Bill Maher’s latest news-and-comedy shtick on “Real Time” deals once again with the flak he got for having dinner with President Trump. Remember? Despite Maher constantly criticizing the President’s policies durin gthe dinner, he also reported that he found Trump affable and friendly.
That was enough for liberals to come down on Maher like a ton of bricks, despite the fact that he simply gave his reaction. Trump’s policies were reprehensible, Maher averred, but he was a good host. In today’s world that will do you in. Larry David, for instance, wrote a satire of Maher’s reaction in a NYT op-ed called “Larry David imagines a private dinner with Hitler” (archived here), and I imagine that pissed off Maher.
Apparently Trump posted about his dinner with Maher on Truth Social (on Valentine’s Day), and Trump’s post was full of lies (surprise!). Here Maher corrects the record, and gets a few shots back at Trump for lying, while calling out people with true “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” (“Get a life: stop making him your whole personality”.) But he adds that Trump bears some responsibility for promoting TDS because his racism, misogyny, anti-democratic acts, and corruption “make people crazy.” Maher further also ticks off a few good things that Trump did, including asserting that “penises don’t belong in women’s prisons,” which will simply anger “progressives” more. Maher argues that he may be “the last person from the Lunatic Left that is still an honest broker when it comes to Trump.”
Maher winds up addressing Trump directly, calling him out for his many detestable acts—after he’s given the President plaudits for some things. Yes, Maher seems defensive here, but he’s honest and I still like the guy. I don’t have much truck with people who say that Trump never did anything good, and, in fact, it’s impossible for that to happen.
Bill’s guests were Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), journalist Don Lemon, and author Annabelle Gurwitch/
It’s a good piece! Yes, if Trump could accept criticism without immediately reaching for the nuclear option, he would have more successes than he already has had—and he has had a few. I don’t understand the part of his personality that tends toward retribution.
But then again, I don’t understand the kind of personality that makes anyone seek the Presidency. People with that kind of ambition also have big appetites—appetites for sex, for power, for wealth, for adulation, etc. It’s not surprising that Presidents have strange proclivities (Trump’s for retribution against criticism, for example). Most (but not all) Presidents fall clinically within the range of normal, but they certainly aren’t typical. Typical need not apply.
You don’t have to just imagine a private dinner with Hitler. My extended family have some wonderful old collections of magazines from the first half.if.the 20th century, assembled into huge unwieldy books, and among the articles really is one from the early 30s (I think) on “At home with the Fuhrer”, about his domestic life.