that the incident involved his failure to understand “power dynamics”, for which he’s apologized. It’s curious, and has been pointed out by many, that Claudine Gay, who was a dean at the time (and later President of Harvard), was instrumental in getting Fryer punished. This makes Weiss ask Fryer at one point, “do you believe in karma?”  I can’t say much more about this as I haven’t followed the controversy, but I know many people think Fryer’s punishment was unduly harsh.

A Q&A session begins 49 minutes in.

6 thoughts on “Bari Weiss interviews Roland Fryer

  1. I watched this twice when it first aired.

    I recommend it – highly. Hopeful and inspiring.

    Re: Claudine Gay:
    Weiss: “do you believe in karma?”
    Fryer: “I hear it’s a mo-f-ker” 😀

    Why can’t Ronald be Harvard’s new president?

  2. It would have been nice to hear more on the interactions between Roland and Claudine Gay, but since they are both Harvard faculty I can see that that is sensitive. For anyone wanting more background, read here and watch the video there.

    In short, Fryer’s infractions seem to have been minor, and the complaints came from a former employee who was disgruntled for other reasons. The resulting investigation recommended only that he undergo some training, with no further sanction. But then Gay insisted on a wildly disproportionate punlishment, that he be suspended and deprived of any means to do research, and indeed she tried to get him stripped on tenure. And all because he had blasphemed against the holy writ of woke ideology.

    Roland Fry is academic excellence, coming from a deprived background, and he prioritises data, evidence and truth. Claudine Gay is a mediocrity, coming from a privileged background of wealthy parents who sent her to the most expensive schools, who then prioritises “identity” and ideology.

    1. Well, any remaining sympathy I did have for Claudine Gay just evaporated.

      Having said that, she could not have done otherwise. So I need to recalibrate my sympathy probe.

  3. Prof Fryer is great.
    In about 2015 I wondered about the “base rate neglect” the entire BLM movement was founded on – given I’d practiced criminal defense in NYC courts and had an understanding of crime in real life.
    Plus I looked the stats up.

    I immediately was repulsed by the emotional blackmail of the concept of “BLM”, this before news of the rampant corruption, nepotism and criminality of the org itself came to light.
    Also before the Ferguson and then Floyd Effects were known.
    AND… before I saw the engram of the NYTimes/WaPo/LATimes for “racism” etc.

    D.A.
    NYC

  4. A short excerpt was circulating on eXtwitter – I listened to that. The excerpt seemed to announce a fresh voice in the public sphere with some “lived experience” – but not the kind usually meant by “lived experience“.

    Glad to see this development. Time will tell if Fryer’s thought enlightens the public – seems likely.

Comments are closed.