My conversation with Richard Dawkins: Washington D.C. (and your chance to submit questions)

April 4, 2017 • 10:30 am

Richard Dawkins is doing a four-appearance visit to the US next month:


The four stops on the tour are Los Angeles, Boulder, Washington, and Miami (with Dave Barry doing the discussion there!), and they’re being held to benefit the Center for Inquiry.

On May 24, at the Lisner Auditorium in Washington, D.C., I’ll have an hour’s conversation with Richard onstage, and then both of us will answer questions for half an hour—though I think people should be querying Richard and not me (I’m fully aware of whom they’re coming to see!).

Tickets are only $29, or, if you’re flush, $250 for the special VIP package. Go to the link in the first paragraph, or click on the screenshot below, for information on the event.

To buy tickets, go here or click on the screenshot below. They’ll go fast—as usual when Richard talks.

Finally, I’ll crowdsource here some questions or topics you’d like to hear Richard discuss. What would you like him to talk about, or what questions would you put to him? I have some ideas, of course, a few based on his upcoming book of essays; but some input from readers would be useful.  Everybody suggest one question! (I’ve already asked him the “boxers or briefs” question when we last chatted at Northwestern University. I also said he didn’t have to answer that one.)

If you’re in Washington, I’ll see you there. They’ll be selling my books as well as Richard’s, so you can have one with a cat drawn in for this special occasion.

Wetas, cave wetas, and lagniappe (cat versus weta)

April 4, 2017 • 9:30 am

Some of the most unusual endemic insects in New Zealand are the wētā, orthopterans. They’re often referred to as “crickets,” but they’re in the families  Anostostomatidae and Rhaphidophoridae and not the cricket family (Gryllidae). Although Wikipedia says that there are 70 species of wētā (all endemic to this country), there are doubtlessly a lot more, as another guide I have lists several unnamed species.

Besides all New Zealand species of wētā being flightless, they are famed for their fierceness and size. The world’s heaviest insect is the Little Barrier Island Giant Weta (Deinacrida heteracantha), weighing in at a ponderous 9-35 grams (0.3-1.3 oz), but can weigh as much as 70 grams (2.5 ounces), which means that only about 6 of the biggies would weigh a pound. Here are two pictures of that species (not my photos):

These now live on the island as they were destroyed by introduced mammalian predators. The early Maori also liked to eat them. (See here for additional facts.)

Another strange species is the Mountain Stone Wētā (Hemideina maori). A denizen of high altitudes on the South Island, it can survive being frozen solid for months. Wikipedia says this (see also here and here):

Mountain stone weta can survive being frozen for months in a state of suspended animation down to temperatures of about -10 °C. At temperatures below -10 °C approximately 85% of their body water is crystallised, which is one of the highest ice contents known for any animal. During winter their haemolymph (the insect equivalent of blood) contains low molecular weight  cryoprotectants such as amino acids especially proline (up to about 100 mM) and the disaccharide trehalose. These substances are synthesized during autumn and their concentration decreases again during spring and summer (Proline concentration decreases to about 10 mM during summer). The amino acids and sugars presumably help to decrease the ice content colligatively. However, they probably also have a direct protective effect on membranes and proteins via direct interaction or by modifying the water layer with the closest proximity to the molecules. It also displays the defensive behaviour of “playing dead”, by lying still for a short time on its back with legs splayed and claws exposed and jaws wide open ready to scratch and bite, this behavior is often accompanied with regurgitation.

Here’s a Mountain Stone Wētā (not my photo):

Finally, Tree Wētā of several species (genus Hemideina) are common, and they’re fearsome, as males have huge heads and can inflict a nasty bite (they’re found in dead wood, and can live in firewood piles around houses). This video shows a cat encountering what I think is a tree wētā. Look at that head and those pincers! The sexual dimorphism probably indicates that the males fight each other for females.

Two days ago Geoffrey, my host, took me on a hike above Lake Okatina to look for cave wētā. There are several species, all of course living in caves, and all with huge antennae and long, spindly legs. The species we were looking for is almost certainly the Oparara Cave Wētā (Gymnoplecton spp.)  Geoffrey had spotted them before in these shallow caves that the Maori dug in hillsides that, when first used, were on nearly vertical slopes that have now eroded into hills.

It’s not clear why the Maori dug these caves: it could be to store the bones of their ancestors, their food, or even to hide out (they can hold one or two people). What is clear is that they’re inhabited by hordes of cave wētā, which can bite. When you crawl into one of these caves with a flashlight, you have to make sure you don’t brush the opening or the top, or you could get bitten. It’s a bit anxiety-inducing!

Once inside, when you shine the flashlight on the ceiling, you find it covered with cave wētā, which, with their long legs and longer antennae, look like spiders. I’m not generally a timid person, but I was fearful they’d all come raining down on me!

These photos were taken by using a flashlight to focus the camera, and then, turning off the flashlight, shooting blindly at the ceiling. I think they turned out well, all things considering:

I inverted this photo so you could see its features. They normally hang upside down on the ceiling. Note the reduced eyes, common in cave animals.

Because the Maori complained that Europeans raided caves to steal the treasures interred with their ancestors, the New Zealand government built this concrete bunker atop the hill to house the remains, complete with a lockable steel door. But of course that got broken into as well, and now Maori bury their dead in special cemeteries. Geoffrey said that there were rumors that this bunker, once emptied, was inhabited by a European hermit for two decades. It’s a horrible place to live as it’s cold, dank, and dark, and I’m not sure that story is true!

h/t: Nicole Reggia

The link between evolution and conservation: the case of the bumblebee

April 4, 2017 • 7:42 am

by Matthew Cobb

This brief animated video was made by my final year student, Izzy Taylor, as part of her Zoology degree. It’s all her own work. She needs comments from viewers, so I’d be very grateful if you could spend 7 minutes having a quick look, and then posting your views – suggestions, criticisms, plaudits – in the comments below. I promise you’ll learn something interesting!

Tuesday: Hili dialogue

April 4, 2017 • 6:30 am

by Grania

Good morning!

In 1964 the Beatles pulled of something of a coup occupying the top five positions on the Billboard Hot 100, a feat yet to be matched.

No. 1, “Can’t Buy Me Love”
No. 2, “Twist and Shout”
No. 3, “She Loves You”
No. 4, “I Want to Hold Your Hand”
No. 5, “Please Please Me”

Four years later in 1968 civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. was shot and killed in Memphis.

Today is the birthday of Anthony Perkins (1932), the man who terrified with his performance as Norman Bates in Hitchcock’s Psycho. My Irish parish priest back in the day admitted years later that the scene where the mummified mother is revealed literally made his hair stand on end. (Oops, spoilers.)

Legendary Blues musician Muddy Waters (McKinley Morganfield) was also born today in 1913.

In Dobrzyn Hili is having very specific visions. Or something.

A: What do you see up there?
Hili: Virgin of Guadalupe. She is sitting by the chimney.

In Polish:

Ja: Coś tam zobaczyła?
Hili: Matkę Boską z Gwadelupy, siedzi na dachu koło komina.

The staff of Gus has sent on some new pictures of him investigating his domain.

Templeton gives $200K to Religion News Service for reporting on “the intersection of science and religion”

April 3, 2017 • 2:52 pm

Just in case you entertained the notion–one promoted by the John Templeton Foundation–that the JTF is becoming less attached to its goal of fusing science and religion (Sir John thought that science could give evidence for God), here’s a piece from Religion News reporting that the JTF has given the Religious News Foundation a lot of dosh to promote the compatibility of science and faith:

A snippet:

The two-year reporting project will analyze how science and religion intertwine to shine new light on the big questions of purpose and reality.

WASHINGTON – Religion News Foundation has received a two-year $210,000 grant from the West Conshohocken, Pa.-based John Templeton Foundation to help inform the public about how science and religion intersect.

The “Double Helix” reporting project will result in at least 40 original news and feature story packages produced by the Religion News Foundation’s subsidiary, Religion News Service, published at religionnews.com and distributed to some 100 subscribing and partner news outlets for republication. Stories will investigate the religious, spiritual, ethical and philosophical implications of today’s most talked about developments in science, such as artificial intelligence, robotics, genetic engineering, neuroscience, evolutionary biology, and deep-space exploration.

And here we go with the “theology and extraterrestrial life” nonsense again. Remember that Templeton joined the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in funding a project on theology and space exploration:

The Religion News Foundation will also produce four ReligionLink source guides to enhance journalistic coverage of complex issues surrounding science and religion on such topics as religion’s role in the search for extraterrestrial intelligent life, the religious and moral implications of artificial intelligence, neuroscience and religion, and animal faith. Each new resource will be directly distributed to our network of journalists and editors in the U.S. and abroad.

There’s not much here that couldn’t be discussed in terms of secular philosophy rather than religion. Why waste your time trying to comport the effects of scientific and technological advances on outmoded fairy tales? But, despite being warned, Templeton persists:

The successful completion of this series will enhance RNS’s reporting on science and religion, raising the bar for other media outlets to improve their coverage while educating them how best to do so with the aid of ReligionLink source guides.

This necessary improvement of mainstream media coverage will help our diverse readers and the general public better understand how science, religion, spirituality and belief impact notions of purpose and reality. The partnership aligns with RNS’ mission to inform, illuminate and inspire public discourse on matters of faith and belief.

Religion and spirituality impact purpose by telling us false stories about the “purpose” of the universe, as well as giving us “purpose” in our life that’s grounded on fiction and false hopes of an afterlife; and they impact reality by distorting our notion of what is real and true by heaping respect on faith, which is the opposite of rationality.

Despite rumors to the contrary, Templeton is by no means abandoning its primary mission of blurring the lines between faith and rationality. Shame on those money-grubbing scientists who continue to take money from the Foundation!

Andrew Sullivan on “intersectionality”

April 3, 2017 • 12:00 pm

by Greg Mayer

Most WEIT readers will be familiar with Andrew Sullivan, the conservative, gay, Catholic ur-blogger, with whom we’ve had occasion to both agree and disagree over the years. As Jerry noted, Andrew recently returned to regular writing at New York Magazine, posting a weekly “diary”, as he’s referred to it, each posting consisting of several, often unrelated, topics. It’s kind of like a blog, except he puts each day’s posts up all together, once a week.

A couple of weeks ago, Andrew, inspired by the fracas at Middlebury College, wrote about “intersectionality“. Jerry has alluded to this notion as well, although not by that name, in his critiques of the fractured and contradictory goals of at least the early versions of the March for Science.

So, what is “intersectionality”? Here’s Andrew’s characterization:

“Intersectionality” is the latest academic craze sweeping the American academy. On the surface, it’s a recent neo-Marxist theory that argues that social oppression does not simply apply to single categories of identity — such as race, gender, sexual orientation, class, etc. — but to all of them in an interlocking system of hierarchy and power.

Interestingly, he finds it to be much like a religion, which, perhaps surprisingly to some, he finds to be not a good thing. Here is the heart of his critique:

It is operating, in Orwell’s words, as a “smelly little orthodoxy,” and it manifests itself, it seems to me, almost as a religion. It posits a classic orthodoxy through which all of human experience is explained — and through which all speech must be filtered. Its version of original sin is the power of some identity groups over others. To overcome this sin, you need first to confess, i.e., “check your privilege,” and subsequently live your life and order your thoughts in a way that keeps this sin at bay. The sin goes so deep into your psyche, especially if you are white or male or straight, that a profound conversion is required.

Like the Puritanism once familiar in New England, intersectionality controls language and the very terms of discourse. It enforces manners. It has an idea of virtue — and is obsessed with upholding it. The saints are the most oppressed who nonetheless resist. The sinners are categorized in various ascending categories of demographic damnation, like something out of Dante. The only thing this religion lacks, of course, is salvation. Life is simply an interlocking drama of oppression and power and resistance, ending only in death. It’s Marx without the final total liberation.

It operates as a religion in one other critical dimension: If you happen to see the world in a different way, if you’re a liberal or libertarian or even, gasp, a conservative, if you believe that a university is a place where any idea, however loathsome, can be debated and refuted, you are not just wrong, you are immoral. If you think that arguments and ideas can have a life independent of “white supremacy,” you are complicit in evil. And you are not just complicit, your heresy is a direct threat to others, and therefore needs to be extinguished. You can’t reason with heresy. You have to ban it. It will contaminate others’ souls, and wound them irreparably.

Frank Bruni, in the New York Times, also commented on the religious nature of the increasing number of protests that find tolerance repressive, noting John McWhorter’s essay on “Antiracism, our flawed new religion“, and quoting Jonathan Haidt:

“When something becomes a religion, we don’t choose the actions that are most likely to solve the problem,” said Haidt, the author of the 2012 best seller “The Righteous Mind” and a professor at New York University. “We do the things that are the most ritually satisfying.”

He added that what he saw in footage of the confrontation at Middlebury “was a modern-day auto-da-fé: the celebration of a religious rite by burning the blasphemer.”

Andrew comments further on the religiosity of “intersectionality” in a later column, noting, among other things the connection to Herbert Marcuse’s essay “Repressive Tolerance“. He writes

The assumption, on elite college campuses, is that we are already in full possession of the moral truth. This is a religious attitude. It is certainly not a scholarly or intellectual attitude.

(One small terminological point: Marcuse dismissed the tolerance practiced in Western liberal democracies as repressive, and thus opposed what he called “repressive tolerance”. The tolerance he advocated he called “liberating tolerance”: “Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left.” (Marcuse 1965:109). When Andrew says “How about we substitute the now tired term political correctness with the less euphemistic repressive tolerance?”, I am not sure if he is just misusing “repressive tolerance” (for, indeed, the tolerance Andrew (and I) advocate was called that by Marcuse), or if he is deliberately inverting the meaning that Marcuse intended. Marcuse, presumably, would have called political correctness “liberating tolerance”. “Liberating tolerance”, by the way, is the most Orwellian phrase I’ve come across in a long time. As a candidate for incorporation into Newspeak, however, it is far too Latinate.)

Rotorua: falcons and other birds

April 3, 2017 • 10:00 am

My amiable and gracious hosts in Rotorua are Geoffrey Cox, a terrific artist who specializes in natural history (website here, more on his art later) and his wife, Barbara Hochstein, a crack radiologist. Today (Monday) Geoffrey took me to—among other places—the Wingspan National Bird of Prey Centre in Rotorua, New Zealand. The goal was to see the raptors, but especially the New Zealand falcon or kārearea (Falco novaeseelandiae), the only falcon in New Zealand and the country’s only remaining endemic dirurnal bird of prey (there’s one species of owl left, but all other daylight hunters have gone extinct save the swamp harrier, which is found in other places).

The Centre is not a zoo: its goal is to rehabilitate injured birds of prey, to breed them and introduce them back into the wild and, if an injured bird can’t be set free, to use it for breeding and for educating the public. They take their mission exceedingly seriously, and I was quite impressed.

Male and female falcons are quite dimorphic, with females larger (the male weighs about 2/3 as much as the female). I don’t know the explanation for this size difference, but it’s is seen in other New Zealand birds, like some of the extinct moas. If you know the explanation, please put it below!

Here’s a picture of the size difference between female (left) and male from the classic Buller’s Birds of New Zealand:

The falcons are seriously endangered, with far fewer falcons than kiwis living in New Zealand. One of the factors reducing the population of these birds is their habit of nesting on the ground, characteristic of many birds in New Zealand (there were no mammalian or reptilian predators to destroy eggs before humans arrived, and nesting in trees has its dangers).

The falcon’s closest living relative, according to Wikipedia, is the South American Aplomado falcon (Falco femoralis). 

To train birds to hunt in the wild before release, they are handled and trained by a falcon expert—one person per bird—and are flown every day. (I was told that without daily flying, in three days they’ll revert to being totally wild.) Today they were flying a young male, and they did a great demonstration.

Look at this lovely bird!

Below: male photographed on the handler’s gauntlet. The bird has huge eyes, like the peregrine falcon (whose eyes are as large as a human’s), and can apparently see eight times better than we. As a display in the Centre noted, a person in a car can read a license plate on a car 50 meters ahead, but a falcon can read a plate (if it could read!) 400 meters ahead.

The handler let the bird go, and he flew out of sight into the trees in the distance, spooking a bunch of sparrows on the way. We couldn’t see him at all, but he could see us, for as soon as the handler raised her glove or put out a lure, the bird came winging back.

Falcon training with a lure:

The bird can, from a long distance away, spot a tiny piece of meat placed atop a fencepost. It comes in low at a glide, a foot or so above ground  level, and then glides up to the post, using gravity and extended wings to help it stop.

Several children were asked if they wanted to hold the falcon, and nobody wanted to; but after a little girl volunteered, they all wanted to.

They then asked for adult volunteers, and of course I shouted, “Me, me, me!” Here’s the highlight of my day (and one of the highlights of my life), with the photo taken by Geoffrey. The bird also landed on my arm, but the talons didn’t hurt.

This is a bigger female awaiting her turn to fly:

A female falcon graces the New Zealand $20 note:

And they told us this is the exact female whose portrait was used for the note above:

Here’s a feathered skeleton of a New Zealand falcon attacking a blackbird.

New Zealand used to have two native owls in historical memory. Sadly, the laughing owl (Sceloglaux albifacies), or whēkau in Maori, was extinct by 1914 due to hunting, deforestation, and predation on eggs and young by introduced rats and stoats. The remaining owl, of which there was one in the Centre, is the morepork (Ninox novaeseelandiae), also found in Tasmania:

Geoffrey has a particular interest in the extinct moas and their predators, and perhaps their main predator was Haast’s eagle (Harpagornis moorei), a monstrous raptor with a wing span of 2.5-3 meters and a weight of up to 15 kg.

Here’s Geoffrey with a silhouette of a Haast’s eagle. He’s made models of both moas and parts of this raptor; I’ll show those in subsequent posts.

Although moas were larger than Haast’s eagles, the big flightless birds were easy prey. Here’s Wikipedia‘s description of an attack:

Haast’s eagles preyed on large, flightless bird species, including the moa, which was up to fifteen times the weight of the eagle. It is estimated to have attacked at speeds up to 80 km/h (50 mph), often seizing its prey’s pelvis with the talons of one foot and killing with a blow to the head or neck with the other. Its size and weight indicate a bodily striking force equivalent to a cinder block falling from the top of an eight-story building. Its large beak also could be used to rip into the internal organs of its prey and death then would have been caused by blood loss. In the absence of other large predators or scavengers, a Haast’s eagle easily could have monopolised a single large kill over a number of days.

And a reconstruction of the eagle attacking moa.

The eagles died out about the same time as the moas: about 1400 AD. The moas were driven to extinction by Maori, who craved their meat; and without prey the eagle couldn’t survive.

__________

UPDATE: Reader David Coxill sent me two swell photos related to the above (but in another country), and a description:

Your latest piece about the New Zealand Falcon reminded me of our visit to the Lakeland Bird of Prey Centre in Cumbria .
The Falconer asked if any one wanted to let a bird land on their arm . This little girl volunteered, and I managed to get a photo of the bird just landing on the glove .

I think the bird involved was a Red Tailed Hawk [Buteo jamaicensis].

The falconer at work: a man happy in his job .

Monday: Hili dialogue

April 3, 2017 • 6:30 am

by Grania

Well, here we are again, another new week on this little blue dot far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the Western Spiral arm of the Galaxy.

Today in 1996 Unabomber  Ted Kaczynski was captured ending a costly FBI hunt for him. He is now serving eight life sentences without parole for a series of bombings from 1978 to 1995. In 2000, US v Microsoft the software juggernaut was ruled to have violated US antitrust laws. More than a century earlier, in 1895 Oscar Wilde started his ill-fated and tragically misjudged libel suit against the then Marquess of Queensberry; which was ultimately to end in his own conviction and imprisonment for homosexuality.

Today was the birthday of German composer Valentin Rathgeber (1682-1750) and Italian composer Alessandro Stradella (1639-1682).

As a young man, after his studies at university, Rathgeber was first a teacher, then a chamber musician to the local abbot at Banz Abbey and then at the age of 29 entered the priesthood. Although he somehow managed to spend 11 years on a “study trip” afterwards, he eventually returned to the Abbey and died there at the relatively young age of 68.

In contrast, although Stradella composed a great deal of sacred music, it is fair to say that he was not a particularly pious man. He was renowned for extramarital “indiscretions” causing him to have flee the cities in which he lived more than once, and ultimately to be stabbed to death by a hired assassin.

Today is also the anniversary of the death of jazz singer Sarah Vaughan (1924-1990). She started playing the piano at the young age of seven and after winning a competition at Harlem’s Apollo Theater in 1942 she was hired to sing with Earl Hines’s orchestra. She had a long and varied career that spanned more than four decades.

Finally, in Poland Hili is once again displaying her finely-developed work ethic.

A: Let’s go back to work.
Hili: Maybe you could suggest something else.

In Polish:

Ja: Wracamy do pracy.
Hili: Masz może jakiś inny pomysł?