Readers’ wildlife photos

March 1, 2018 • 7:30 am

As I’m home during the early morning, and thus limited to photos that just arrived. Today we have a short but sweet set of two from Stephen Barnard, who’s been AWOL for a while.

First, a House Finch (Haemorhous mexicanus):

And then Deets, one of Stephen’s two Border Collies (the other is Hitch). As he says, the fresh snow “amps them up”. This is an “almost all black dog”, but doesn’t count as such for my purposes.

16 thoughts on “Readers’ wildlife photos

  1. Two magnificent beauties! Thanks, Stephen.

    (We’ll be getting around 15cm of snow later today in SW Ontario. Could feel weird after the balmy 15C of yesterday.)

      1. Yes! Everyone was out, walking and basking in the sunshine, and the playgrounds were all abuzz. But it’s only -2° to 1°C today, so it’s back to parkas and other winter paraphernalia. Boo. I am ready for spring; after all, the starlings are back!

  2. Lovely photos! Allow me to jump in with the obvious observation (and at the risk of being accused of assigning gender roles) that the house finch is the male of the species.

  3. This is the worst time of year for photography or fishing or anything else here. Birds and animals are scarce and the light is usually poor. Occasionally the sun peeks out for a photo, but it’s mostly a waste of time to try. I write this during the most intense snowfall of the winter.

    “Spring beckons! All things to the call respond; the trees are leaving and cashiers abscond.” Ambrose Bierce

    1. Proofreading this after the fact, and helpless to edit it, I’m embarrassed that my mammalian “classism” is revealed — implicitly excluding birds from “animals”. That’s wrong on epistemological, taxonomic, lexical, and ethical grounds. 🙂

      As an occasional amateur photographer of wildlife, I value a quality photo of a mammal, all else equal, higher than a photo of a bird, fish, insect or plant. Pure classism. Maybe an intersectional feminist can explain it.

Comments are closed.