book 1

February 17, 2011 • 6:50 am

Posted at 6:50 am

2 thoughts on “book 1

  1. What “argument” might they produce to back up their theory?

    What about what “evidence”? An argument is useless, merely a hypothesis. Evidence is the only thing of any relevance. Are these people suggesting that horses and humans evolved, but trilobites spontaneously existed?

    What nonsense!

  2. While I appreciate that it’s geared towards arguing against the creationists, I agree that it shouldn’t be there. It’s like having a physics book say-
    “Some people don’t agree with physics. They think that the universe is all on the back of a giant space turtle, which is on the back of another turtle and so on.”

    “Explain how physics could be an argument against the turtle theory.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *