Matthew Inman: a very short documentary

November 12, 2015 • 1:30 pm

If, like me, you love The Oatmeal comics created by Matthew Inman, you’ll want to see this three-minute documentary of his life, “My life in 171 seconds,” described on the Oatmeal page this way: “Saucony made a mini-documentary about my cartooning, eating, and running habits. This was shot in my house in Seattle, Washington over a couple of days.”

Be sure to read one of Inman’s latest and most poignant strips, “It’s going to be okay,” which has a surprise ending. And here’s one of my favorites (apologies if I’ve posted this before). Inman seems to have a love-hate relationship with cats, which you might see in the documentary above.

cat_whiskey

h/t: Diane G.

Ted Cruz: No atheist deserves to be President

November 12, 2015 • 12:00 pm

Predictably, Republican candidates for the Presidential nomination are up to their usual pandering to the faithful and osculation of religion. But it doesn’t get much more blatant than this statement from Ted Cruz, junior Senator from Texas, reported by Right Wing Watch (my emphasis):

Ted Cruz was thethird Republican presidential candidate to appear at the “National Religious Liberties Conference” in Iowa yesterday, an event organized by extremist right-wing pastor Kevin Swanson, who earlier in the program proclaimed that, according to the Bible, “the sin of homosexuality … is worthy of death.”

Swanson introduced Cruz by stating that Jesus Christ “is king of the President of the United States whether he will admit it or not and that president should submit to His rule and to His law” before asking Cruz to share his opinion on how important it is for “the President of the United States to fear God.”

Cruz, predictably, asserted that fear of God is absolutely vital, declaring that “any president who doesn’t begin every day on his knees isn’t fit to be commander-in-chief of this nation.

Here’s the video:

Although a substantial proportion of Americans agree with Cruz that an atheist isn’t fit to be President (40% in a recent Gallup poll)*, I doubt that everyone in that group would require a President who begins his (or her, starting in 2017) knees. At any rate, Cruz is going against the U.S. Constitution here, which, in Article VI, paragraph 3, says that no religious test should be required for government office.

________________

*The good news, though: 58% of Americans now say they would vote for a qualified atheist candidate for President, and that’s up from only 18% in 1958 (check the link above). This, I assert, is a strong sign of the waning of religion, and attendant reduction in demonization of atheism, in the United States.

h/t: jsp

Accommodationism at the American Astronomical Society

November 12, 2015 • 10:30 am

Here’s an abstract from a current meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS), along with a transcript below if you don’t have a magnifying glass. This was sent to me by an attendee (who wishes to remain anonymous) of the annual meeting of the Division for Planetary Sciences of the AAS.

Screen shot 2015-11-11 at 3.17.13 PM
Screen shot 2015-11-11 at 3.17.32 PM

When I read this, I was flummoxed: why would a scientific organization present an abstract about a homeschool course trying to comport science with religion? It’s essentially a statement pushing one view of theology: that there’s no conflict between these areas, when in fact other people disagree. It has nothing to do with science itself.

This abstract does not belong in a scientific meeting. As the authors note, “The role of science educators is to teach science, not to impose worldviews.” But what are these authors doing but imposing a worldview—science and religion are BFFs—on the children who read their book?  Here’s a transcript of the above (indented; my comments are flush left):

CONTROL ID: 236537
TITLE: The Crossroads of Science and Faith

ABSTRACT BODY: Abstract (2,250 Maximum Characters) : We have recently completed a 4-year project to produce a textbook for students that uniquely addresses the needs of the Christian homeschool community. It is also relevant for students of other faith and non-faith backgrounds. Two elements are at work: parents want their kids to become mature adults adhering to the faith of their upbringing, and students are challenged when they don’t understand how to rationally discuss their beliefs in relation to many current scientific discoveries. To add to the polarization, a few scientists have spread an atheistic naturalistic worldview together with their teaching of science as if it was part of science itself. As a result many parents avoid materials they consider controversial and students later come to believe they must choose between science and their faith. The key to bridging this gap are professional astronomers who hold to a Christian worldview and who can speak both languages, understanding the complexities of both communities.

This, of course, buttresses one of the main goals of Christian homeschooling: to avoid exposing children to anything that might damage their faith or make them question it. In truth, I seriously doubt that in public secondary schools children are exposed to “atheistic worldviews” that supposedly make them choose between science and faith. The reason young people exposed to science leave their faith is, I suspect, mainly because science teaches them to question, to doubt, and to trust evidence. Taken seriously, the produces an erosion of faith. And that’s why people like this book’s authors are so desperate to get to the kids before they have that exposure. The book is, in fact, a form of brainwashing: imposing the parents’ religious views on the children.  The abstract continues:

The role of science educators is to teach science, not to impose worldviews. Science is well received by Christians when it is presented not as a threat to faith, but rather as a complementary way to understand God, leading to a more integrated view of reality.

“A more integrated view of reality”? This, of course, presumes that the tenets of Christianity are aspect of reality. Why can’t the authors just present the science without any mention of faith? Why wouldn’t that be “well received”? Again we see a concerted effort by religious scientists to avoid at all costs letting the kids think for themselves about how the science affects the worldview they’ve been fed.

Our textbook boasts four hallmarks, providing students with: 1) An understanding of the relationship between faith and science with the goal of helping students to identify and integrate their own worldview. 2) Scientifically reviewed and accurate astronomical information. 3) Examples of scientists who have wrestled with science/faith issues and come to a coherent relationship between the two. And 4) exercises for the students to interact with the material in both faith and scientific areas. We hope this will be a resource to help parents who hold tightly to particular ideologies to be less closed to current scientific discovery and more excited about how new discoveries can bolster and enable their faith. We will present an overview of our materials, the positive experience we have had so far in testing our materials, and our goals for future training within the homeschool and church communities. For more information about the textbook see, http://www.glimpseofhissplendor.com/

CURRENT * CATEGORY: Education CURRENT : None

AUTHORS/INSTITUTIONS: S.D. Benecchi, Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, Arizona, UNITED STATES; G. Kober, GSFC/NASA, Greenbelt, Maryland, UNITED STATES; P. Gossard, Carin University, Langhorne, Pennsylvania, UNITED STATES.

Note that three of the four “hallmarks” have nothing to do with science itself, but represent efforts to assure students that they can have their astronomy and Jesus too. The book tells students about scientists who have managed to comport the incompatible naturalistic and supernaturalist worldviews, but not about those scientists, like Steven Weinberg, who haven’t.

Such is the nature of religious homeschooling in this nation, and I abhor it. Perhaps there’s a rationale for homeschooling if you think your kids aren’t getting good academic instruction in the local schools, but the main reason in the U.S. is not that, but to keep children enclosed in a religious cocoon so, when they enter the real world, they’ve been thoroughly and irrevocably indoctrinated.

The textbook, as described on Benecchi’s website, is The Crossroads of Science and Faith: Astronomy Through a Christian Worldview.  All three authors are described as “having been raised on a Christian home.” As described on the site, the motivation for writing this group was to stem the attrition of Christians from their faith because they learn about science. As I’ve noted before, one of the main reasons young Christians leave the church, at least as discerned by a Barna Group poll, is that “churches come across as antagonistic to science.” The book’s description:

Statistics show that a large number of students who claim to be Christians abandon their faith during their college years. While there may be many reasons for this sad abandonment of faith, research shows that confusion about science and faith issues play an important role in this outcome.

The motivation of the authors in writing this textbook is to change the statistics mentioned above by preparing students to engage in courteous and thoughtful dialogue with respect to science and faith issues. They also seek to equip students to defend their faith with sound reasoning and confidence while they learn about the remarkable science of astronomy.

book-cover

Salman Rushdie, receiving Chicago Tribune literary award, decries college censorship

November 12, 2015 • 9:30 am

According to a story in my local paper, The Chicago Tribune (you might have to register, but it’s free), last Saturday Salman Rushdie accepted the paper’s award for lifetime achievement in literature. Despite the fact that security was tight (Rushdie’s still under a fatwa for having written The Satanic Verses) and the event took place at 10 in the morning, the 1800-seat hall was still sold out. After cracking some jokes, Rushdie got down to business:

It was on the subject of freedom of expression, in academia and elsewhere, that Rushdie’s serious side came out. “It’s nonsense, and it needs to be called out as nonsense and rejected as thoroughly as possible,” he said of attempts on college campuses — by university administrations and by students themselves — to engage in various forms of censorship. “There was an episode a few months ago where (some incoming) students at Duke University refused to read Alison Bechdel’s book (‘Fun Home’) because it was written by a lesbian and offended their religious beliefs. [JAC: I wrote about that here.] I thought, ‘Maybe you should just not be at Duke. Maybe you should just step down and make room for people who actually want to learn something.'”

Warming to his theme, Rushdie said universities should be refuges for the unfettered exchange of ideas. “The university is the place where young people should be challenged every day, where everything they know should be put into question, so that they can think and learn and grow up,” he said. “And the idea that they should be protected from ideas that they might not like is the opposite of what a university should be. It’s ideas that should be protected, the discussion of ideas that should be given a safe place. The university should be a safe space for the life of the mind. That’s what it’s for.”

Baby rock squirrels rehabilitated

November 12, 2015 • 7:30 am

In lieu of Readers’ Wildlife photos today, I’ll present a nice 7-minute video, sent by reader Lauren, of four newborn rock squirrels (Otospermophilus variegatus: a denizen of Mexico and the American southwest). This family was rehabilitated with great effort by “Dr. Matt,” a caring guy who founded a Texas rehab organization, Vet Ranch. Lauren notes:

Vet Ranch is an interesting channel. Through donations and money earned by video views (of these and his Demolition Ranch videos), this vet provides free medical care for injured strays and shelter animals, and finds them homes. A lot of the videos show traumatic injuries and surgical procedures, but this one doesn’t.

I love watching these rodents nom strawberries.

And more information from the organization itself:

If you are interested in helping with animals in the future, please visit http://www.vetranchrescue.org to learn more about what we do and to donate if you would like. Dr. Matt Carriker, a veterinarian licensed in Texas founded Vet Ranch Inc., a 501(c)(3), tax exempt non-profit organization. There is no shortage of pets in need, so every donation means more lives we can positively change. If you are not able to donate, please enjoy the videos and share if you like them!!!

 

Thursday: Hili dialogue

November 12, 2015 • 4:48 am

The end of the week is in sight, I have a ton of work to do, and posting may be light. As always, though, I will do my best.  I have made inquiries about whether Leon will be able to attend the wedding of his staff, and will report back with the answer.  On this day last year (has it really been a year?), the Philae probe landed on the comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. And, on November 12, 1945, the great Neil Young was born, making today his 70th birthday! Meanwhile in Dobrzyn, Hili is oblivious to the festivities, caring only for topping up her stomach. She also seems a bit unfocused:

Hili: Let’s go back home.
A: Why?
Hili: It’s time for a second breakfast. An hour has passed since the first one.

P1030578 (1)

In Polish:
Hili: Wracamy do domu.
Ja: Czemu?
Hili: Pora na drugie śniadanie, od pierwszego minęła już cała godzina.

Does God take sides?

November 11, 2015 • 2:30 pm

A strip from Pearls before Swine by Stephan Pastis:

Screen shot 2015-11-11 at 5.58.43 AM

Remember that 27% of Americans—and 38% of white evangelical Protestants—believe that God plays a role in determining who wins sporting events. And 50% of Americans approve when athletes publicly thank God during a sporting event (only 8% disapprove). This strip merely shows what happens when you ask these millions of people how it works.

h/t: jsp