Biology updates: snake legs, cat rolling, frog teeth and more

There hasn’t been a lot of terribly exciting evolution news lately, but there are a few items of interest (references to papers are at the bottom).

Snake legs:  It’s clear from various lines of evidence, including molecular data and paleontology, that snakes evolved from lizards who lost their legs.  But fossils of the transition are very, very rare, for snakes have fragile bones and vestigial limbs are hard to see in fossils.   A new paper in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology by Alexandra Houssaye et al., however, analyzes an amazing specimen: a half-meter long aquatic snake, 95 million years old, from Lebanon.  It’s a marine snake, and there’s controversy about whether these marine reptiles were the ancestors of all modern snakes or simply an offshoot of a terrestrial ancestor.  Likewise, we don’t know if snakes evolved from terrestrial lizards or, perhaps, aquatic ones (there’s at least one aquatic lizard: the Galápagos marine iguana).  Reagardless of these debates, the Houssaye et al. paper is nice for its remarkable analysis, via a noninvasive method (“synchrotron-radiation computed laminography”, or SRCL, whatever that is) of the vestigial legs of this early snake.

Here’s the specimen; it’s broken, so the tail segment, containing the tiny legs, is at the top right, next to the snake’s head.

And here’s the image from the SRCL scan.  Images B and D show the tiny leg, enlarged from the boxed segment in image A.  “F” is the femur, “T” the tibia, and “Fi” the fibula, all clearly homologous to the leg bones of lizards and other vertebrates.  Note that the scale bar is 1 mm long, so the leg is about 7 mm long (roughly a third of an inch).

The evolutionary origin of snakes is still a bit unclear, but what is clear is that they evolved from reptiles with legs.  The depiction of the vestigial legs here (surely on the way out, since they impeded swimming by causing drag) is a nice piece of evidence for evolution.

A description of the discovery from LiveScience is here (link seems to be broken, maybe temporarily).

Why do cats roll? Mark Abraham of the Guardian highlights an old paper (1994) by Hillary Feldman, who wanted to answer the age-old question, “Why do cats roll?”  (Citation below, the paper seems to be free.) Observing cats in a large enclosure, Feldman found that they roll for two reasons.  Females roll in oestrus as a form of sexual invitation to males, and males roll before other males as a form of submissive behavior.  These may not be surprising to cat owners, although the “roll” before a human may represent not submission, but a request for a tummy rub (viz. Baihu).  At any rate, before this study it wasn’t known whether cats showed the same kind of submissive rolling seen in social canids.

Sperm competition. Tim Birkhead, a professor at Sheffield in England, has done pathbreaking work on sperm competition in birds.  Over at The Browser, he’s interviewed about this cool phenomenon, and he recommends five relevant books, one by William Eberhard which I like a great deal.  And the Krebs and Davies book, Behavioural Ecology, is a classic that helped shaped that field.

Cuttlefish behavior. Over at her website, Karin Bondar highlights new work on cuttlefish, showing that exposing embryos to the odors of different prey can affect the feeding preferences of those animals after they’ve hatched.  There’s also a nice video showing an animal changing color.

Frog teeth violate Dollo’s Law. Dollo’s “Law” (really a generalization) is an evolutionary principle stating that once a trait is lost in evolution, it won’t reappear in exactly the same form.  The idea is that if a feature is lost by inactivating or changing the function of genes that produced it, it’s unlikely that those exact gene sequences will re-appear (or that new genes will mutate) to produce a trait that has precisely the form of the lost one. (Another interpretation is simply that it’s unlikely for a lost trait to reappear in a similar form.)  There have been some exceptions to this “law”, and now we have a new one: a paper in Evolution (yay, us!) by John Wiens of Stony Brook,  showing that a species of frog from the Neotropics (Gastrotheca guentheri) has re-evolved mandibular teeth (teeth in the lower jaw).  These teeth, lost in frogs over 200 million years ago, were regained in the ancestor of this species several million years ago.

G. guentheri (photo from Arkive).

Gastrotheca are called “marsupial” frogs because some females have a brood pouch on their backs where they deposit and carry fertilized eggs. In other species males guard the eggs in the ground, and then take the tadpoles into their pouch, carrying them around until they develop into froglets.

The Wiens paper is here, and there’s a blurb in The New York Times. I’ll try to get a picture of the teeth from Wiens.

h/t: Alexandra Houssaye and Matthew Cobb.

___________

Feldman, H. 1994.  Domestic cats and passive submission. Anim. Behav. 47: 457-459.

Guibé M, Boal JG, & Dickel L (2010). Early exposure to odors changes later visual prey preferences in cuttlefish. Developmental Psychobiology, 52:833-7.

Houssaye, A., F. Xu, L. Helfen, V. de Buffrénil, T. Baumbach and P. Tafforeau. 2011.  Three-dimensional pelvis and limb anatomy of the Cenomanian hind-limbed snake Eupodophis descouensi (Squamata: Ophidia) revealed by synchrotron-radiation computed laminography.  J. Vert. Paleontology 31:2-7.

Wiens, J.  2011.  Re-evolution of lost mandibular teeth in frogs after more than 200 million years, and reevaluating Dollo’s Law. Evolution in press: doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01221.x

21 thoughts on “Biology updates: snake legs, cat rolling, frog teeth and more

  1. Hmmm…Baihu ain’t exactly the “submissive” type. And he doesn’t “request” belly rubs; he commands them. Right now. On pain of blood.

    Erm…excuse me, it seems I have ten seconds before being bled. Nine. Eight….

    b&

    1. Calista demands belly rubs on pain of extreme guilt. I call her rolls “cuting” and interpret them as a deliberate effort to tug at my heart strings by looking as adorable as possible. How could I live with myself if I didn’t pet her RIGHT NOW?

  2. Oh! Tim Birkhead’s “The Wisdom of Birds” is a book I want…

    Loved this about his book (clicking around from the link above):

    The Wisdom of Birds.

    This could have been called The Wonder of Birds. The author, Tim Birkhead, is a brilliant academic, a professor at Sheffield University where he teaches animal behavioural and the history of science, and is a Fellow of the Royal Society. He is exceptionally gifted at conveying often complex scientific ideas very elegantly, succinctly and excitingly. In a very busy life, writing this book took him over five years. So it’s been a long genesis, but he wanted to write about how scientists through history have found things out about birds, and that involved a lot of research in books and other historical sources. I have felt great curiosity about how the world works from childhood and I think all children are natural scientists. Really, a lot of science is a form of highly focused play, a way of looking at the world which, rather than diminishing it, makes it seem more wonderful.

    Sorry for the long quote, but I love the part about science as a form of focused play…

    Here’s the link to his TED talk (actually given elsewhere, but re-posted on TED)–

    http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_birkhead_the_wisdom_of_birds.html

    Enjoy!

    (p.s.–this post is coming up first thing in the morning! I have three kids who will be all agog over the snake fossil and the frog teeth! I’m all agog myself over that beautiful fossil!)

  3. “These may not be surprising to cat owners, although the “roll” before a human may represent not submission, but a request for a tummy rub (viz. Baihu).”

    Paul Leyhausen, in his book “Cat Behavior”, speculates that cats bond to humans because our facial features are enough to trigger a social response but other cues such as scent and body shape are insufficient to elicit the kind of responses appropriate to prey or a threat.

  4. The emerging use of SRCL and other non-destructive imaging techniques for examining fossils raises an interesting question: 50 years from now, will 20th-century paleontologists be regarded as looters and vandals for actually digging up specimens and splitting them open? Would it make sense to leave some fossils undisturbed to be studied in situ by future scientists with better technology?

    1. Fossils are mostly weathering out of the ground, if we don’t grab them now they’ll be washed down the river by next year. There’s not much fossil hunting done with a bulldozer.

  5. Pingback: white bright teeth
  6. It has alway been my experience that cats roll not to invite a real belly rub – like a dog – but to invite play fighting. Touching their tummy in that position is like springing a bear trap. Lots of teeth and claws and a gleeful ‘gotcha’ look from the cat.

Comments are closed.