Peregrinations: talks at Oakland University and Purdue

April 10, 2013 • 4:11 am

I’m speaking tomorrow at noon at Oakland University in Michigan, and readers in that area are invited to come. It will be a general talk on the evidence for evolution and the religious opposition to it. The announcement can be found here, and the gist is this:

Jerry Coyne: Why Evolution is True
Join us in the Human Health Building (HHB) 4050 [noon to 1 pm] and enjoy a presentation by Dr. Jerry Coyne (University of Chicago). He will have his new book ( “Why Evolution Is True”) available for purchase ($10) and there will be a book signing immediately following the presentation from 1-2pm. He will provide a secret word on his blog  [JAC: website, not blog!] Wednesday morning so that readers will receive a special bonus when they have their books signed.

And here’s the secret word: “meow“.  Now you can’t just say “meow,” but must make a bona fide attempt to actually meow.  The better the meow, the better cat picture you get. If you don’t meow, you get only a signature.

The folks at Oakland have volunteered to give me a behind-the-scenes tour of the Detroit Zoo, including a special visit to the Bat Rearing Facility. Sadly, they have no baby felids to pet, but with luck I’ll be able to hold a bat.

*****

Next week, on Wednesday and Thursday, I’ll be giving two talks at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana: a research seminar on Wednesday and the John S. Karling Distinguished Lectureship (announcement here) on Thursday afternoon.

Here’s the information about separate research talk:

The research seminar “Two flies on an island:…” will be on Wednesday, April 17, 3:30 pm in MJIS 1001 (Biomedical Research Auditorium).

The Big Karling Talk is at 3:30 p.m on April 18, with a reception at 3 p.m.  Books won’t be on sale, so if you want yours signed (and there will be time for that), please bring your own (the Amazon link is here). There will be a separate secret word for that, announced next week.

Thanks to Todd Shackleford for arranging my visit to Oakland, and Morris Levy for doing the same at Purdue.

April Fool’s joke gone wrong: radio announcers suspended for science prank

April 9, 2013 • 11:58 am

Maybe if more Americans knew about science, two radio announcers from Florida wouldn’t have been fired—and wouldn’t be facing felony charges—for an April Fool prank.  According to ZME Science:

Florida country radio morning-show hosts Val St. John and Scott Fish are currently serving indefinite suspensions and possibly criminal charges for what can only be described as a successful April Fools. They told their listeners that “dihydrogen monoxide” was coming out of the taps throughout the Fort Myers area – as I’m sure you all know, dihydrogen monoxide, or H2O is nothing but water.

As it turns out, their readers unwittingly panicked so much that Lee County utility officials had to issue a county-wide statement calming the fears of chemistry impaired Floridians.

. . . now authorities are trying to prove the DJs are guilty of a felony; they may have pushed it a little too far.

Note the supposedly “superfluous” explanation that dihydrogen monoxide is water.  There’s even a diagram for befuddled readers:

molecue

The locals see this as a serious issue; as author Mihai Andrei notes,

But apparently, calling water by its scientific name is a false water quality issue, blamed by both the authorities and the general public. A poll conducted on GatorCountry asked if the 2 should return to radio, and 78 percent of the answers were ‘Never‘. Sheesh… I just hope all these people would sit down, get a big cup, infuse some Camellia sinensis in dihydrogen monoxide, grab a graphite based writing implement and a chemistry manual, and thoroughly read it and take notes.

This reminds me of a watered-down version of Orson Welles’s famous “War of the Worlds” hoax in 1938, when his company broadcast a radio show about an invasion of Earth by Martians, a show so realistic, with simulated news bulletins, that it caused a panic throughout the U.S. My dad heard it live, and said that people were running amok in the streets of Uniontown, Pennsylvania, convinced that an alien invasion was imminent.

Welles didn’t suffer any punishment for  this except a slap on the wrist from CBS. Times have obviously changed!

The miscreant radio jocks, Val St. John and Scott Fish
The miscreant radio jocks, Val St. John and Scott Fish

I need some hydroxyethane.

h/t: Ant

Business Insider screws up evolution reporting

April 9, 2013 • 8:44 am

Business Insider (founded in 2009) is an up-and-coming website that seems to be a must-read for financial folks, rivalling the online Wall Street Journal. It’s like HuffPo, having some original content but also many links to other pieces. And the articles are short and easily-digested, just right for the harried capitalist who has to make a lot of trades before noon.

Sadly, one of the original content pieces, published on April 3, is a straight piece of creationism, “Creationist explains how humans and dinosaurs could have hunted the Tyrannosaurus rex.” The short piece is about the ludicrous ideas of Dr. Joseph Mastropaolo  (Ph.D. in kineseology, of course), a California creationist who has launched the famous $10,000 challenge, offering anyone that sum if they can disprove the literal truth of Genesis before a judge. (Note to readers: please stop asking ask me to participate in this: these offers  constitute a mug’s game that nobody can win.)

So here’s what curious business folks are reading:

. . . given that he believes that the universe is about 7,000 years old, [Mastropaolo] posits that dinosaurs became extinct relatively recently.

“If we go back a thousand years, we probably had these so-called dragons roaming the earth,” Mastropaolo told BI. “But they couldn’t be called ‘dinosaurs’ because that word hadn’t been invented yet.”

Radiometric dating indicates that some dinosaur fossils are about 65 million years old, but Mastropaolo believes that the technique is “grossly biased, not valid, unreliable, and uncalibrated.”

But here’s the best part:

As for how human beings were able to survive in the same neighborhood as a Tyrannosaurus rex, Mastropaolo said that humans beings would have been able to trick them.

“Human beings were smarter the further back we go in time because they have been less degenerated by the pollutants that we’ve been putting into the air, water, and soil,” he said. “T. rex … could be herded into a blind canyon and have rocks dropped on their heads from above. And they’d soon be done in.”

Furthermore, Mastropaolo believes that they could even have been domesticated the “way we have domesticated cattle and elephants.”

“I can’t imagine that they wouldn’t be able to do it with [a dinosaur],” he said. “We know that animal husbandry goes back thousands of years. Why not? If people found out that there was a dinosaur that they were able to feed and domesticate, why not expect that they used that knowledge to better their standard of living?”

How much lunacy is packed into those quotes! We’re no longer smart enough to outwit T. rex?  We could herd them all into blind canyons?  Or we could domesticate them?

It’s amazing that anyone, much less Business Insider, takes this clown seriously.

But the worst part is this: there is no criticism of his views and no inquiry among experts on dinosaurs or radiometric dating to rebut Mastropaolo’s claim. His arguments are unrebutted.

h/t: Gattina

Another phrase I hate

April 9, 2013 • 5:32 am

I’ve heard this one, which seems to be increasingly common, twice in two days. It’s odious:

“lived experience”

This phrase is often used to describe the lives of oppressed people or members of minorities, as “We need to pay attention to the lived experiences of ________.”  Now I’m a left-winger and all, but I’m also a grammatical conservative, and, for crying out loud, what is wrong with the simple word “experience”?  Is there such a thing as an unlived experience?

We’ve already had a thread on words and phrases that readers find offensive, but feel free to contribute others below.

A living scarf: The blanket octopus

April 9, 2013 • 4:46 am

I post on cephalopods as rarely as I do on dogs, but at least I don’t have an “anti-cephalopod Tuesday.” But some of them are so weird that I can’t resist. A recent post by Katherine Harmon at Octopus Chronicles of Scientific American describes a small group of octopi that go under the name “blanket octopus” (four species in the genus Tremoctopus).  Besides their strange vampire-ish appearance, with the tentacles enclosed in a “cape,” they have an unusual defensive behavior (co-opting the tentacles of a jellyfish) and, especially, the most extreme sexual dimorphism and bizarre mating behavior I’ve heard of in any mollusc. From Wikipedia:

These species exhibit an extreme degree of sexual dimorphism. Females may reach 2 m in length, whereas the tiny males are at most a few centimeters long. The males have a specially modified third right arm which stores sperm, known as a hectocotylus. During mating, this arm detaches itself and crawls into the mantle of the female to fertilize her eggs. The male dies shortly after mating. The females carry over 100,000 tiny eggs attached to a sausage-shaped calcareous secretion held at the base of the dorsal arms and carried by the female until hatching.

As National Geographic describes, the walnut-sized males, weighing only 1/40,000th as much as the females, weren’t even seen alive in the wild until 2003:

Blanket octopuses are rarely seen. They spend their entire life drifting in the open oceans of warm regions worldwide. Females have the odd appearance of a “big pink drifting blanket” said Tregenza, explaining the origins of the octopus’s name.

Among their more unusual behavior, the octopuses employ a unique defense mechanism by tearing off the tentacles of passing Portuguese man-of-war jellyfish. The octopuses are immune to the tentacle’s painful sting. When they encounter potential predators, the octopuses waft the captured man-of-war tentacles in two pairs of its upper arms as an effective deterrent.

The male blanket octopus recently photographed by researchers was shown to clutch tentacle segments in his suckers, said Tregenza [Tom Treganza from the University of Leeds].

. . . If a male does chance across a female, it uses all its resources in an attempt to mate, “as he’s unlikely to encounter another one,” said Tregenza. A male blanket octopus fills a modified tentacle with sperm, tears it off, presents it to its prospective mates, and then drifts off to certain death.

Females store the tentacles inside large internal body cavities until they are ready to lay their eggs. At that time, the female pulls the tentacle out and “squeez[es it] like a tube of toothpaste,” over the eggs, said Tregenza.

This video showing the females was embedded in Harmon’s piece; there’s a really nice shot at the end of a school of fish in an antipredator formation:

And here’s another video taken in the Gulf of Mexico (warning: annoying music!):

It’s not so easy to find pictures of those diminutive males, but here’s one:

Image: Dhugal Lindsay/JAMSTEC/CMarZ
Image: Dhugal Lindsay/JAMSTEC/CMarZ

The mating behavior remind me of the anglerfish, deep-sea creatures in which the males are also very tiny, but also parasitic.  When a male finds a female, he attaches himself permanently to her body, absorbs his head, and fuses his tissue and bloodstream with that of the female.  He becomes, in effect, just a lump on the female’s body, ready to fertilize her eggs. (See a nice video of that here.) This behavior is obviously adaptive for a deep-sea creature, for females are so rare that when you find one, it’s best to never let her go (h/t: to South Pacific).

I often describe anglerfish to my undergraduate students, noting that the male is “nothing more than a parasitic sack of gonads—much like a male undergraduate.” The women students love that.

A beautiful cat

April 8, 2013 • 2:48 pm

Here’s one picture from a BBC slideshow of “Cat beauty contest held in Romania.” The alert reader who sent it suggested that this cat was on drugs. My response was, “Coffee.”

Beautiful cat

I must say, though, that I have a weakness for Sphynx cats. I held one once at a cat show, and it was not only super affectionate, but its skin felt like suede. (They’re not completely hairless.)

h/t: Su

An optical illusion dance

April 8, 2013 • 12:19 pm

Matthew Cobb sent me this, demanding that I post it.  Since he’s a good contributor here, I bow to his wishes:

You have to admit that it’s quite clever—and disconcerting. According to Dr. Cobb, there are others like this on YouTube. I’ll take his word for it.

Annette died

April 8, 2013 • 10:50 am

If you’re an American of a certain age, you will already know who I’m talking about; if you’re not, her name was Annette Funicello, of the Mickey Mouse Club of yore. According to the Los Angeles Times, Annette died at 70 today, after suffering from multiple sclerosis for many years.

We’ll forget about her series of beach movies with Frankie Avalon, which I hated.  The girl I remember is the one shown below, and she’s the first person of the opposite sex who awakened in me stirrings of. . . . well, desire. I’m sure many American guys my age will say the same. She was 7 years older than I, and to me that was a woman.  We watched the Mickey Mouse Club because it was television for kids, but one of the stars was the lovely, dark-haired Annette, friendly and talented.

Other guys could hanker after the Aryan-esque Darlene, but I’d take Annette any time—the Sophia Loren of children’s t.v.

It’s hard to realize she’s gone—much less that she was 70! Though I haven’t thought about her for years, a world without Annette somehow seems emptier.

466px-The_Mickey_Mouse_Club_Mouseketeers_Annette_Funicello_1956