Palestinians kill and terrorize Israelis, world studiously ignores it

October 21, 2015 • 9:30 am

My travels have prevented me from following the situation in the Middle East very closely, but what I have seen lately has amazed me.  People are, for instance, bemoaning the death of Palestinian youths (and adults) killed by Israelis. What they fail to note is that these killings occurred after the Palestinians (often teenaged boys) were trying to kill Israeli soldiers or civilians using knives, rocks, or cleavers. Other Palestinians are trying to run down Israeli civilians using cars. In other words, the latest wave of “violence” against Palestinians seems to involve mostly self-defense against Palestinian terror attacks.

Yet the world ignores this. Some people in fact appear to fault Israelis for trying to defend their own lives. Newspaper headlines are ambiguous, like this one from today’s ABC News (click on screenshot to go to article). There’s ambiguity about the “attack,” but in fact the two Palestinians were trying to attack Israeli soldiers with knives:

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 6.18.18 AM

Here’s a headline from the BBC, which was changed three times in an hour after complaints that it was misleading (I suspect it was deliberately misleading, like the one above):

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 6.22.49 AM

Who were the two men killed? Not Palestinians. They were these two, stabbed to death in the Old City:

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 6.26.57 AM

Other horrific attacks on Israelis citizens? How about two parents, Eitam and Na’ama Henkin, shot to death in their car in front of their four children in the back seat—children aged 4 months, 4 years, 7 years, and 9 years. Did you hear much about that? I didn’t.  Here are the victims:

6468094492280autoresize

Perhaps the best summary of the situation I’ve seen has been an editorial in, of all places, the Harvard Crimson, a piece called “Deafening Silence.” I’m not going to cite Israeli opinion pieces, even though their op-eds should be considered at least valid enough to merit a read, even if one doesn’t agree with their content or feel that their views are impartial. But I guarantee there will be those who will also discount the Crimson editorial because it’s written by someone with a Jewish name, Rachel Huebner. But there are links in her piece that allow you to check everything for yourself.  A snippet:

But the world is silent.

Imagine that terrorists were stabbing to death Americans who were on their daily walks to the supermarket. Imagine that terrorists were driving their cars into crowds of New York commuters waiting for the train. Imagine if driving on a Chicago highway were dangerous because a lynch mob could surround your car at any moment. Imagine having to kiss your family members goodbye each morning, unsure if you would survive the day. The world would not be silent.

Israel is experiencing an onslaught of vicious terrorism. The attacks are terrorizing the entire country. Citizens have begun sleeping with knives on their bed tables and young parents are drafting wills for their preschool children.

But the world is not listening. Newspapers have failed to document the extent and nature of the egregious murders on their front pages. World leaders have yet to issue condemnations of Palestinian aggression. One could watch a variety of daily news shows and be unaware that anything out of the ordinary has been happening in Israel.

Indeed! If Obama’s said anything about this, I don’t know about it. All we hear are tepid calls for “restraint.”

Until I did a bit of digging the last two days, I had no idea what was going on. And although I’ve repeatedly called for Israel to withdraw from the West Bank and for a two-state solution. I don’t see that happening now, for both Hamas and Fatah seem to want the complete extirpation of Israel. This is a dilemma. Further, although Israel has condemned the execrable acts of its own citizens, like the revenge killing of a sixteen-year old Palestinian boy, Mohammed Abu Khdeir, and has tracked down and jailed the Israeli perpetrators, Palestinian authorities (and, of course, imams and other Muslim clerics) not only fail to condemn the violence, but encourage it and glorify the terrorists. Do you think the Palestinian authorities will find and jail those who stab and hack Israeli citizens, or run them over with cars? Don’t make me laugh.

Have a look at this video (one of many you can find without breaking a sweat), in which a Palestinian cleric, speaking on Al-Aqsa television, the official Hamas television channel, says “not a single Jew will remain on this land.” and “We will not leave a single one of you, alive or dead, on this land. By Allah, we will dig up your bones from your graves and get them out of this country.”  That, of course, means Israel. If this kind of venom were spewed against Muslims in, say, the U.S., do you have any doubt that people would rise up against such horrible, violent bigotry? But of course it’s ignored because, after all, it’s okay when Palestinian state media says this kind of stuff.

Or if Israeli television called for the total extirpation of Palestinians in such a way, is there any doubt that Americans would put it on the front page of the New York Times, and the world would condemn Israel? Of course they would. But it’s okay when the Palestinians do it.

Huebner continues:

The world must not only condemn the horrific acts of terror; we must also condemn those responsible for inciting the violence. The Palestinian Authority is one group that we must demand be held accountable. In a recent speech on Palestinian TV, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas stated: “We bless every drop of blood that has been spilled for Jerusalem. With the help of Allah, every shaheed (martyr) will be in heaven.” He called on Palestinians to prevent Jews from entering the Temple Mount “by any means possible” and declared that Jews “have no right to defile [Al Aqsa Mosque] with their filthy feet.” Days later, he declared the Oslo Accords void in a speech at the United Nations. Throughout the recent wave of terror, Fatah, Abbas’s party, has delivered leaflets in Palestinian towns praising the terrorists, and Fatah Twitter accounts have glorified the attacks. This week, a knife-wielding Gaza cleric called upon his congregants to stab Jews and “cut them into body parts.” He urged some to “restrain the victim, while others attack him with axes and butcher knives.”

The condemnations are not going to happen, for the Western media, as well as some atheist bloggers, have adopted a narrative in which any atrocity committed by a Palestinian is to be ignored or whitewashed (or even blamed on Israel), while vilifying Israeli soldiers and civilians for daring to defend themselves. Yes, the situation is complicated, and there’s a lot to be said for and against both sides (see this thoughtful Daily Beast article, “Inside the Mind of Israel/Palestine”, by Maajid Nawaz, a Muslim). But one thing is certain: these knife, car, and cleaver attacks are terrorism, and their victims had every right to defend themselves. Arguments about the Temple Mount are NO justification for killing. Make that two things that are certain: the other is that the Western media will continue to ignore or downplay the Palestinian terrorism.

I don’t know what the solution to the Israel/Palestine situation is, but I know hypocrisy when I see it. If you’re going to condemn Palestinian citizens killed by the IDF, even accidentally, you must also condemn Israelis citizens deliberately killed by Palestinian terrorists. Why this hypocrisy exists—well, I’ll leave you to discuss it below. Just remember, liberals have a proud tradition (at least until recently) of being open to the possibility that they might be wrong.

Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ Jihadism

October 21, 2015 • 8:15 am

The lastest Jesus and Mo strip, “Prey” came to me by email with one extra line:

Have I mentioned what a dreadful book the Koran is? I can’t remember.

2015-10-21

If you haven’t read the Qur’an, or looked into it, you should. Of course adherents claim that one can’t fully grasp its nuances without a reading in the original Arabic, but “The Skeptic’s Annotated Qur’an“, free online, will do. Of course it’s annotated by a nonbeliever, but that will help you judge the relative frequency of “nice” versus “nasty” verses. Relevant verses are labeled in the margin with certain “trigger warnings”, to wit:

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 5.40.29 AM

If you want a version without annotations, go here. The versions are nearly identical.

Readers’ wildlife photographs

October 21, 2015 • 7:30 am

We have photos from a new contributor, Rachel Wilmoth. Her notes:

I’m (mainly) a lurker on your website, and was inspired by the readers’ wildlife photos posted yesterday, Oct. 19. My fiance and I went to South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, and Zimbabwe last month. The wildlife and scenery were astounding. I’d like to share some photos.

The herd of African elephants (Loxodanta africana), lazing lion, zebras, elephants eating, and giraffes drinking were all in Etosha National Park, in Namibia.

IMG_4401

IMG_4989

Lions (Panthera leo)

IMG_4502

Plains zebra (Equus quagga, formerly Equus burchellii, per Wikipedia)

IMG_4667

Giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis):

IMG_4503

The sand dune is Dune 45, and is located in the Sossusvlei, in Namibia:

IMG_3922

The penguins are African penguins (Spheniscus demersus), and the photo was taken at Boulders Beach, in Zuid-Afrika. I was lucky to get the shot I did, as they started squabbling two seconds later:

IMG_4128

The great white pelicans (Pelecanus onocrotalus) were at Walvis Bay, in Namibia. They look large, but only weigh 3-6 kilos:

IMG_4123

There was a large colony of Cape Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus) at Cape Cross. They’re loud (and the young ones sound like goats). They also reek to high heaven. The picture is of a seal pup:

IMG_4357

The small frog was found in the Okavango Delta. [Readers: any IDs?]

IMG_4454

The pictures hippo (Hippopotamus amphibius) and the sunset were taken from the Chobe river:

IMG_5387

IMG_4518

The photos big male lion and the prides of lionesses, as well as the water buffalo, and antelope (possibly a kudu, but I’m not 100% certain) were all taken in Chobe national park. Some lionesses were eating an elephant that had died of illness. By the way the antelope was just running to run, no predators were hot on its heels.

IMG_5431

IMG_5446

IMG_5509

Water buffalo (Syncerus caffer):

IMG_5474

Readers: any ID on this antelope?

IMG_5593

Finally, the last picture is of an aerial shot over the Zimbabwe side of Victoria Falls. The flow of water from the Zambezi was nearing its annual low point.

9 (1)

Wednesday: Hili dialogue

October 21, 2015 • 4:35 am

It’s Hump Day, and my big activity for the day is turning in my old University ID card to get the new PCC(E) ID card, and visiting the local Social Security Office to give them my birth certificate. I grow old. . . .I grow old. . . . I shall put on extra clothes against the cold.  Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Cyrus has mustered the courage to reprove Hili for nomming his food:

Hili: I like our sharing bed and board.
Cyrus: I do too, but stay out of my bowl, please.

P1030505
In Polish:
Hili: Lubię tę naszą wspólnotę łoża.
Cyrus: Ja też, ale nie wtykaj nosa do mojej miski, proszę.

 

Mother Teresa’s Missionaries of Charity refuse to allow Indian orphans to be adopted by single or divorced parents

October 20, 2015 • 12:00 pm
How many lives are injured by Catholic dogma, with the Church’s response that Dogma is Dogma, and All Will Be Set Right in the New Life? This one’s particularly noxious, as the policy of Mother Teresa’s Missionaries of Charity is dooming orphans to a life in state custody, and preventing them from getting forever homes.
According to The Catholic Herald, the Catholic News Agency, and The Telegraph, the Missionaries are closing down their adoption service after changes in Indian law that now allow single and divorced parents to adopt children. (Gays in India are still forbidden to adopt children—an odious law that should be changed NOW.) India recently streamlined its notoriously labyrinthine adoption laws because there is a huge backlog of orphans compared to people willing to adopt them via the old cumbersome process.
The closure of 30 adoption agencies means that the Missionaries prefer children to live on the street, or abide in government homes for destitute kids, than to find a home with a single parent. Why? Well, first, because single parents can’t provide “real love”. From the Catholic Herald:

Maneka Gandhi, head of the Women and Child Development Ministry, said the Missionaries of Charity have “cited ideological issues” with the adoption guidelines and that “they do not want to come under a uniform secular agenda.”

Sister Amala of Nirmala Shishu Bhawan, a New Delhi orphanage run by the Missionaries of Charity, said: “We have already shut our adoption services, because we believe our children may not receive real love. We do not wish to give children to single parents or divorced people.

“It is not a religious rule but a human rule. Children need both parents, male and female. That is only natural, isn’t it?”

Oh really? Not a religious rule but a human rule? That’s simply a lie. I’ve been to India and seen the conditions in both orphanages and for children on the street. Believe me, a single parent is far better than these alternatives.

From the Catholic News Agency:

“Our rules only allow married couples to adopt,” Sister Amala explained, saying the sisters are concerned about the moral upbringing of the children who are adopted by single individuals, rather than a mother and a father.

Sister Amala seems to be a spokesperson for this practice, but the Telegraph gives what I think is the real reason why these kids won’t find homes:

One of the fears of sisters in the conservative Roman Catholic order was that single parent could “turn out” to be gay or lesbian, even though adoption by homosexuals is not allowed in India.

“The new guidelines hurt our conscience,” Sister Amala, who runs the group’s children’s home in New Delhi, told The Indian Express.

“They are certainly not for religious people like us. What if the single parent who we give our baby turns out to be gay or lesbian? What security or moral upbringing will these children get? Our rules only allow married couples to adopt.”

That’s just immoral.  And the Indian government is properly inflexible. As the Telegraph also notes, if the Missionaries don’t comply, and they won’t, then I do fear for these kids, who will be placed in state custody. Maneka Gandhi wants to up the number of adopted orphans from the current 4,000 per year (out of 20-30 million orphans!) to 50,000: an admirable goal. But she noted that if the Missionaries don’t comply, the kids will go elsewhere, and, if you know India, where they go won’t be pleasant:

“We are trying and persuading them because they are valuable, good people and have experience,” [Gandhi] said. “But if they do not follow the central guidelines, we will be left with no option but to de-recognise the orphanages run by them and shift the children to other places.”

Just like the Missionaries like their dying destitutes to die in pain because suffering is holy (it’s equivalent to being kissed by the tears of Jesus), so they prefer to let children suffer rather than give them a gay or single parent. Let us at last stop idolizing Mother Teresa and her acolytes. They help the poor for one reason only: to bring them to Jesus. Their hearts are hard and their ways immoral.

SMBC Kickstarter raises money for religion-themed comic compilation, features “Speciation”

October 20, 2015 • 10:45 am

Zach Weinersmith of Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal is raising money on Kickstarter to finance a collection of his religion-themed comic strips. The project is “Religion: Ruining Everything since 4004 BC.” A bit of information:

What’s in the Book?

The book is a collection of the best religion jokes on SMBC over the last ten years! And, as a bonus, there will be a number of exclusive comics. The number will be determined by the amount of funding raised during the kickstarter.

Is This Book Mean to Religion?

Not really. Or, at least, the nature of the humor isn’t mean-spirited, but the comic does mock plenty of sacred concepts. If you are a religious person, we hope you laugh in the same way we hope science fans laugh at the science jokes in our last book.

Um. . . I wonder if Zach realizes the futility of that hope.

So far the project has has raised almost $70,000, and the rewards for contributing include a spiffy Abridged Bible. But what I like best, feeling somewhat self-aggrandizing today, is the two-minute video ad used to promote the project, which includes a cameo of the book I’m proudest of—and the one that’s least read. It’s 40 seconds into the video, and I’ve made a screenshot (click on it to go to Zach’s page):

Screen shot 2015-10-19 at 3.27.22 PM

Note that her hair is on fire! It’s the work of Satan. . .

UPDATE: Another pair of twe**ts:

h/t: JJE