by Greg Mayer
As a preview of an upcoming post on frogs and toads, a chance to practice your spotting skills. No real difficulty here, but you need to spot all of them.
As we’ll see in the upcoming post, these are “rescue frogs”.
by Greg Mayer
As a preview of an upcoming post on frogs and toads, a chance to practice your spotting skills. No real difficulty here, but you need to spot all of them.
As we’ll see in the upcoming post, these are “rescue frogs”.
I see several frogs. I did not want to be the 1st to state a #.
Yep, I see four. Which means the real answer is probably like ten.
I see four easily, but I’ve no doubt there’re more. There always are.
It took me a while to see the fifth, but I’ll go on a limb and say that’s all there are.
I see three, erm, motherhoppers, with the legs of a 4th at far-left.
The normal click-to-expand facility isn’t working, if it was meant to be there.
I see three and possibly the legs referenced in the comment above, but there are probably more than that. Frogs can find places to hide in setting like that with incredible ease.
I have identified four for definite but there may well be others better concealed than that.
I see 4 frogs. For once I managed to spot
the animals.
I see three on land and two, maybe three in the water.
Four? Not counting the one in my throat.
I am pretty sure there are 5.
This is torture, I can’t magnify the image.
But …
there … are … four … frogs!!!
What I think is a 5th one is a small frog near the lower left corner, facing away. It is sitting sort of cross-wise on a stick.
RIGHT corner — my dyslexia strikes.
It’s 4, that one is a rolled up leaf.
For PC users who can’t zoom, control + scroll wheel will enlarge the whole page.
I count five frogs. Where was this Ctrl-wheel information to enlarge photos when those birds were up…?
Haha! The Picard came to my mind too.
Four for sure, maybe more.
Pretty sure their is only the 4 readily visible frogs in the image. There is only 1 in the water.
I’m on a tablet so am having no problem zooming. No matter how hard I look, I can only see the four that are easy to spot and quite obvious. The hardest to see without zooming is the one in the top centre, but even that’s very clear on zoom.
There’s lots of stuff that looks like it could be a frog, but for me, they don’t pass the zoom test.
Now I’m going to look like a complete prat when we’re told there are actually seven or something.
Well, maybe I am hallucinating frogs today, but I could swear there is a 5th one.
Try as I might I cannot find a fifth. If it’s there it’ll be a face palm moment.
Try near the lower RIGHT corner, kind of sitting cross-wise on a stick. About half the size of the other frogs.
C’mon, I am looking for proof I am not totally insane. I worry sometimes…
That one looks like a leaf to me too sorry.
🐸
Rolled leaf for me, too. Can’t you zoom in?
Can’t zoom the photo- I cry foul! 🙂
I spy 3 on land, one in the drink.
You who may not be able to zoom on a PC but I can assume quite well on an iPhone.
The zoom on my laptop is achieved est by holding down [ctrl] and toggling the “+”
There does seem to be part of a fifth in the lower left corner.
And on my laptop, “control” while using the mouse scroll wheel. (Someone’s mentioned this above.)
Of course this won’t work for the mice-less.
Aha, yes ctrl scroll wheel! I knew about that work around, but forgot. And yes, the snout of frog number five is poking out on the bottom left next to a leaf.
Ahh, now I think I see what you’re talking about, and it’s not what I thought before. We’re talking about something (spoiler alert) right above the letters “an” in clamitans, right?
Hmmm. That could be a frog’s snout. The Fifth Element! The Supreme Frog! Can it be reconstructed?
But, not enough to go by to say for sure. Perhaps the person who took the picture is the only one who could confirm.
If he or she even saw it!
…and your browser may allow zooming… Chrome allows it up to 500% in the settings.
Ah, yes, IE does too–that little icon on the status bar…
Guess there’s a method to suit everyone’s ergonomic esthetic.
…and it does no harm to the frogs. 😉
I’ve got four, plus a possible (hard to be sure) bottom right.
cr
I’m on the Four Frogs side of the schism.
Can we get a ruling?