Why universities should remain viewpoint neutral

The Atlantic, which used to be pretty woke, is getting more and more sensible. The article below, which you can access for free by clicking on the screenshot (I also found it archived here), explains why universities and their departments should  should not make official pronouncements about morality, ideology, or politics. This has been one … Continue reading Why universities should remain viewpoint neutral

Confusion at Barnard about free speech, institutional neutrality, and academic freedom

According to the New York Times, Barnard College is in a big kerfuffle involving free speech, institutional neutrality, and academic freedom. The problem is that they’re conflating them all, so the campus is full of stress and argument that, with some good will, could be avoided. Here I proffer a simple solution to the College’s … Continue reading Confusion at Barnard about free speech, institutional neutrality, and academic freedom

Chronicle op-ed gives arguments for institutional neutrality

If you’re an academic and your college or university has issued a ringing statement in favor of political, ideological or moral positions, that might make you feel good. But in the long run it’s bad, for taking institutional positions (as opposed to personal ones) acts to chill the speech of others.  As I’ve said many … Continue reading Chronicle op-ed gives arguments for institutional neutrality

A participant reports on last fall’s Stanford Academic Freedom Conference

Elizabeth Weiss, a professor of anthropology at San José State University in California, wrote a summary of Stanford’s Academic Freedom Conference this fall for Quillette (click headline below to to read). She was not only a reporter and a participant, but also a victim—professionally damaged by those who violated her academic freedom. That’s because she … Continue reading A participant reports on last fall’s Stanford Academic Freedom Conference

An Academic Freedom Declaration

A group of academics has signed a statement, “Restoring Academic Freedom“, addressing the chilling of academic discourse by ideological pressure, and suggesting solutions to this problem. It’s several pages long, so see the whole thing at the link above. I’ve put below (indented bit) excerpts from the document. As of this morning, 641 people had … Continue reading An Academic Freedom Declaration

Academic Freedom Alliance criticizes mandatory statements of University “values”

UPDATE: I learned that Dorian Abbot of my university (the scientist whose talk was canceled at MIT) and two colleagues have written about this very issue in a new-oped in Newsweek. It mentions our university’s Kalven Report. _______________________________ The Academic Freedom Alliance (AFA) is a new but powerful organization which characterizes itself this way: . … Continue reading Academic Freedom Alliance criticizes mandatory statements of University “values”

The Kalven Report of 1967, supposedly ensuring the political neutrality of the University of Chicago

In 1967, President George Beadle of the University of Chicago (a Nobel-winning geneticist and also an avowed atheist) convened a committee whose charge was to “prepare a statement on the University’s role in social and political action.” This was the result of many people calling for the University to take positions on political issues like … Continue reading The Kalven Report of 1967, supposedly ensuring the political neutrality of the University of Chicago

University College London handles political controversy the right way

I’ve written in detail about one of the Foundational Principles of Free Expression of the University of Chicago, the one embodied in what we call the “Kalven Report“. The principle of this report, as summarized yesterday by my Chicago colleague Brian Leiter, is that our University should take no official position on any ideological, moral, … Continue reading University College London handles political controversy the right way