If evolution is true, one should be able to trace the origin of novel structures from their predecessors, with every step of this evolution being adaptive. If creationism were true, one would never or rarely be able to trace the evolutionary stages of such novelties. Well, we know that evolution is true (if you don’t accept that, go over to your own site, Answers in Genesis), but it’s exciting to see traits whose evolution wasn’t fully understood get this kind of clarification.
One of these traits is the sucker of the remora, and I’ve shamelessly stolen much of this post from Carl Zimmer’s explication over at the Loom, cleverly called “What good is half a sucker?”
Remoras, or suckerfishes (there are several species in the family Echeneidae), are known for a disk-shaped sucker on top of their heads, which they use to fasten themselves to larger sea creatures like sharks, tuna, manta rays, and sea turtles. (Fisherman also use this as a way to pull in sea turtles: they toss a remora on a rope into the water, wait for it to attach to the shell, and reel in the “bait” and the reptile.) In this interspecies association, the host is either unharmed or perhaps slightly slowed by the affixed remora) while the remora benefits by getting a free ride and some scraps from the host’s meals.
Here’s the weird head sucker, with the photo taken from a new paper by Ralph Britz and G. David Johnson in J. Morphology (well, actually December, 2012; only abstract is free online):

dorsal (B), and frontal (C) view.
As Zimmer notes, this is a remarkable adaptation:
When you look closely at the remora’s suction disk, its remarkableness only grows. It looks like a spiked Venetian blind. Pairs of slat-like bones called lamellae form a series of rows running down the length of its head, and muscles running from the remora’s skull to those bones pivot them, creating spaces between the rows.
That negative pressure pulls the remora towards its host’s body. Each lamella also has a comb-like set of pins that help make its clamp even more secure. The whole structure is surrounding by a loose fleshy lip, ensuring that no water slips in, keeping the seal tight.
As a result, remoras can create a vacuum that’s not just strong enough to attach them to an animal, but to stay attached as water rushes past them. They can even hold tight as their hosts try to scrape them off on rocks. But a remora can instantly release itself when it’s time to eat, with just a flick of its muscles.
But where did this thing come from? Earlier biologists suggested that it evolved from the dorsal fin, and now this suggestion is pretty much confirmed by the studies of Britz and Johnson, who did detailed morphological and developmental studies of the sucker and found that several parts of it are “homologous” (that is, have the same genetic and developmental origin) as the dorsal fin of its relatives. Here’s what they say in their last paragraph:
The sucking disc of remoras is one of the most unusual skeletal formations among vertebrates. Even though highly derived in its adult anatomical structure, homology of its constituent parts can be established in a clear and straightforward way by studying the development of the disc. The earliest stages of disc formation allow for the unambiguous recognition of a one to one relationship between interneural spine, intercalary bone, and pectinated lamella, with the proximal-middle radial, distal radial and basally expanded fin spine of other acanthomorphs. Our study highlights again the unique power of ontogenetic investigations, as previously demonstrated in a series of papers that have resolved long-standing issues of homology (Britz and Johnson, 2002; Johnson and Britz, 2005; Hoffmann and Britz, 2006).
One can then hypothesize that an earlier ancestor had a dorsal fin that was could be used to snag a larger fish, and then, over time, this fin would become more sucker-like. Such an ancestor (or one of its relatives) could exist in the fossil record, although of course the patchiness of that record doesn’t guarantee we’d find it. But someone did: Matt Friedman and a group of colleagues, and their report, as Zimmer notes, has just been published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (B). Friedman et al. studied three fossil remoras (about 30 million years old) in the genus Opisthomyzon, and found clear homology between elements of their early suckers and bones of the dorsal fin. The sucker had not yet moved all the way up to the head, and the bones were intermediate between the bones of a fossil relative without a sucker, and the modern remora with a full sucker on the head. Here are two pictures of one fossil showing the intermediate location and shape of the fossil sucker:

A close-up of the adhesion disk (area highlighted in white box above):
Zimmer draws out this scenario:
Friedman’s research now gives us a richer hypothesis for how the remora got its sucker. Some of the remora’s closest living relatives, like cobia, tag along with bigger fish to scavenge on their scraps. The ancestors of remoras may have lived a similar life.
It’s not rare for spiny rayed fishes to grow extra dorsal fin spines. In the ancestors of remoras, such an anatomical fluke may have allowed them to latch their dorsal fin into the skin of a host fish, if only briefly. Even if they could spend a little time hitch-hiking this way, they would save energy that they’d otherwise have to spend on swimming for themselves.
Gradually, the remora’s dorsal fin became better adapted to latching onto other animals. As it moved towards the remora’s head, for example, it reduced drag. And as the fin bones spread outward, they attached the remora more strongly.
Lest I steal too much of Carl’s post, I’ll let you go over to his piece to see the intermediate condition of the bones in this fossil remora, again supporting their origin from a dorsal fin.
So what we have here is a mystery, a hypothesis, a proposed solution based on morphology and embryology, and then verification of that hypothesis based on a fossil find. What better evidence for evolution could we have—though we hardly need one more pebble of evidence on top of the Everest that already exists!
And, my poem in honor of these discoveries:
There are suckers born quite frequently
In evolution’s battle;
Some evolve upon the heads of fish,
And others in Seattle.
h/t: Michael
__________________
Britz, R., and G. D. Johnson. 2012. Ontogeny and homology of the skeletal elements that form the sucking disc of remoras (Teleostei, Echeneoidei, Echeneidae). J. Morphology 273:1353-1366.
Friedman, M., Z. Johanson, R. C. Harrington, T. J. Near, and M. R. Graham. 2013. An early fossil remora (Echinoidea) reveals the early fossil assembly of the adhesion disc. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, vol. 280 published 17 July 2013 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1200.

sub
Funny title, completely untranslatable into my language, Dutch, or into any other language, I guess, without loosing the funny part.
And: evolution never stops to surprise you.
It’s too bad Noah didn’t realize they’d attached themselves to the bottom of his Ark, otherwise they surely would have been mentioned in the Bible
!
Hmmmm maybe this whole ID thing is wrong after all. 🙂
I loved the title & the poem and of course the story of the fish, which actually looks cuter if you see pictures of it swimming in the ocean.
Clever poem, but as a Seattleite myself (my apartment is literally across the street from DI HQ) I feel obliged to point out that the majority of DI Fellows did not evolve here but migrated here from elsewhere — several of them from Harvard in fact.
It’s not the DI fellows who’re suckers…it’s those who fall for their schtick, hook, line, and sinker, who’re the suckers.
And that evolution is, indeed, taking place right across the street from you.
b&
IIRC the Pacific Northwest is one of the least religious parts of the States. But, hey–poetic license. 😀
Well, it’s a shame that attending Harvard doesn’t uproot the religious fervor.
Awesome stuff. Thanks for sharing this, Dr. Coyne!
Haha! Is it it drag to live in Seattle?
I’ve lived hear for 20 years and was only recently aware of the Discovery Institutes home base. I think if they were flexing more power everybody in Seattle would have heard of them. Or, perhaps I’m just late to the game?
Consider the multiple unlikelyhoods of any creature becoming a fossil, the fossil survinging to recent time, the fossil being found and moved to a museum drawer, and the examination of the fossil by someone knowledgable. If we define a miracle as occurrence of a statistically unlikely event, the appearance of a particular fossil in a scholarly publication qualifies.
One could argue that the Journal of Paleontology contains more miracles than the Bible.
You know, thinking a bit more literally about the title of this post…suckers have certainly evolved independently in multiple lineages. At the least, there’s the remora and the octopus and the leach. Might be interesting to plot out the intervals for when that feature arose and figure out the actual average frequency of sucker birth….
b&
Quite an amazing adaptation on an animal that gets a bad rap. The lamellae are oriented in such a way that the harder you pull caudally (ie if you pulled the tail of the the attached remora) the more negative pressure is generated and the remora just holds faster. Swimming faster to try to get rid of the remora only results in the fish holding tighter. To unfasten himself he simply has to relax the outer sucker and swim forward a little. There is little or no energy required to stay affixed; hang loose to hold tight! That’s why they can be used to catch larger reptiles; so long as you keep steady reverse tension on the animal they can’t let go.
I was wondering about that. I had a bunch on me after a shark dive. Was amazed at their sticking power… a couple in some embarrassing places. I stopped trying to unlatch them, eventually, and it was pretty funny to watch them drop into the water as I climbed the ladder into the boat.
I did not know they attached to divers!
Can I just say I loved the title of this post? I can’t read it, and look at the pictures, without guffawing.
Vaal
Interesting.
This is awesome. Everything in biology is only explainable by evolution.
I was a bit skeptical at the beginning of the article, what kind of useful intermediate forms can be to evolve that suckers?
Indeed, it is another evolution of the eye / wings / whales etc.
Still, I beginning to think that the god of these atheists is awesome .. maybe the creationist gods are mistaken?
😀