All I know of this short video is what’s in it: the boat is 16 miles offshore. I don’t know the species of the bird (readers?) nor whether it was migrating. But I’m glad it found a head to rest on.
And here’s a video that’s been made into a great tw**t. This is surely a sugar glider (Petaurus breviceps), a marsupial found in Australia and New Guinea.
https://twitter.com/catesish/status/862730600981168128
h/t: Grania
This once happened to me, too. Miles from the Cape Canaveral shoreline, on a catamaran, a sparrow landed on my leg. Time froze for me; I scarcely dared breathe lest I frighten him away. It was a precious occurrence.
Wasn’t that the sugar glider that was crucified and resurrected? Must have been about forty days ago.
Sugar gliders are cutesy, and a bit of a pest too.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-20/lethal-traps-for-sugar-gliders-may-help-save-swift-parrots/6864934
16 miles off where? And when? One thing I can say for sure is that the bird is not a Sugar Glider (a marsupial that doesn’t fly any more than a Flying Squirrel). My guess is that the video was made last August or September in the Atlantic Ocean 16 miles off the East Coast of N. America and that the bird is a young (or female) American Redstart, one of the few birds that has those yellow patches on its tail. Warblers and other neotropical migrants often land on boats in the N. Atlantic especially during fall migration.
I agree. American Redstart.
I think that is a bush baby
Anyway here is an instagram showing it taking off & landing. It should be easy for someone to identify from the landing sequence where we see the very long legs which suggests to me primate bush baby
https://www.instagram.com/p/BT5uiL_Bu9C/
Yes, a tarsier/bush baby. But holy levitation, Batman!
And since news about the Highest Primates is all pretty disgusting at the moment, how about the new H. naledi publications. Tiny brains nearly made it!
Alternative take : pretty much as soon as Homo sapiens evolved, they killed off all the competition pretty damned quick. Not necessarily by direct acts of murder – ecological change kills just as effectively.
But murder/war/genocide/predation speeds up the process. Possibly the naledis were caching their dead in an attempt to put Hsaps on a diet?
Not disputed.
The archaeological record is extremely light on evidence for human cannibalism. There is more evidence for mortuary practices including defleshing – having a “Let’s peel Granny” party – but even that is pretty uncommon. At some point in the spectrum from “looks like Granny, don’t eat” disgust to “piggy looks tasty” people lose their reluctance to kill, butcher and eat, but seeing that where it’s available, chimp meat isn’t a common choice, I doubt that sapiens-on-naledi predation was a major problem. Killing for competition-reduction on the other hand, no bets.
Male-pattern bird-ness?