20 thoughts on “A d*g denies evolution”

  2. Personally, I think that was a fake video and it was posted just to defame dogs.

  3. The obvious thing that a religious d*g would ask is ‘if d*gs evolved from wolves, why are there still wolves?’

    1. And how did the hallmark of doghood evolve, fetching the sti… um, obedience!?

      You can’t answer that one, evolutionists!

  5. I would say dull and uncreative. Much better caricatures on the topic are available.

  6. A bit off topic, but I just have to share this.

    A ‘feminist’ pro-lifer from Secular Pro Life perspectives has this brilliant essay to share, explaining why women *wrongly* enjoy sex:

    https://disqus.com/home/discussion/secularprolifeblog/secular_pro_life_perspectives_buddhist_and_christian_post_abortion_healing_rituals_have_much_in_comm/#comment-2154423418

    Have a look at evolution and tell me who benefits from a sexual appetite?

    Ever wondered why so many women don’t orgasm during sex?

    In ancient times, Females did not benefit from PIV sex. PIV sex often left them pregnant, which made them vulnerable to predators. If they had no mate to protect them, they often died. It was best for their survival if they avoided PIV sex unless they had someone to protect them.

    On the otherhand males could have as much PIV sex as they wanted, they only needed a handful of their dozens of progeny to survive in order for their bloodline to continue.

    then marriage came along, meaning males had to stick around and protect their mates, ensuring both of their bloodlines. This is probably the first feminist act ever created. Probably why its called MATRImony.

    But men still had sexual desires that their biology told them needed to be met.

    What did this mean? Women who give into the sexual desires of men were more likely to have their bloodline survive. And women who liked sex were more likely to give into those desires.

    Fast forward a few thousand years and more women have evolved to like sex just as much as men, even the ones who don’t like it still do it. This is a result of ancient patriarchy.

    And no im not saying its dirty and sinful. Although patriarchy has told us womens natural functions (mensturation and childbirth) are dirty and sinful.

    Women can participate in PIV sex as much as they want, but it has evolved from a male desire, not a female desire

    This has been your lesson in evolution for the day.

    1. “Evolution”. You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

      Also “matrimony”:

      “matrimony (n.)

      c. 1300, from Old French matremoine “matrimony, marriage” and directly from Latin matrimonium “wedlock, marriage,” from matrem (nominative mater) “mother” (see mother (n.1)) + -monium, suffix signifying “action, state, condition.””

      [ http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=matrimony ]

      I’m not sure I understand the writer. But isn’t the etymology exactly the opposite of what she suggests? (I.e. it is because it effectively enforced motherhood at the time it got its name, not because marriage liberates adult females. Awful term, really.)

      1. After explaining that marriage was feminist and it freed women from the wrong kind of sex, it was explained to her that the laws regarding marriage were written by men, for men, and that women were property. That pregnancy was used to control women.

        She then replied that ‘no wonder women learned to hate the natural functioning of their bodies, pregnancy was used to control them’

        So much dumb, I can’t take it. Head hurts.

        I have asked her for the specific date in human hunter gatherer history at which early feminists banded together to force men into marriage.

        I have also asked her to explain why any hunter gatherer tribe would just leave a pregnant woman to die if she didn’t have a dedicated mate. She also needs to explain these bands of roving men who just move from tribe to tribe, impregnating women at random, and then leaving.

        1. She probably doesn’t explain what falling in love and pair bonding is all about either, right? I too am enormously skeptical of her convoluted hypothesis.

          1. Lesbians.

            Why would a lesbian have sexual desire if sexual desire only evolved in women to have sex with men who had sexual desire so that women would not be kicked out of the tribe once pregnant?

          2. Gays are reproductive anomalies and represent perhaps 3 or 4% of the population. They might be explainable by something as yet not completely understood. But I think the idea of a theory of human sexuality is definitely something worth exploring. But it needs experimental data to back up any speculation. How indeed did female sexual behavior evolve? How did male sexual attitudes evolve? Curious scientists and lay-folks would like to know. But, if someone has an ax to grind…

          3. I asked her for a citation from an anthropological journal buttressing her point that ancient pre-historical women invented marriage as the first feminist act.

            Her reply:

            As per previous advice I can’t maintain a conversation who openly defends killing innocent unborn children so that men and women can continue to have sex without responsibility (or men can. Because women still need to have their body invaded and child suctioned/scraped out)

            What’s funny is, in addition to refusing to answer my questions regarding cuckoldry and FGM, there also exists, in every patriarchal society that I know of, and every ancient patriarchal society, men would divorce women (women couldn’t divorce men) and they would keep the children. Yes, men always kept the children, while throwing the woman out on the street. This happened up until the 1920s I believe. The woman being left alone with the kids when the man f’d off to greener pastures is a completely modern idea.

          4. She sounds to me like someone not worth spending too much time on.
            The 20th century trend in marital disputes was for women with children to always keep the kids (and often the house and a substantial part of the estate) . This has been upheld, from what I have heard, even when the mother is insane and the father would be the better provider. Society seems to be at one end of a pendulum or another.

          5. She is extremely childish, as most pro-lifers are.

            I just pasted her words here for the lulz, as she clearly doesn’t understand evolution or anthropology.

Comments are closed.