The annals of the 1619 debacle at the New York Times

JAC: Greg has another installment in his continuing series on the New York Times’s 1619 project. Readers please note that this is Greg’s piece, not mine. ______________________ by Greg Mayer As they have since it was published last year, the folks at the World Socialist Website (WSWS) continue to lead in the critique of the … Continue reading The annals of the 1619 debacle at the New York Times

Is Maggie Haberman worth it?

by Greg Mayer As early as a few years ago, Jerry began worrying about the editorial drift of the New York Times. At the time, I wasn’t concerned. The questionable pieces were op-ed articles—opinion pieces not by the Times or its reporters. Although you could question the choice of writer, it wasn’t the Times‘ writers. … Continue reading Is Maggie Haberman worth it?

“1776” throws down the gauntlet to NYT’s “1619 Project”

by Greg Mayer We’ve noted here several times at WEIT the New York Times‘ “1619 Project”, a racialist program to rewrite American history. The notices have been largely critical, and we’ve pointed out that much of the criticism has come from the World Socialist Website (WSWS), an organ of the International Committee of the Fourth … Continue reading “1776” throws down the gauntlet to NYT’s “1619 Project”

More on the 1619 Project

  by Greg Mayer Last August the New York Times Magazine launched what it called the “1619 Project“. The project’s promoters wish to change the general understanding of American history, and to have their view of American history adopted by schools. The project has generated a wave of backlash from historians. (The Times‘ Project is … Continue reading More on the 1619 Project